Suppr超能文献

在机会性骨质疏松症筛查中,简化矢状位切片HU测量作为传统轴向HU测量的一种实用替代方法。

Simplified sagittal slice HU measurement as a practical alternative to conventional axial HU in opportunistic osteoporosis screening.

作者信息

Hiyama Akihiko, Sakai Daisuke, Katoh Hiroyuki, Sato Masato, Watanabe Masahiko

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2025 Jun 4. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-09013-6.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Opportunistic assessment of bone quality using CT-derived Hounsfield Unit (HU) values has gained attention as an alternative to DXA-based osteoporosis screening. However, conventional axial HU measurements are time-consuming and operator-dependent. A simplified sagittal HU measurement method may provide a more practical approach, although its clinical validity has yet to be fully established. This study aimed to evaluate the correlation between HU values obtained from simplified sagittal and conventional axial slices and determine their respective diagnostic performance in identifying osteoporosis.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 162 patients aged ≥ 50 years who underwent both lumbar spine CT and DXA scans. HU values were measured using both conventional axial slices (Ax L1-4 Ave HU) and a simplified sagittal slice method (Sg L1-4 Ave HU). Spearman's rank correlation was calculated to assess the association between each HU measurement and the lowest T-score (Low-T score). Agreement between the two methods was evaluated using Bland-Altman analysis, and the predictive performance for diagnosing osteoporosis (Low T-score ≤ - 2.5) was assessed by ROC curve analysis. Vertebra-specific differences between axial and sagittal HU values were also analyzed.

RESULTS

Sg L1-4 Ave HU showed a moderate correlation with Low T-score (ρ = 0.476), comparable to Ax L1-4 Ave HU (ρ = 0.493). The Bland-Altman analysis revealed a mean difference of - 4.08 HU between Sg and Ax measurements, with most differences falling within the 95% limits of agreement. Axial HU values were consistently higher than sagittal HU values across all lumbar levels, particularly at L1 and L4. The AUC for predicting osteoporosis was 0.692 for Sg L1-4 Ave HU and 0.707 for Ax L1-4 Ave HU. Based on Youden's index, the optimal cutoff values were 94.0 HU for sagittal and 99.5 HU for axial measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

Simplified sagittal HU measurements demonstrated good agreement with conventional axial measurements and exhibited similar diagnostic accuracy in identifying osteoporosis. Given their efficiency and consistency, sagittal HU values may serve as a practical and reproducible alternative for CT-based opportunistic bone quality assessment, especially in routine clinical settings or where DXA is unavailable.

摘要

目的

利用CT衍生的亨氏单位(HU)值对骨质量进行机会性评估,作为基于双能X线吸收法(DXA)的骨质疏松症筛查的替代方法,已受到关注。然而,传统的轴向HU测量既耗时又依赖操作人员。一种简化的矢状面HU测量方法可能提供一种更实用的方法,尽管其临床有效性尚未完全确立。本研究旨在评估从简化矢状面和传统轴位切片获得的HU值之间的相关性,并确定它们在识别骨质疏松症方面各自的诊断性能。

方法

我们回顾性分析了162例年龄≥50岁且同时接受腰椎CT和DXA扫描的患者。使用传统轴位切片(Ax L1-4 Ave HU)和简化矢状面切片方法(Sg L1-4 Ave HU)测量HU值。计算Spearman等级相关性以评估每个HU测量值与最低T值(Low-T score)之间的关联。使用Bland-Altman分析评估两种方法之间的一致性,并通过ROC曲线分析评估诊断骨质疏松症(Low T-score≤-2.5)的预测性能。还分析了轴向和矢状面HU值之间的椎体特异性差异。

结果

Sg L1-4 Ave HU与Low T-score显示出中等相关性(ρ=0.476),与Ax L1-4 Ave HU相当(ρ=0.493)。Bland-Altman分析显示,Sg和Ax测量值之间的平均差异为-4.08 HU,大多数差异落在95%一致性界限内。在所有腰椎水平,轴向HU值始终高于矢状面HU值,尤其是在L1和L4。Sg L1-4 Ave HU预测骨质疏松症的AUC为0.692,Ax L1-4 Ave HU为0.707。根据约登指数,矢状面测量的最佳截断值为94.0 HU,轴向测量为99.5 HU。

结论

简化的矢状面HU测量与传统轴向测量显示出良好的一致性,并且在识别骨质疏松症方面表现出相似的诊断准确性。鉴于其效率和一致性,矢状面HU值可作为基于CT的机会性骨质量评估的实用且可重复的替代方法,特别是在常规临床环境或无法进行DXA的情况下。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验