• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

优化用于监管决策的患者登记系统——来自HMA/EMA多利益相关方研讨会的关键经验教训

Optimizing Patient Registries for Regulatory Decision Making - Key Learnings From an HMA/EMA Multistakeholder Workshop.

作者信息

Plueschke Kelly, Jonker Carla, Kankanen Hanna, Vetter Thorsten, Sepodes Bruno, Naehrlich Lutz, Hillert Jan, Crane Gracy, Straus Sabine, Foggi Paolo, Martin Simona, Kyriakopoulou Christina, Mol Peter, Day Francesca, Breen Kieran, Bennett Neil, de Lemus Belmonte Mencia, Bennett Simon, Verpillat Patrice, Roes Kit C B, Cochino Ana, Schaefer Franz, Hernández-Rivas Jesús María, McGettigan Patricia, Arlett Peter

机构信息

European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Medicines Evaluation Board (MEB), Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2025 Sep;118(3):551-560. doi: 10.1002/cpt.3733. Epub 2025 Jun 2.

DOI:10.1002/cpt.3733
PMID:40457718
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12355018/
Abstract

The Joint Heads of Medicines Agencies and European Medicines Agency's (HMA/EMA) big data initiative paves the way for better integration of real-world data, including data from patient registries, into regulatory decisions on medicines. This article focuses on the outcome of a two-day multistakeholder workshop organized by EMA in 2024, which explored ways to optimize the EMA qualification procedure for patient registries, and to establish the value and enable the use of these data across the full spectrum of research questions. Key recommendations include the need to clarify the aim, scope, and added value of the qualification of registries, coupled with a review of the procedural steps to ensure the process is fit-for-purpose to evaluate the use of registries in specific regulatory contexts. Further recommendations focused on strengthening interactions between stakeholders, as well as providing them with enhanced support by increasing awareness of publicly available tools that could leverage the potential of registry data, together with existing guidance. The European Medicines Regulatory Network is now working together with all relevant stakeholders, including the EMA scientific committees and working parties, the Joint HMA/EMA Network Data Steering Group and existing focus groups with external partners, to implement concrete actions that will address these recommendations. Among others, the update of existing guidance, the development of templates and Questions & Answers documents, and the design of appropriate communication and stakeholder engagement plans will aid in achieving the common goal of making optimal use of patient registry data to support public health in the European Union.

摘要

药品管理机构联合负责人及欧洲药品管理局(HMA/EMA)的大数据计划为更好地整合真实世界数据(包括来自患者登记处的数据)以用于药品监管决策铺平了道路。本文重点关注EMA于2024年组织的为期两天的多利益相关方研讨会的成果,该研讨会探讨了优化患者登记处EMA资格认定程序的方法,以及确定这些数据的价值并使其能够用于解决全范围研究问题的方法。关键建议包括需要明确登记处资格认定的目的、范围和附加值,同时审查程序步骤以确保该过程适合评估登记处在特定监管背景下的使用情况。进一步的建议侧重于加强利益相关方之间的互动,并通过提高对可利用登记处数据潜力的公开可用工具以及现有指南的认识,为他们提供更多支持。欧洲药品监管网络目前正与所有相关利益相关方合作,包括EMA科学委员会和工作组、HMA/EMA联合网络数据指导小组以及与外部合作伙伴的现有焦点小组,以实施将解决这些建议的具体行动。其中,更新现有指南、制定模板和问答文件以及设计适当的沟通和利益相关方参与计划将有助于实现最佳利用患者登记处数据以支持欧盟公共卫生这一共同目标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c46/12355018/042d2fbdde6c/CPT-118-551-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c46/12355018/49ed2cee3bdb/CPT-118-551-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c46/12355018/19a8f426533f/CPT-118-551-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c46/12355018/042d2fbdde6c/CPT-118-551-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c46/12355018/49ed2cee3bdb/CPT-118-551-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c46/12355018/19a8f426533f/CPT-118-551-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c46/12355018/042d2fbdde6c/CPT-118-551-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Optimizing Patient Registries for Regulatory Decision Making - Key Learnings From an HMA/EMA Multistakeholder Workshop.优化用于监管决策的患者登记系统——来自HMA/EMA多利益相关方研讨会的关键经验教训
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2025 Sep;118(3):551-560. doi: 10.1002/cpt.3733. Epub 2025 Jun 2.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Interventions to improve safe and effective medicines use by consumers: an overview of systematic reviews.改善消费者安全有效用药的干预措施:系统评价概述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 29;2014(4):CD007768. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007768.pub3.
4
Stakeholders' Perspectives Toward the Use of Patient Registry Data for Decision-Making on Medicines: A Cross-Sectional Survey.利益相关者对使用患者登记数据进行药品决策的看法:一项横断面调查。
Drug Saf. 2025 Feb 23. doi: 10.1007/s40264-025-01528-7.
5
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
6
A Review and Comparative Case Study Analysis of Real-World Evidence in European Regulatory and Health Technology Assessment Decision Making for Oncology Medicines.欧洲肿瘤药物监管与卫生技术评估决策中真实世界证据的综述与比较案例研究分析
Value Health. 2025 Jan;28(1):31-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.09.007. Epub 2024 Oct 10.
7
Developing evidence-based guidelines for describing potential benefits and harms within patient information leaflets/sheets (PILs) that inform and do not cause harm (PrinciPILs).制定基于证据的指南,用于在患者信息单页/说明书(PrinciPILs)中描述潜在益处和危害,这些信息单页既能提供信息又不会造成伤害。
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Aug;29(43):1-20. doi: 10.3310/GJJH2402.
8
Improving the FAIRness and Sustainability of the NHGRI Resources Ecosystem.提高国家人类基因组研究所资源生态系统的公平性和可持续性。
ArXiv. 2025 Aug 19:arXiv:2508.13498v1.
9
Mapping the European landscape and specificity of ATMPs guidance.绘制欧洲先进治疗药物(ATMPs)指南的概况及特点。
Cytotherapy. 2025 Jun 20. doi: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2025.06.008.
10
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Utilization of Evidence Blueprint Initiative to Transform Capability Development in AstraZeneca Spain.利用证据蓝图计划转变阿斯利康西班牙公司的能力发展
Pharmaceut Med. 2025 Jul 21. doi: 10.1007/s40290-025-00575-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Bench to Budget: Integrated Evidence Generation for Medications.从实验室到预算:药物综合证据生成
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2025 Apr;117(4):869-871. doi: 10.1002/cpt.3603.
2
Stakeholders' Perspectives Toward the Use of Patient Registry Data for Decision-Making on Medicines: A Cross-Sectional Survey.利益相关者对使用患者登记数据进行药品决策的看法:一项横断面调查。
Drug Saf. 2025 Feb 23. doi: 10.1007/s40264-025-01528-7.
3
Clinical Evidence 2030.临床证据2030
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2025 Apr;117(4):884-886. doi: 10.1002/cpt.3596. Epub 2025 Feb 14.
4
Bleeding phenotype according to factor level in 825 children with nonsevere hemophilia: data from the PedNet cohort.825例非重度血友病患儿按因子水平划分的出血表型:来自PedNet队列的数据。
J Thromb Haemost. 2024 Sep;22(9):2460-2469. doi: 10.1016/j.jtha.2024.05.030. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
5
Leveraging patient experience data to guide medicines development, regulation, access decisions and clinical care in the EU.利用患者体验数据指导欧盟的药物研发、监管、准入决策和临床护理。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 May 23;11:1408636. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1408636. eCollection 2024.
6
SURF: A Screening Tool (for Sponsors) to Evaluate Whether Using Real-World Data to Support an Effectiveness Claim in an FDA Application Has Regulatory Feasibility.SURF:一种(供申办者使用的)筛选工具,用于评估在FDA申请中使用真实世界数据支持有效性声明是否具有监管可行性。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2023 Nov;114(5):981-993. doi: 10.1002/cpt.3021. Epub 2023 Aug 25.
7
Prevalence, clinical characteristics and outcomes of heart failure patients with or without isolated or combined mitral and tricuspid regurgitation: An analysis from the ESC-HFA Heart Failure Long-Term Registry.射血分数保留的心力衰竭患者合并或不合并孤立性或混合性二尖瓣和三尖瓣反流的患病率、临床特征和结局:来自 ESC-HFA 心力衰竭长期注册研究的分析。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2023 Jul;25(7):1061-1071. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2929. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
8
A Structured Process to Identify Fit-for-Purpose Study Design and Data to Generate Valid and Transparent Real-World Evidence for Regulatory Uses.一种用于识别适合目的的研究设计和数据的结构化流程,以生成用于监管用途的有效和透明的真实世界证据。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2023 Jun;113(6):1235-1239. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2883. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
9
Leveraging Comprehensive Cancer Registry Data to Enable a Broad Range of Research, Audit and Patient Support Activities.利用综合癌症登记数据开展广泛的研究、审计及患者支持活动。
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Aug 26;14(17):4131. doi: 10.3390/cancers14174131.
10
Contribution of patient registries to regulatory decision making on rare diseases medicinal products in Europe.患者登记系统对欧洲罕见病药品监管决策的贡献。
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Aug 4;13:924648. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.924648. eCollection 2022.