• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估与手术中突破性出血相关的环境影响。

Assessing the environmental impact associated with disruptive surgical bleeding.

作者信息

Kocaman Mesut, Johnston Stephen, Afolabi Mosadoluwa, Danker Walter, Adshead Fiona

机构信息

Johnson & Johnson MedTech, Berkshire, UK.

Johnson & Johnson MedTech, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.

出版信息

Surg Open Sci. 2025 Apr 29;26:54-60. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2025.04.009. eCollection 2025 Jun.

DOI:10.1016/j.sopen.2025.04.009
PMID:40458299
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12127585/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Minimizing avoidable healthcare resource use can support a move towards more sustainable healthcare systems. Few studies have sought to evaluate the environmental impact of complications associated with specific surgical procedures. The aim of this study was to assess the environmental impact associated with disruptive surgical bleeding across a broad range of procedures.

METHODS

The environmental impact assessment was performed using clinical and healthcare resource use data from a retrospective database analysis of patients with disruptive bleeding across nine procedures. Emissions data from the Sustainable Healthcare Coalition were sourced for the relevant resource use activities and used to calculate the climate, water and waste impact associated with disruptive surgical bleeding.

RESULTS

Across the procedures of interest, surgical bleeding was shown to incur a mean environmental impact of 167 kg COe, 267 m water use and 20 kg waste. Considering the incidence of disruptive bleeding per 1000 procedures, treatment of bleeding during valve procedures was associated with the highest environmental impact due to the high proportion of patients in which this complication occurs (44 %). Achieving effective and timely control of surgical bleeding events and reducing their incidence by 50 % could save up to 49 tons of CO₂e, 77,082 m of water use, and 6.3 tons of waste per 1000 surgical procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical bleeding is associated with a substantial environmental impact. This study demonstrates the potential to use existing resource use data associated with specific healthcare activities to assess their environmental impact, helping to identify key areas for improvement in the sustainability of surgical departments.

摘要

背景

尽量减少可避免的医疗资源使用有助于推动医疗系统向更可持续的方向发展。很少有研究试图评估特定外科手术相关并发症对环境的影响。本研究的目的是评估一系列手术中手术出血造成的环境影响。

方法

使用来自对九种手术中出现手术出血的患者进行回顾性数据库分析的临床和医疗资源使用数据进行环境影响评估。从可持续医疗联盟获取相关资源使用活动的排放数据,并用于计算与手术出血相关的气候、水和废物影响。

结果

在感兴趣的手术中,手术出血显示平均产生167千克二氧化碳当量的环境影响、267立方米的水消耗和20千克的废物。考虑到每1000例手术中手术出血的发生率,瓣膜手术中出血的治疗对环境的影响最大,因为发生这种并发症的患者比例很高(44%)。有效及时地控制手术出血事件并将其发生率降低50%,每1000例手术最多可节省49吨二氧化碳当量、77082立方米的水消耗和6.3吨的废物。

结论

手术出血对环境有重大影响。本研究表明,利用与特定医疗活动相关的现有资源使用数据来评估其环境影响具有潜力,有助于确定外科科室可持续性改进的关键领域。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/143d/12127585/74633d8a65d2/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/143d/12127585/74633d8a65d2/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/143d/12127585/74633d8a65d2/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing the environmental impact associated with disruptive surgical bleeding.评估与手术中突破性出血相关的环境影响。
Surg Open Sci. 2025 Apr 29;26:54-60. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2025.04.009. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Clinical and Economic Burden Associated with Disruptive Surgical Bleeding: A Retrospective Database Analysis.与手术中出血相关的临床和经济负担:一项回顾性数据库分析。
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2023 Jul 3;15:535-547. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S411778. eCollection 2023.
3
Assessing the environmental impact of an anastomotic leak care pathway.评估吻合口漏护理路径的环境影响。
Surg Open Sci. 2023 Jul 11;14:81-86. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2023.07.001. eCollection 2023 Aug.
4
5
How Can the Environmental Impact of Orthopaedic Surgery Be Measured and Reduced? Using Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction as a Test Case.如何衡量和减少骨科手术对环境的影响?以前交叉韧带重建为例进行分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):7-19. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003242.
6
The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health.美诺集团-摩纳哥基金会塑料与人体健康委员会
Ann Glob Health. 2023 Mar 21;89(1):23. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4056. eCollection 2023.
7
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
8
Carbon footprinting and environmental impact of gastrointestinal endoscopy procedures at a tertiary care institution: a prospective multi-dimensional assessment.三级医疗机构胃肠内镜检查的碳足迹与环境影响:一项前瞻性多维度评估
Gut. 2025 May 7;74(6):926-934. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2024-332471.
9
Increasing Incremental Burden of Surgical Bleeding Associated with Multiple Comorbidities as Measured by the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index: A Retrospective Database Analysis.用埃利克斯豪泽合并症指数衡量的与多种合并症相关的手术出血增量负担增加:一项回顾性数据库分析
Med Devices (Auckl). 2023 Dec 4;16:237-249. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S434779. eCollection 2023.
10
Perceptions and concerns about sustainable healthcare of nursing students trained in sustainability and health: A cohort study.可持续性护理专业学生对可持续性医疗保健的认知和关注:一项队列研究。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2022 Nov;65:103489. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103489. Epub 2022 Oct 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Plus Sutures for preventing surgical site infection: a systematic review of clinical outcomes with economic and environmental models.缝线预防手术部位感染:临床结局的系统评价,同时构建了经济和环境模型。
BMC Surg. 2023 Oct 3;23(1):300. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02187-0.
2
Clinical and economic burden of surgical complications during hospitalization for digestive cancer surgery in France.法国消化系统癌症手术住院期间手术并发症的临床和经济负担。
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2023 Dec;6(12):e1895. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.1895. Epub 2023 Oct 2.
3
How can environmental impacts be incorporated in health technology assessment, and how impactful would this be?
如何将环境影响纳入卫生技术评估,以及这会产生多大影响?
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2023 Jul-Dec;23(9):975-980. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2023.2248389. Epub 2023 Aug 21.
4
Assessing the environmental impact of an anastomotic leak care pathway.评估吻合口漏护理路径的环境影响。
Surg Open Sci. 2023 Jul 11;14:81-86. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2023.07.001. eCollection 2023 Aug.
5
Clinical and Economic Burden Associated with Disruptive Surgical Bleeding: A Retrospective Database Analysis.与手术中出血相关的临床和经济负担:一项回顾性数据库分析。
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2023 Jul 3;15:535-547. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S411778. eCollection 2023.
6
The carbon footprint of healthcare settings: A systematic review.医疗机构的碳足迹:系统评价。
J Adv Nurs. 2023 Aug;79(8):2830-2844. doi: 10.1111/jan.15671. Epub 2023 May 17.
7
Ambulance use and subsequent fragmented hospital readmission among older adults.老年人的救护车使用情况和随后的碎片化医院再入院。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 May;71(5):1416-1428. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18210. Epub 2022 Dec 27.
8
The environmental footprint of health care: a global assessment.医疗保健的环境足迹:全球评估。
Lancet Planet Health. 2020 Jul;4(7):e271-e279. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30121-2.
9
Avoidable 30-day readmissions in patients undergoing vascular surgery.血管外科患者的可避免 30 天再入院率。
BJS Open. 2019 Aug 2;3(6):759-766. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50191. eCollection 2019 Dec.
10
Sustainability in quality improvement: redefining value.质量改进中的可持续性:重新定义价值。
Future Healthc J. 2018 Jun;5(2):88-93. doi: 10.7861/futurehosp.5-2-88.