• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

土工织物袋界面剪切特性及渐进破坏模型研究

Study on interfacial shear characteristics and progressive failure model of geotextile bags.

作者信息

Li Hui, Shi Miao, Zhang Jia, Peng Liangliang

机构信息

Institute of Urban Rail Transit, Liaoning Railway Vocational and Technical College, Jinzhou, China.

School of Civil Engineering, Liaoning University of Technology, Jinzhou, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Jun 2;20(6):e0321058. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321058. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0321058
PMID:40455813
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12129224/
Abstract

Geotextile bag dams withstand the earth pressure of tailings in tailings reservoir by the shear stress on interface of geotextile bags. To improve the interfacial friction characteristics, pull-out tests were conducted on geotextile bags filled with fine tailings slurry containing various cement content, and the influences of cement content on the interfacial shear characteristics were explored. To describe the progressive failure of the interface, the theoretical analysis of interface pull-out behavior was performed. The results revealed that adding content cement into fine tailings slurry not only augmented the shear strength and residual strength ratio of the interface but also postponed interface softening. The optimal amount of cement was 3%, and the apparent friction angle which played a dominant role in interface strength was increased 17.4%, compared with no cement used. The elastic-plastic model and trilinear softening model were respectively improved to conform to the interfacial shear characteristics obtained in pull-out tests under low normal stress (< 60 kPa) and high normal stress (≥60 kPa). The interface shear stiffness of geotextile bag with the interfacial displacement within 20 mm and the dynamic compression modulus along the drawing direction were regarded as significant model parameters. The comparative analysis of shear stress-displacement curves, which were obtained from model calculating and test measuring, was carried out to verify the reliability and rationality of the model. The evolution patterns of the plastic zone, softening zone and residual zone of the interface were analyzed based on the model, and the warning values for interface failure were proposed. The development degree of interfacial plastic zone, softening zone and residual zone can be approximately calculated by quadratic polynomial of normalized pull-out force. The research results of this paper will provide reliable theoretical support for the design, construction and operation management of geotextile bag dams.

摘要

土工织物袋坝通过土工织物袋界面上的剪应力来承受尾矿库中尾矿的土压力。为了改善界面摩擦特性,对填充有含不同水泥含量的细尾矿浆的土工织物袋进行了拉拔试验,并探讨了水泥含量对界面剪切特性的影响。为了描述界面的渐进破坏,对界面拉拔行为进行了理论分析。结果表明,在细尾矿浆中添加水泥不仅提高了界面的抗剪强度和残余强度比,还延缓了界面软化。最佳水泥用量为3%,与不使用水泥相比,对界面强度起主导作用的表观摩擦角增加了17.4%。分别改进了弹塑性模型和三线软化模型,以符合在低法向应力(<60 kPa)和高法向应力(≥60 kPa)下的拉拔试验中获得的界面剪切特性。将土工织物袋在界面位移20 mm内的界面剪切刚度和沿拉伸方向的动态压缩模量视为重要的模型参数。通过对模型计算和试验测量得到的剪应力-位移曲线进行对比分析,验证了模型的可靠性和合理性。基于该模型分析了界面塑性区、软化区和残余区的演化模式,并提出了界面破坏的预警值。界面塑性区、软化区和残余区的发展程度可以通过归一化拉拔力的二次多项式近似计算。本文的研究成果将为土工织物袋坝的设计、施工和运行管理提供可靠的理论支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9131/12129224/327912f546f1/pone.0321058.g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9131/12129224/562add0c960d/pone.0321058.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9131/12129224/8b2f6ee8050a/pone.0321058.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9131/12129224/3f56a3b86a3f/pone.0321058.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9131/12129224/6b0eed6f726b/pone.0321058.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9131/12129224/5037e4e219f8/pone.0321058.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9131/12129224/62968e5788c4/pone.0321058.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9131/12129224/cffb96505655/pone.0321058.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9131/12129224/6e83a241be50/pone.0321058.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9131/12129224/984619df75fe/pone.0321058.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9131/12129224/4eba00db3b3c/pone.0321058.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9131/12129224/4f1eb81ec2f5/pone.0321058.g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9131/12129224/d8a0ca3ca65d/pone.0321058.g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9131/12129224/50e5996889bf/pone.0321058.g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9131/12129224/f7291a873a1d/pone.0321058.g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9131/12129224/535b2d08a178/pone.0321058.g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9131/12129224/603bd68340f3/pone.0321058.g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9131/12129224/c60199ccdc6d/pone.0321058.g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9131/12129224/327912f546f1/pone.0321058.g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9131/12129224/562add0c960d/pone.0321058.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9131/12129224/8b2f6ee8050a/pone.0321058.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9131/12129224/3f56a3b86a3f/pone.0321058.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9131/12129224/6b0eed6f726b/pone.0321058.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9131/12129224/5037e4e219f8/pone.0321058.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9131/12129224/62968e5788c4/pone.0321058.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9131/12129224/cffb96505655/pone.0321058.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9131/12129224/6e83a241be50/pone.0321058.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9131/12129224/984619df75fe/pone.0321058.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9131/12129224/4eba00db3b3c/pone.0321058.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9131/12129224/4f1eb81ec2f5/pone.0321058.g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9131/12129224/d8a0ca3ca65d/pone.0321058.g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9131/12129224/50e5996889bf/pone.0321058.g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9131/12129224/f7291a873a1d/pone.0321058.g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9131/12129224/535b2d08a178/pone.0321058.g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9131/12129224/603bd68340f3/pone.0321058.g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9131/12129224/c60199ccdc6d/pone.0321058.g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9131/12129224/327912f546f1/pone.0321058.g018.jpg

相似文献

1
Study on interfacial shear characteristics and progressive failure model of geotextile bags.土工织物袋界面剪切特性及渐进破坏模型研究
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 2;20(6):e0321058. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321058. eCollection 2025.
2
Experimental Studies on Interfacial Shear Characteristics between Polypropylene Woven Fabrics.聚丙烯机织织物界面剪切特性的实验研究
Materials (Basel). 2019 Nov 6;12(22):3649. doi: 10.3390/ma12223649.
3
Analysis of interface mechanical properties between geotextiles and tailings during pull-out tests.在拔出试验中分析土工织物与尾矿之间的界面力学性能。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 26;17(10):e0276543. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276543. eCollection 2022.
4
Strength Characteristics of a Smooth HDPE Geomembrane/Nonwoven Geotextile Interface Based on a Novel Ring Shear Apparatus.基于新型环剪试验装置的光滑高密度聚乙烯土工膜/非织造土工织物界面的强度特性
Polymers (Basel). 2023 May 29;15(11):2497. doi: 10.3390/polym15112497.
5
Triaxial Testing of Geosynthetics Reinforced Tailings with Different Reinforced Layers.不同加筋层数的土工合成材料加筋尾矿三轴试验
Materials (Basel). 2020 Apr 20;13(8):1943. doi: 10.3390/ma13081943.
6
Time-Dependent Response of a Recycled C&D Material-Geotextile Interface under Direct Shear Mode.直接剪切模式下再生拆建材料与土工织物界面的时变响应
Materials (Basel). 2021 Jun 4;14(11):3070. doi: 10.3390/ma14113070.
7
Bond strength analysis of the bone cement- stem interface of hip arthroplasties.髋关节置换术中骨水泥-柄界面的粘结强度分析
Asian Pac J Trop Med. 2014 Feb;7(2):153-9. doi: 10.1016/S1995-7645(14)60013-4.
8
Influence mechanism of structure on shear mechanical deformation characteristics of loess-steel interface.结构对黄土-钢界面剪切力学变形特性的影响机制。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 7;17(2):e0263676. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263676. eCollection 2022.
9
Effect of Sustained Loading on the Direct Shear Behaviour of Recycled C&D Material-Geosynthetic Interfaces.持续加载对再生拆建材料与土工合成材料界面直剪行为的影响。
Materials (Basel). 2023 Feb 19;16(4):1722. doi: 10.3390/ma16041722.
10
Study on the cohesive shear characteristics and intrinsic modelling of the root-tailing soil interface of Amorpha fruticosa.关于紫穗槐根系-尾土界面的黏剪特性及本构模拟研究。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 12;12(1):11800. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-15925-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Laboratory Evaluation of Geosynthetic Interface Friction under Low Stress.低应力下土工合成材料界面摩擦的实验室评估
Polymers (Basel). 2024 Sep 5;16(17):2519. doi: 10.3390/polym16172519.
2
Experimental study on the interface characteristics of geogrid-reinforced gravelly soil based on pull-out tests.基于拉拔试验的土工格栅加筋砾石土界面特性试验研究
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 15;14(1):8669. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-59297-9.
3
Interface Mechanics of Double-Twisted Hexagonal Gabion Mesh with Coarse-Grained Filler Based on Pullout Test.
基于拉拔试验的含粗粒填料双绞六边形石笼网界面力学特性
Materials (Basel). 2023 Dec 28;17(1):164. doi: 10.3390/ma17010164.
4
Analysis of interface mechanical properties between geotextiles and tailings during pull-out tests.在拔出试验中分析土工织物与尾矿之间的界面力学性能。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 26;17(10):e0276543. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276543. eCollection 2022.
5
Experimental Studies on Interfacial Shear Characteristics between Polypropylene Woven Fabrics.聚丙烯机织织物界面剪切特性的实验研究
Materials (Basel). 2019 Nov 6;12(22):3649. doi: 10.3390/ma12223649.