• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种新型股动脉电动压迫装置用于股动脉穿刺后止血的安全性和有效性。

Safety and effectiveness of a novel electric femoral artery compression device for hemostasis after femoral artery puncture.

作者信息

Zhong Zhihong, Ni Hongyang, Chen Xiao, Zhu Jun, Jiang Hong, Hu Jinqing, Lin Dong, Bian Liuguan

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2025 May 19;16:1582310. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1582310. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fneur.2025.1582310
PMID:40458462
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12127189/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the hemostatic efficacy of a novel electric femoral artery compression device in patients who underwent percutaneous endovascular procedure through femoral artery puncture.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 1,086 patients treated with the electric compression device (ECD) and/or vascular closure device (VCD) for hemostasis of femoral catheterization sites. The clinical success of hemostasis and complications of femoral artery puncture site were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total clinical success rate of 84.8% was achieved. Minor complications occurred in 161 of 1,086 patients (14.8%), and major complications occurred in 4 of 1,086 patients (0.4%). Combined application of ECD and VCD showed a lower rate of complications than using ECD or VCD alone in patients who underwent treatment of antiplatelet agents and anticoagulant.

CONCLUSION

ECD is a safe and effective tool for hemostasis in femoral artery puncture site in percutaneous endovascular procedure with high clinical success and low complication rates.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨一种新型股动脉电动压迫装置在经股动脉穿刺进行经皮血管腔内手术患者中的止血效果。

方法

我们回顾性分析了1086例接受电动压迫装置(ECD)和/或血管闭合装置(VCD)进行股动脉穿刺部位止血治疗的患者。收集并分析了止血的临床成功率及股动脉穿刺部位的并发症情况。

结果

总体临床成功率为84.8%。1086例患者中有161例(14.8%)发生轻微并发症,1086例患者中有4例(0.4%)发生严重并发症。在接受抗血小板药物和抗凝治疗的患者中,ECD和VCD联合应用的并发症发生率低于单独使用ECD或VCD。

结论

ECD是经皮血管腔内手术中股动脉穿刺部位止血的一种安全有效的工具,临床成功率高,并发症发生率低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f83/12127189/c701d47119b1/fneur-16-1582310-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f83/12127189/c701d47119b1/fneur-16-1582310-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f83/12127189/c701d47119b1/fneur-16-1582310-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Safety and effectiveness of a novel electric femoral artery compression device for hemostasis after femoral artery puncture.一种新型股动脉电动压迫装置用于股动脉穿刺后止血的安全性和有效性。
Front Neurol. 2025 May 19;16:1582310. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1582310. eCollection 2025.
2
Factors related to insufficient hemostasis using the EXOSEAL vascular closure device with five-minutes compression for femoral artery punctures after neuro-endovascular therapy: A retrospective, single-center experience.神经介入治疗后使用 EXOSEAL 血管闭合装置行 5 分钟压迫时发生股动脉穿刺部位止血不充分的相关因素:回顾性单中心经验。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2024 Apr;30(2):255-263. doi: 10.1177/15910199221138367. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
3
FemoSeal Device Use for Femoral Artery Closure by Different Techniques.采用不同技术使用FemoSeal装置进行股动脉闭合
Ann Vasc Surg. 2018 Aug;51:18-24. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2018.02.016. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
4
A randomized comparison of a novel bioabsorbable vascular closure device versus manual compression in the achievement of hemostasis after percutaneous femoral procedures: the ECLIPSE (Ensure's Vascular Closure Device Speeds Hemostasis Trial).新型生物可吸收血管闭合装置与手动压迫用于经皮股动脉手术后止血效果的随机对照研究:ECLIPSE(确保血管闭合装置加速止血试验)
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Aug;2(8):785-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.06.006.
5
Incidence of delayed angiographic femoral artery complications using the EXOSEAL vascular closure device.使用EXOSEAL血管闭合装置后延迟性血管造影股动脉并发症的发生率。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2015 Jun;21(3):401-6. doi: 10.1177/1591019915581776. Epub 2015 May 26.
6
Comparison of vascular closure devices vs manual compression after femoral artery puncture: the ISAR-CLOSURE randomized clinical trial.经股动脉穿刺后使用血管闭合装置与手动压迫的比较:ISAR-CLOSURE 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2014 Nov 19;312(19):1981-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.15305.
7
Rationale and design of a randomised clinical trial comparing vascular closure device and manual compression to achieve haemostasis after diagnostic coronary angiography: the Instrumental Sealing of ARterial puncture site - CLOSURE device versus manual compression (ISAR-CLOSURE) trial.一项比较血管闭合装置与手动压迫在诊断性冠状动脉造影术后实现止血效果的随机临床试验的原理与设计:动脉穿刺部位器械封闭 - 闭合装置与手动压迫(ISAR-CLOSURE)试验
EuroIntervention. 2014 Jun;10(2):198-203. doi: 10.4244/EIJV10I2A33.
8
Vascular closure devices for femoral arterial puncture site haemostasis.用于股动脉穿刺部位止血的血管闭合装置。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 7;3(3):CD009541. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009541.pub2.
9
A novel femoral artery compression device (butterfly compress) versus manual compression for hemostasis after femoral artery puncture: a randomized comparison.一种新型股动脉压迫装置(蝴蝶夹)与手动压迫在股动脉穿刺后止血的随机比较。
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2022 Jan;31(1):50-57. doi: 10.1080/13645706.2020.1773856. Epub 2020 Jun 13.
10
Feasibility study of NeoMend, a percutaneous arterial closure device that uses a nonthrombogenic bioadhesive.NeoMend的可行性研究,一种使用非血栓形成生物粘合剂的经皮动脉闭合装置。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003 Feb;180(2):533-8. doi: 10.2214/ajr.180.2.1800533.

本文引用的文献

1
Emerging Treatments for Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.颅内出血的新兴治疗方法。
CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets. 2024;23(11):1345-1356. doi: 10.2174/0118715273279212240130065713.
2
Assessment of Blood Loss during Neuroendovascular Procedures.神经血管介入手术中失血情况的评估。
J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 24;13(3):677. doi: 10.3390/jcm13030677.
3
Iatrogenic Common Femoral Artery Occlusion Caused by a Suture-Mediated Closure System: A Case Report.缝线介导闭合系统导致的医源性股总动脉闭塞:一例报告
Ann Vasc Dis. 2021 Dec 25;14(4):368-371. doi: 10.3400/avd.cr.21-00050.
4
A novel femoral artery compression device (butterfly compress) versus manual compression for hemostasis after femoral artery puncture: a randomized comparison.一种新型股动脉压迫装置(蝴蝶夹)与手动压迫在股动脉穿刺后止血的随机比较。
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2022 Jan;31(1):50-57. doi: 10.1080/13645706.2020.1773856. Epub 2020 Jun 13.
5
A systematic review of vascular closure devices for femoral artery puncture sites.经股动脉穿刺部位血管闭合装置的系统评价
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Sep;68(3):887-899. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.05.019. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
6
Single-center experience with vascular closure devices in real-world endovascular peripheral interventions.
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2018 Dec;59(6):797-803. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.16.09207-7. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
7
Usefulness and safety of the "God's Hand" pneumatic compression device for hemostasis in femoral catheterization.“神之手”气动压迫装置在股动脉插管止血中的有效性与安全性。
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2017 Jan-Feb;23(1):49-54. doi: 10.5152/dir.2016.15451.
8
Evaluation of the method of hemostasis after femoral arterial puncture.股动脉穿刺后止血方法的评估
J Phys Ther Sci. 2014 Jul;26(7):955-9. doi: 10.1589/jpts.26.955. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
9
Meta-analysis of randomized trials on the efficacy of vascular closure devices after diagnostic angiography and angioplasty.诊断性血管造影和血管成形术后血管闭合装置疗效的随机试验的荟萃分析。
Am Heart J. 2010 Apr;159(4):518-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.12.027.
10
Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of suture-mediated closure device-related femoral artery stenosis or occlusive disease.
Br J Radiol. 2009 Jun;82(978):486-90. doi: 10.1259/bjr/25029516. Epub 2008 Dec 19.