Suppr超能文献

预防性心脏去神经支配以预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Prophylactic cardiac denervation to prevent post-operative atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Ali Junaid, Khan Muhammad Haris, Majeed Zuhair, Elsnhory Ahmed Bostamy, Argueta Allan Edgardo Santos, Afiridi Leenah, Nawaz Anum, Abuelazm Mohamed, Khan Ubaid, Aamir Muhammad, Dani Sourbha

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Saint Peter's University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.

Department of Medicine, Saidu Medical College, Swat, Pakistan.

出版信息

J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2025 Jun 4. doi: 10.1007/s10840-025-02076-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite revolutionary advances in the field of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), a significant number of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) require coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), which is associated with postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) risk. This meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of prophylactic cardiac denervation (PCD) during CABG to prevent POAF.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, CENTRAL, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase until December 2024. Pooled data were reported using risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes, with a 95% confidence interval (CI). This systematic review and meta-analysis is registered with PROSPERO ID: CRD42025631310.

RESULTS

Five studies with 1266 patients were included in the final analysis. Compared to CABG alone, CABG plus PCD did not show any significant difference in the incidence of POAF (RR 0.77, [95% CI 0.38, 1.56], p = 0.47, I = 83%) and all-cause mortality (RR 0.70, [95% CI 0.19, 2.51], p = 0.58, I = 0). Additionally, there was no significant difference between both groups in cross-clamp time (MD: 0.68, [95% CI - 1.22, 2.57], p = 0.48, I = 26%), cardiopulmonary bypass time (MD - 0.04 [95% CI - 5.29, 5.21], p = 0.99, I = 82%), length of hospital stay (MD - 0.13 [95% CI - 0.55, 0.29], p = 0.54, I = 59%), blood loss (MD 2.22, [95% CI - 23.60, 28.03], p = 0.87, I = 0%), and number of grafts (MD 0.21, [95% CI - 0.07, 0.49], p = 0.13, I = 91%).

CONCLUSION

CABG with adjuvant PCD did not show significant efficacy in preventing the incidence of POAF compared to CABG alone. This calls for further research focusing on investigating combined preventive strategies, rather than relying solely on PCD, and developing risk stratification tools to identify patients most likely to benefit from autonomic modulation.

摘要

背景

尽管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)领域取得了革命性进展,但仍有相当数量的冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者需要进行冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG),而该手术与术后房颤(POAF)风险相关。本荟萃分析评估了CABG期间预防性心脏去神经支配(PCD)预防POAF的疗效和安全性。

方法

截至2024年12月,在PubMed、CENTRAL、科学网、Scopus和Embase上进行了系统检索。汇总数据采用二分类结局的风险比(RR)和连续结局的平均差(MD)报告,并给出95%置信区间(CI)。本系统评价和荟萃分析已在PROSPERO注册,注册号:CRD42025631310。

结果

最终分析纳入了5项研究,共1266例患者。与单纯CABG相比,CABG联合PCD在POAF发生率(RR 0.77,[95%CI 0.38,1.56],p = 0.47,I = 83%)和全因死亡率(RR 0.70,[95%CI 0.19,2.51],p = 0.58,I = 0)方面未显示出显著差异。此外,两组在主动脉阻断时间(MD:0.68,[95%CI -1.22,2.57],p = 0.48,I = 26%)、体外循环时间(MD -0.04 [95%CI -5.29,5.21],p = 0.99,I = 82%)、住院时间(MD -0.1

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验