Ashraf Salman, Khan Madeha, Naguib Nada, Rulach Robert, Welsh Katharine, Carozzi Rebecca, Horne Ashley, Payne Amelia, Jones Sarah Bowen, Denholm Mary, Stewart Georgia, Bedair Ahmed, Lindsay Colin R, Harrow Stephen, Faivre-Finn Corinne, McAleese Jonathan, Hanna Gerard G, Hackshaw Allan, McDonald Fiona, Walls Gerard M
Department of Clinical Oncology, Cancer Centre Belfast City Hospital, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Department of Thoracic Oncology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
JTO Clin Res Rep. 2024 Nov 22;6(4):100774. doi: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2024.100774. eCollection 2025 Apr.
Radiation therapy (RT) is central to the management of unresectable stage I to III NSCLC. However, the impact of actionable genetic driver alterations (AGAs) on locoregional control (LRC) from RT remains uncertain. A retrospective, multicenter real-world study was undertaken to determine if common AGAs impact LRC after RT.
Patients who received curative-intent RT for NSCLC between 2018 and 2020 at four centers in the United Kingdom and had available molecular testing were included. Locoregional control was compared in a 1:2 ratio between a group of patients with an AGA and a control group without AGAs. Locoregional control was assessed with competing risks analysis and overall survival was analyzed by Cox regression, adjusting for established prognostic clinical factors.
Data was collected for 185 eligible patients: 50 with an AGA and 135 without. Baseline characteristics, including patient demographics, tumor features, and treatment details were evenly distributed between the two groups. LRC was similar in the AGA and non-AGA groups (39% versus 34%, hazard ratio = 1.13, 95% confidence interval: 0.61-1.984, = 0.84). Actionable genetic driver alterations were not associated with LRC according to multivariable regression analysis. Median overall survival was significantly higher in the AGA group (45 mo versus 26 mo, hazard ratio = 0.64, 95% confidence interval: 0.43-0.96, = 0.044), and all these patients received targeted therapies on relapse.
LRC was comparable in the AGA and non-AGA groups suggesting that there is no role for personalization of RT dose solely due to the detection of an AGA. Nevertheless, survival rates were notably higher among patients with AGAs, likely owing to the availability of efficacious targeted therapies on relapse.
放射治疗(RT)是不可切除的I至III期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)治疗的核心。然而,可操作的基因驱动改变(AGA)对RT局部区域控制(LRC)的影响仍不确定。开展了一项回顾性、多中心真实世界研究,以确定常见AGA是否会影响RT后的LRC。
纳入2018年至2020年期间在英国四个中心接受根治性意图RT治疗NSCLC且有可用分子检测结果的患者。将一组有AGA的患者与一组无AGA的对照组按1:2的比例比较局部区域控制情况。采用竞争风险分析评估局部区域控制情况,并通过Cox回归分析总生存期,同时对既定的预后临床因素进行校正。
收集了185例符合条件患者的数据:50例有AGA,135例无AGA。两组之间的基线特征,包括患者人口统计学、肿瘤特征和治疗细节分布均匀。AGA组和非AGA组的LRC相似(39%对34%,风险比 = 1.13,95%置信区间:0.61 - 1.984,P = 0.84)。根据多变量回归分析,可操作的基因驱动改变与LRC无关。AGA组的中位总生存期显著更高(45个月对26个月,风险比 = 0.64,95%置信区间:0.43 - 0.96,P = 0.044),所有这些患者在复发时均接受了靶向治疗。
AGA组和非AGA组的LRC相当,这表明仅因检测到AGA而对RT剂量进行个体化并无作用。然而,有AGA的患者生存率明显更高,这可能是由于复发时可获得有效的靶向治疗。