Suppr超能文献

消融与药物治疗在少数民族人群中的心房颤动。

Ablation Versus Drug Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation in Racial and Ethnic Minorities.

机构信息

Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Jul 13;78(2):126-138. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.04.092.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Rhythm control strategies for atrial fibrillation (AF), including catheter ablation, are substantially underused in racial/ethnic minorities in North America.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to describe outcomes in the CABANA trial as a function of race/ethnicity.

METHODS

CABANA randomized 2,204 symptomatic participants with AF to ablation or drug therapy including rate and/or rhythm control drugs. Only participants in North America were included in the present analysis, and participants were subgrouped as racial/ethnic minority or nonminority with the use of National Institutes of Health definitions. The primary endpoint was a composite of death, disabling stroke, serious bleeding, or cardiac arrest.

RESULTS

Of 1,280 participants enrolled in CABANA in North America, 127 (9.9%) were racial and ethnic minorities. Compared with nonminorities, racial and ethnic minorities were younger with median age 65.6 versus 68.5 years, respectively, and had more symptomatic heart failure (37.0% vs 22.0%), hypertension (92.1% vs 76.8%, respectively), and ejection fraction <40% (20.8% vs 7.1%). Racial/ethnic minorities treated with ablation had a 68% relative reduction in the primary endpoint (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.32; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.13-0.78) and a 72% relative reduction in all-cause mortality (aHR: 0.28; 95% CI: 0.10-0.79). Primary event rates in racial/ethnic minority and nonminority participants were similar in the ablation arm (4-year Kaplan-Meier event rates 12.3% vs 9.9%); however, racial and ethnic minorities randomized to drug therapy had a much higher event rate than nonminority participants (27.4% vs. 9.4%).

CONCLUSION

Among racial or ethnic minorities enrolled in the North American CABANA cohort, catheter ablation significantly improved major clinical outcomes compared with drug therapy. These benefits, which were not seen in nonminority participants, appear to be due to worse outcomes with drug therapy. (Catheter Ablation vs Anti-arrhythmic Drug Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation Trial [CABANA]; NCT00911508).

摘要

背景

北美的房颤(AF)节律控制策略,包括导管消融,在种族/少数民族中基本未被广泛应用。

目的

本研究旨在根据种族/民族情况描述 CABANA 试验的结果。

方法

CABANA 将 2204 名有症状的 AF 患者随机分为消融或药物治疗组,包括控制心率和/或节律的药物。本分析仅纳入北美参与者,使用美国国立卫生研究院的定义将参与者分为少数民族或非少数民族亚组。主要终点是死亡、致残性卒中、严重出血或心脏骤停的复合终点。

结果

在北美纳入的 CABANA 2204 名参与者中,有 127 名(9.9%)为少数民族。与非少数民族相比,少数民族参与者更年轻,中位数年龄分别为 65.6 岁和 68.5 岁,有更多的症状性心力衰竭(37.0% vs 22.0%)、高血压(92.1% vs 76.8%)和射血分数<40%(20.8% vs 7.1%)。接受消融治疗的少数民族患者主要终点的相对风险降低了 68%(调整后的危险比 [aHR]:0.32;95%置信区间 [CI]:0.13-0.78),全因死亡率的相对风险降低了 72%(aHR:0.28;95%CI:0.10-0.79)。消融组中少数民族和非少数民族参与者的主要事件发生率相似(4 年 Kaplan-Meier 事件发生率分别为 12.3%和 9.9%);然而,随机分配至药物治疗的少数民族参与者的事件发生率远高于非少数民族参与者(27.4% vs. 9.4%)。

结论

在纳入北美 CABANA 队列的少数民族中,与药物治疗相比,导管消融显著改善了主要临床结局。这些益处在非少数民族参与者中并未见到,似乎是由于药物治疗的结局较差所致。(房颤导管消融与抗心律失常药物治疗试验 [CABANA];NCT00911508)。

相似文献

1
Ablation Versus Drug Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation in Racial and Ethnic Minorities.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Jul 13;78(2):126-138. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.04.092.
3
Recurrence of Atrial Fibrillation After Catheter Ablation or Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy in the CABANA Trial.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Jun 30;75(25):3105-3118. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.04.065.
4
Ablation Versus Drug Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure: Results From the CABANA Trial.
Circulation. 2021 Apr 6;143(14):1377-1390. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.050991. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
5
Association Between Age and Outcomes of Catheter Ablation Versus Medical Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation: Results From the CABANA Trial.
Circulation. 2022 Mar 15;145(11):796-804. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.055297. Epub 2021 Dec 22.
6
Influence of atrial fibrillation type on outcomes of ablation vs. drug therapy: results from CABANA.
Europace. 2022 Oct 13;24(9):1430-1440. doi: 10.1093/europace/euac055.
7
Regional differences in outcomes with ablation versus drug therapy for atrial fibrillation: Results from the CABANA trial.
Am Heart J. 2024 Apr;270:103-116. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2024.01.009. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
9
Prognostic Impact of Sinus Rhythm in Atrial Fibrillation Patients: Separating Rhythm Outcomes From Randomized Strategy Findings From the CABANA Trial.
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2024 May;17(5):e012697. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.123.012697. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
10
Catheter Ablation versus Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation (CABANA) Trial: Study Rationale and Design.
Am Heart J. 2018 May;199:192-199. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.02.015. Epub 2018 Mar 7.

引用本文的文献

2
Temporal trends and racial disparities in atrial fibrillation ablation: A 5-year study.
J Arrhythm. 2025 Jun 3;41(3):e70104. doi: 10.1002/joa3.70104. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Healthcare Expenditure on Atrial Fibrillation in the United States: The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey 2016 to 2021.
JACC Adv. 2025 May;4(5):101716. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101716. Epub 2025 Apr 25.
6
Racial and Ethnic Differences in Initiation and Discontinuation of Antiarrhythmic Medications in Management of Atrial Fibrillation.
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2024 Mar 27;16:197-208. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S457992. eCollection 2024.
10
Ablation to Reduce Atrial Fibrillation Burden and Improve Outcomes: JACC Review Topic of the Week.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023 Sep 5;82(10):1039-1050. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.06.029.

本文引用的文献

1
Ablation Versus Drug Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure: Results From the CABANA Trial.
Circulation. 2021 Apr 6;143(14):1377-1390. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.050991. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
2
Atrial fibrillation burden and heart failure: Data from 39,710 individuals with cardiac implanted electronic devices.
Heart Rhythm. 2021 May;18(5):709-716. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.01.021. Epub 2021 Jan 26.
3
Racial Disproportionality in Covid Clinical Trials.
N Engl J Med. 2020 Aug 27;383(9):e59. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2021971. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
4
Recurrence of Atrial Fibrillation After Catheter Ablation or Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy in the CABANA Trial.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Jun 30;75(25):3105-3118. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.04.065.
5
Under-Reporting and Under-Representation of Racial/Ethnic Minorities in Major Atrial Fibrillation Clinical Trials.
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2020 Jun;6(6):739-741. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2020.03.001.
6
2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: Executive summary.
Heart Rhythm. 2017 Oct;14(10):e445-e494. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.07.009. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
7
Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Heart Failure.
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Jul 2;171(1):76-77. doi: 10.7326/L19-0282.
8
Atrial fibrillation ablation in practice: assessing CABANA generalizability.
Eur Heart J. 2019 Apr 21;40(16):1257-1264. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz085.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验