Graf Markus, Graf Christiana, Ziegelmayer Sebastian, Marka Alexander W, Makowski Marcus, Teumer Yannick, Paprottka Philipp, Willemsen Nele, Nadjiri Jonathan
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, School of Medicine and Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Department of Internal Medicine II, LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany.
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 2;20(5):e0323695. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323695. eCollection 2025.
Liver biopsy is the gold standard for evaluating liver diseases, the diagnosis of liver fibrosis or liver cirrhosis and malignancy. However, it is susceptible to complications, and safety data on liver biopsies remain scarce. The following study examined the complication rates following percutaneous liver biopsies.
We performed a study using data collected by the German interventional radiology society (DeGIR) from 2018 to 2021 of elective percutaneous liver biopsies. Clinical and hematological parameters, technical features and adverse events were retrospectively examined.
From 2018 to 2021, a total of 12117 percutaneous liver biopsies were performed in 194 participating centers in Germany. Complications occurred in 235 biopsies (1.9%), of which 195 (1.6%) were major adverse events. Minor complications in the form of procedural hypotension and pain occurred in 7 and 33 cases (0.06% and 0.3%, respectively). Major complications such as bleeding, organ injury and pneumothorax were observed in 166, 3 and 26 cases (1.4%, 0.02% and 0.2%). Three subjects (0.02%) died as a result of massive intraperitoneal bleeding. Major and bleeding complications were significantly more frequently observed in patients with thrombocytopenia (p < 0.001) as well as in patients undergoing computed tomography (CT)-guided procedure compared to ultrasound-guided one (p < 0.001). Moreover, general and bleeding complication rates significantly differed by the liver segment biopsied (p < 0.001). In contrast, the type of needle size used (p = 0.323), internationalized ratio (INR) (p = 0.09), aPTT (p = 0.98), gender (p = 0.83), age (p = 0.08) and the number of biopsies (p = 0.91) performed did not impact the frequency of major adverse events. By multivariate logistic regression analysis, platelet count, the imaging modality used (CT vs. ultrasound-guided) and the liver segment biopsied were identified as independent risk factors of post-biopsy bleeding (p < 0.001 each).
Percutaneous liver biopsies are safe with rare procedural morbidity. Our data confirm previous data by showing that post-procedural bleeding was not associated with INR and aPTT in patients undergoing invasive procedures. However, measurement of platelet count is indicated to identify patients with increased procedural bleeding risk. Moreover, our findings suggest that patients with liver cirrhosis as well as patients with complex findings and difficult localizations could benefit from intensified monitoring post-procedural.
肝活检是评估肝脏疾病、诊断肝纤维化或肝硬化及恶性肿瘤的金标准。然而,它易引发并发症,且关于肝活检的安全数据仍然匮乏。以下研究对经皮肝活检后的并发症发生率进行了检查。
我们使用德国介入放射学会(DeGIR)在2018年至2021年期间收集的择期经皮肝活检数据进行了一项研究。对临床和血液学参数、技术特征及不良事件进行了回顾性检查。
2018年至2021年期间,德国194个参与中心共进行了12117例经皮肝活检。235例活检(1.9%)出现并发症,其中195例(1.6%)为严重不良事件。分别有7例(0.06%)和33例(0.3%)出现了以术中低血压和疼痛形式的轻微并发症。在166例、3例和26例中观察到严重并发症,如出血、器官损伤和气胸(分别为1.4%、0.02%和0.2%)。3名受试者(0.02%)因大量腹腔内出血死亡。与超声引导下的操作相比,血小板减少患者(p < 0.001)以及接受计算机断层扫描(CT)引导操作的患者中,严重和出血并发症的发生率明显更高(p < 0.001)。此外,不同肝段活检的总体和出血并发症发生率存在显著差异(p < 0.001)。相比之下,所用针的尺寸类型(p = 0.323)、国际标准化比值(INR)(p = 0.09)、活化部分凝血活酶时间(aPTT)(p = 0.98)、性别(p = 0.83)、年龄(p = 0.08)以及进行活检的次数(p = 0.91)均未影响严重不良事件的发生频率。通过多因素逻辑回归分析,血小板计数、所使用的成像方式(CT与超声引导)以及活检的肝段被确定为活检后出血的独立危险因素(各p < 0.001)。
经皮肝活检是安全的,手术发病率较低。我们的数据通过表明侵入性操作患者的术后出血与INR和aPTT无关,证实了先前的数据。然而,建议测量血小板计数以识别手术出血风险增加的患者。此外,我们的研究结果表明,肝硬化患者以及具有复杂表现和困难定位的患者可能从术后加强监测中获益。