Hamon A, Guinard-Flament J, Costa A, Fischer A, Faverdin P, Gelé M, Boudon A, Lemosquet S
Institut Agro Rennes-Angers, 35042 Rennes, France.
Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40064 Ozzano dell'Emilia (BO), Italy.
JDS Commun. 2025 Mar 18;6(3):432-437. doi: 10.3168/jdsc.2024-0717. eCollection 2025 May.
Milk lactose content (LC) is known to vary due to metabolic disorders and udder inflammation. To assess its ability to serve as a marker of these 2 disorders, it is important to first understand its dynamics for healthy cows, particularly its relation with milk osmolarity, because it is the main osmotic agent. To assess the dynamics of LC, we studied relations among contents of lactose and other major osmotic agents in milk throughout lactation in different parities. Cows were fed a constant TMR diet throughout lactation. The profile of osmotic agents in morning milk (lactose, K, Na, Cl, and protein) was measured in the milk of 30 cows (17 primiparous and 13 multiparous). To avoid confounding effects due to udder inflammation, data from cows with unhealthy udders (i.e., 2 or more milk samples with SCC >200,000 cells/mL) were excluded (n = 2 primiparous and 3 multiparous). From 12 to 235 DIM, 8 to 9 samples per cow were first taken 2 wk apart, and then taken monthly. A regression model that included cow parity, DIM, their interaction, and a random cow effect was used to illustrate the dynamics of milk osmolarity and each osmotic agent throughout lactation. Milk osmolarity remained stable throughout lactation (279 ± 0.3 mOsm/L), with no significant difference between primiparous and multiparous cows. The contents of lactose, K, Na, Cl, and protein explained 86.4% of milk osmolarity. Milk LC was lower for multiparous compared with primiparous cows over the entire lactation period, except at 12 DIM, when both parity cows had similar LC. For multiparous cows, the lower LC was compensated by higher Na content. Principal component analysis of all osmotic agents explained 82% and 83% of the cumulative variance throughout lactation for primiparous and multiparous cows, respectively. At 12 DIM, multiparous cows had lower LC and Cl and K contents compared with primiparous cows, which exhibited only lower LC compared with the rest of the lactation period. From 40 to 235 DIM, however, milk from the 2 parities had similar dynamics of osmotic agents: K content decreased and protein content increased. This study revealed that in cows with healthy udders, the dynamics of LC and other osmotic agents contents in milk differed between parities and throughout lactation to maintain a constant milk osmolarity.
已知牛奶乳糖含量(LC)会因代谢紊乱和乳房炎症而有所不同。为评估其作为这两种疾病标志物的能力,首先了解其在健康奶牛中的动态变化很重要,特别是其与牛奶渗透压的关系,因为乳糖是主要的渗透剂。为评估LC的动态变化,我们研究了不同胎次奶牛整个泌乳期牛奶中乳糖及其他主要渗透剂含量之间的关系。整个泌乳期给奶牛饲喂恒定的全混合日粮(TMR)。在30头奶牛(17头初产牛和13头经产牛)的牛奶中测量了早晨牛奶中渗透剂(乳糖、钾、钠、氯和蛋白质)的含量。为避免乳房炎症的混杂影响,排除了乳房不健康奶牛的数据(即体细胞计数(SCC)>200,000个细胞/毫升的2份或更多份牛奶样本)(2头初产牛和3头经产牛)。在12至235天泌乳期内,每头奶牛首先每隔2周采集8至9份样本,然后每月采集一次。使用包含奶牛胎次、泌乳天数、它们的交互作用以及随机奶牛效应的回归模型来阐述整个泌乳期牛奶渗透压和每种渗透剂的动态变化。整个泌乳期牛奶渗透压保持稳定(279±0.3毫摩尔/升),初产牛和经产牛之间无显著差异。乳糖、钾、钠、氯和蛋白质的含量解释了牛奶渗透压的86.4%。在整个泌乳期,经产牛的牛奶LC低于初产牛,但在泌乳12天时除外,此时两种胎次的奶牛LC相似。对于经产牛,较低的LC由较高的钠含量补偿。对所有渗透剂进行主成分分析,分别解释了初产牛和经产牛整个泌乳期累积方差的82%和83%。在泌乳12天时,经产牛的LC、氯和钾含量低于初产牛,而初产牛仅LC相较于泌乳期其他时间较低。然而,在40至235天泌乳期,两种胎次奶牛的牛奶渗透剂动态变化相似:钾含量下降,蛋白质含量上升。本研究表明,在乳房健康的奶牛中,牛奶中LC和其他渗透剂含量的动态变化在不同胎次以及整个泌乳期存在差异,以维持牛奶渗透压恒定。