Sato Airin, Matsui Yu, Makino Teruhiko, Shimizu Tadamichi
Department of Dermatology, University of Toyama, Toyama, JPN.
Cureus. 2025 May 4;17(5):e83448. doi: 10.7759/cureus.83448. eCollection 2025 May.
Elliptical skin biopsy is a commonly performed dermatologic procedure that provides sufficient tissue for histopathologic diagnosis and additional testing. However, concerns remain regarding the risk of surgical site infection (SSI), leading to the widespread use of prophylactic antibiotics despite the lack of clear supporting evidence. This study aimed to evaluate whether prophylactic antibiotic administration reduces SSI risk following elliptical biopsy.
A retrospective observational study was conducted at the University of Toyama, including 202 patients who underwent elliptical biopsy between October 2022 and July 2024. Among them, 146 (72.3%) received prophylactic antibiotics, while 56 (27.7%) did not. The primary outcome was the incidence of SSI within 30 days post procedure. Multivariable logistic regression and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were applied to adjust for potential confounders.
SSI occurred at similar rates in both groups (prophylactic vs. non-prophylactic: 11.0% vs. 10.7%, p = 1.0), suggesting that antibiotic prophylaxis may not be effective in reducing infection risk. Neither multivariable logistic regression nor IPTW analysis demonstrated a significant association between prophylactic antibiotic use and SSI prevention. Additionally, clinicians with more years of experience were less likely to prescribe prophylactic antibiotics, indicating greater confidence in withholding antibiotics when not clinically necessary. In contrast, higher serum albumin levels were associated with greater antibiotic use. Although this association reached statistical significance, the actual difference in albumin levels (4.1 vs. 3.8 g/dL) is modest and likely lacks clinical relevance. These findings suggest that antibiotic prescribing may have been influenced more by physician discretion, particularly among less experienced clinicians, as well as by institutional practices, routine habits, or excessive concern about SSI risk, rather than by objective indicators of clinical need.
These findings suggest that routine prophylactic antibiotic use after elliptical biopsy may not be necessary in dermatologic practice. Given increasing concerns about antimicrobial resistance and antibiotic shortages, optimizing antibiotic use is a critical consideration. Emphasizing alternative strategies, such as meticulous wound irrigation, postoperative care, and patient education, may help minimize SSI risk while ensuring safe wound healing. Further prospective studies with larger cohorts and standardized treatment protocols are warranted to confirm these findings.
椭圆形皮肤活检是一种常用的皮肤科手术,可为组织病理学诊断和进一步检测提供足够的组织。然而,手术部位感染(SSI)的风险仍然令人担忧,尽管缺乏明确的支持证据,但预防性抗生素仍被广泛使用。本研究旨在评估预防性使用抗生素是否能降低椭圆形活检后的SSI风险。
在富山大学进行了一项回顾性观察研究,纳入了2022年10月至2024年7月期间接受椭圆形活检的202例患者。其中,146例(72.3%)接受了预防性抗生素治疗,56例(27.7%)未接受。主要结局是术后30天内SSI的发生率。采用多变量逻辑回归和治疗加权逆概率(IPTW)来调整潜在的混杂因素。
两组的SSI发生率相似(预防性用药组与非预防性用药组:11.0%对10.7%,p = 1.0),这表明预防性使用抗生素可能无法有效降低感染风险。多变量逻辑回归和IPTW分析均未显示预防性使用抗生素与预防SSI之间存在显著关联。此外,经验更丰富的临床医生开具预防性抗生素的可能性较小,这表明他们在临床不需要时更有信心不使用抗生素。相比之下,血清白蛋白水平较高与更多地使用抗生素相关。尽管这种关联具有统计学意义,但白蛋白水平的实际差异(4.1对3.8 g/dL)较小,可能缺乏临床相关性。这些发现表明,抗生素的开具可能更多地受到医生的判断影响,特别是在经验不足的临床医生中,以及受到机构做法、常规习惯或对SSI风险的过度担忧的影响,而不是受临床需求的客观指标影响。
这些发现表明,在皮肤科实践中,椭圆形活检后常规预防性使用抗生素可能没有必要。鉴于对抗菌素耐药性和抗生素短缺的担忧日益增加,优化抗生素使用是一个关键考虑因素。强调替代策略,如细致的伤口冲洗、术后护理和患者教育,可能有助于在确保伤口安全愈合的同时将SSI风险降至最低。有必要进行进一步的前瞻性研究,纳入更大的队列并采用标准化的治疗方案来证实这些发现。