Antwi-Amoabeng Daniel, Beutler Bryce D, Neelam Vijay, Gbadebo T David
CHRISTUS Ochsner St. Patrick Hospital Lake Charles Louisiana USA.
Department of Radiology University of California, San Francisco San Francisco California USA.
J Arrhythm. 2025 Jun 3;41(3):e70104. doi: 10.1002/joa3.70104. eCollection 2025 Jun.
Racial disparities exist in access to cardiovascular interventions, including atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. This study evaluates trends and disparities among racial and ethnic groups in the United States over a five-year period.
We conducted a cross-sectional analysis using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 2016 to 2020. Hospitalized AF patients undergoing ablation were identified using ICD-10 codes. Trends in ablation were assessed across racial groups, and multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate the predictors of cardiac ablation utilization. Time-to-ablation disparities were further analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression.
White patients had the highest ablation rates (1.08%) followed by Native Americans (1.03%), while Black patients had the lowest ablation rates (0.9%). A significant 52.6% increase in ablation utilization was observed over the study period ( < .001), yet racial disparities remained unchanged. Black (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.61, 95% CI: 0.56-0.64) and Hispanic (aOR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.77-0.88) patients had significantly lower odds of undergoing AF ablation compared to White patients. Black patients with higher comorbid disease burden, severe obesity, and protein-calorie malnutrition were less likely to have AF ablation and experienced significant wait times (additional 1.3 days) before receiving ablation in time-to-procedure analysis.
While the overall rate of AF ablation has increased over time, persistent racial disparities in procedure utilization remain. Hospital location and bed size, socioeconomic factors, and comorbid medical conditions contribute to these disparities, underscoring the need for targeted interventions to close the gap in AF care.
在获得心血管介入治疗(包括心房颤动(AF)消融)方面存在种族差异。本研究评估了美国五年期间不同种族和族裔群体的趋势及差异。
我们使用2016年至2020年的全国住院患者样本(NIS)数据库进行了横断面分析。使用国际疾病分类第十版(ICD - 10)编码识别接受消融治疗的住院AF患者。评估了各种族群体消融治疗的趋势,并使用多变量逻辑回归模型评估心脏消融治疗利用的预测因素。使用Cox比例风险回归进一步分析消融治疗时间的差异。
白人患者的消融率最高(1.08%),其次是美国原住民(1.03%),而黑人患者的消融率最低(0.9%)。在研究期间,消融治疗的利用率显著增加了52.6%(<0.001),但种族差异仍然没有改变。与白人患者相比,黑人(调整后的优势比(aOR)为0.61,95%置信区间:0.56 - 0.64)和西班牙裔(aOR为0.83,95%置信区间:0.77 - 0.88)患者接受AF消融治疗的几率显著较低。在手术时间分析中,合并疾病负担较重、严重肥胖和蛋白质 - 热量营养不良的黑人患者接受AF消融治疗的可能性较小,并且在接受消融治疗之前经历了显著的等待时间(额外增加了1.3天)。
虽然随着时间的推移AF消融治疗的总体率有所增加,但在手术利用率方面持续存在种族差异。医院位置和床位规模、社会经济因素以及合并的医疗状况导致了这些差异,这突出了需要有针对性的干预措施来缩小AF治疗方面的差距。