Moody Danielle L Beatty, Pantesco Elizabeth J, Novruz Ayla, Tchangalova Nedelina, Sadler Richard C, White Whilby Kellee, Ashe Jason, Gee Gilbert C, Hill LaBarron K, Waldstein Shari R
School of Social Work, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
(Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences), Villanova University, Villanova, PA, USA.
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2025 Jun 4;27(1):91. doi: 10.1007/s11886-025-02238-3.
In the last two decades, empirical research has significantly advanced our understanding of the link between discrimination and cardiovascular disease (CVD). This integrated scoping and narrative literature review delineates the extant peer-reviewed research on discrimination and clinical and subclinical CVD in samples that include Black adults, using a multilevel conceptualization of race-related discrimination and racism. We also identify potential intermediary mechanisms in the racism-CVD relationship and propose a comprehensive future research agenda.
Using the Population, Exposure and Outcome framework and PRISMA guidelines, we identified 37 empirical reports for inclusion drawn from 1900 to 2024. The bulk of the literature has focused on discrimination and racism that occurs at the interpersonal level (28 studies), while a smaller but growing body of work has examined cultural (5 studies) or institutional and structural-level racism and discrimination (4 studies) in relation to CVD risk. The majority of these studies show that greater exposure to discrimination or racism is associated with increased clinical or subclinical CVD risk. Potential pathways include societal, environmental, psychological, and biological factors; however, few studies have conducted formal tests of mediation. The literature suggests robust relations of multilevel racism and discrimination to manifestations of CVD across diverse exposure and outcome measures in Black adults. Our recommendations to eliminate cardiovascular health inequities in Black communities include enhancing academic scholarship training, securing targeted and protected funding, and adopting more robust methodological approaches.
在过去二十年中,实证研究极大地推进了我们对歧视与心血管疾病(CVD)之间联系的理解。本综合范围界定和叙述性文献综述描绘了在包括黑人成年人的样本中,关于歧视与临床及亚临床CVD的现有同行评审研究,采用了与种族相关的歧视和种族主义的多层次概念化。我们还确定了种族主义与CVD关系中的潜在中介机制,并提出了一个全面的未来研究议程。
使用人群、暴露和结果框架以及PRISMA指南,我们确定了1900年至2024年期间纳入的37份实证报告。大部分文献聚焦于人际层面发生的歧视和种族主义(28项研究),而研究文化层面(5项研究)或与CVD风险相关的制度和结构层面的种族主义和歧视(4项研究)的工作虽较少但在不断增加。这些研究大多表明,更多地暴露于歧视或种族主义与临床或亚临床CVD风险增加有关。潜在途径包括社会、环境、心理和生物学因素;然而,很少有研究进行正式的中介检验。文献表明,多层次的种族主义和歧视与黑人成年人在不同暴露和结果测量下的CVD表现之间存在密切关系。我们消除黑人社区心血管健康不平等的建议包括加强学术奖学金培训、确保有针对性的和受保护的资金,以及采用更有力的方法学途径。