Bryan Amelia, Feltes Jordan, Sweetser Peter William, Winsten Samuel, Hunter Ian, Yamane David
Department of Emergency Medicine, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, United States.
Department of Emergency Medicine, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, United States.
Am J Emerg Med. 2025 Sep;95:153-158. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2025.05.026. Epub 2025 May 19.
Video laryngoscopy (VL) is a widely utilized method for endotracheal intubation that both increases first pass success and reduces esophageal intubations. Use of VL in a teaching environment allows for real-time feedback for new learners and creates an opportunity for education and quality improvement. There is limited research on the difficulties that VL users face during intubation attempts. This study aims to explore the errors practitioners make while using hyperangulated video laryngoscopes and investigate how the errors affect intubation time.
We conducted a retrospective observational study of 101 intubations performed using hyperangulated VL at a single academic hospital. All intubations were performed by Emergency Medicine residents with supervision from attending physicians. Videos were reviewed by two persons and discrepancies were resolved by a third party. The variables included were grade of view, intubation times, and multiple noted errors of intubation consistent with those previously studied.
First pass success occurred in 84.9 % of intubations; of those, the median time (IQR) to obtain a view of the vocal cords was 7 (5-11) seconds and the median time for tube delivery was 26 (20.75-43) seconds. 67.0 % of successful intubations reviewed contained at least one error. 43.8 % of intubations had errors in blade placement. The second most frequent error was difficulty with tube delivery occurring in 39.6 % of intubations. Inappropriate use of suction was another studied error; unnecessary suctioning accounted for 35.7 % of all cases where suction was used, and suction was not performed when indicated in 9.0 % of cases.
Correct blade placement and anterior delivery of the endotracheal tube are the most challenging steps of the intubation process for our residents. Future educational sessions for novice intubators can focus on techniques such as proper patient positioning, endotracheal tube and stylet molding, and hand positioning for delivering the endotracheal tube (ETT) to help mitigate these errors.
视频喉镜(VL)是一种广泛应用于气管插管的方法,它既能提高首次插管成功率,又能减少食管插管的发生。在教学环境中使用视频喉镜可为新学习者提供实时反馈,并创造教育和质量改进的机会。关于视频喉镜使用者在插管尝试过程中所面临困难的研究有限。本研究旨在探讨从业者在使用超广角视频喉镜时所犯的错误,并调查这些错误如何影响插管时间。
我们在一家学术医院对101例使用超广角视频喉镜进行的插管操作进行了回顾性观察研究。所有插管操作均由急诊医学住院医师在主治医师的监督下进行。两名人员对视频进行了审查,分歧由第三方解决。纳入的变量包括视野分级、插管时间以及与先前研究一致的多次记录的插管错误。
84.9%的插管操作首次尝试成功;其中,获得声带视野的中位时间(四分位间距)为7(5 - 11)秒,送管的中位时间为26(20.75 - 43)秒。在成功的插管操作中,67.0%的操作至少包含一个错误。43.8%的插管操作存在镜片放置错误。第二常见的错误是送管困难,在39.6%的插管操作中出现。不当使用吸引器是另一个研究的错误;在所有使用吸引器的病例中,不必要的吸引占35.7%,而在9.0%的病例中,有指征时未进行吸引。
正确的镜片放置和气管导管的向前推送是我们住院医师插管过程中最具挑战性的步骤。未来针对新手插管者的教育课程可以侧重于诸如正确的患者体位、气管导管和管芯塑形以及送管时的手部位置等技术,以帮助减少这些错误。