Mamounas Eleftherios P, Bandos Hanna, White Julia R, Julian Thomas B, Khan Atif J, Shaitelman Simona F, Torres Mylin A, Vicini Frank A, Ganz Patricia A, McCloskey Susan A, Lucas Peter C, Gupta Nilendu, Li X Allen, McCormick Beryl, Smith Benjamin, Tendulkar Rahul D, Kavadi Vivek S, Matsumoto Koji, Seaward Samantha Andrews, Irvin William J, Lin Jolinta Y, Mutter Robert W, Muanza Thierry M, Stromberg Jannifer, Jagsi Reshma, Weiss Anna C, Curran Walter J, Wolmark Norman
AdventHealth Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL.
NRG Oncology Statistical and Data Management Center, Pittsburgh.
N Engl J Med. 2025 Jun 5;392(21):2113-2124. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2414859.
The benefit of regional nodal irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer is well established for patients with pathologically positive axillary nodes, but whether it is also beneficial for patients whose nodes become pathologically tumor free (ypN0) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy remains unclear.
We evaluated whether regional nodal irradiation improves outcomes in patients with biopsy-proven, node-positive breast cancer who reach ypN0 status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients with breast cancer with a clinical stage of T1 to T3 (tumor size, ≤2 cm to >5 cm), N1, and M0 (indicating spread to one to three axillary lymph nodes but no distant metastasis) who had ypN0 status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were randomly assigned to receive regional nodal irradiation or no regional nodal irradiation. The primary end point was the interval of freedom from invasive breast cancer recurrence or death from breast cancer (invasive breast cancer recurrence-free interval). Secondary end points included the locoregional recurrence-free interval, the distant recurrence-free interval, disease-free survival, and overall survival. Safety was also assessed.
A total of 1641 patients were enrolled in the trial; 1556 were included in the primary-event analysis: 772 in the irradiation group and 784 in the no-irradiation group. After a median follow-up of 59.5 months, 109 primary end-point events (50 in the irradiation group and 59 in the no-irradiation group) had occurred. Regional nodal irradiation did not significantly increase the invasive breast cancer recurrence-free interval (hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.60 to 1.28; P = 0.51). Point estimates of survival free from the primary end-point events were 92.7% in the irradiation group and 91.8% in the no-irradiation group. Regional nodal irradiation did not increase the locoregional recurrence-free interval, the distant recurrence-free interval, disease-free survival, or overall survival. No deaths related to the protocol-specified therapy were reported, and no unexpected adverse events were observed. Grade 4 adverse events occurred in 0.5% of patients in the irradiation group and 0.1% of those in the no-irradiation group.
The addition of adjuvant regional nodal irradiation did not decrease the risk of invasive breast cancer recurrence or death from breast cancer in patients who had negative axillary nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health; NSABP B-51-Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 1304 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01872975.).
区域淋巴结照射对腋窝淋巴结病理检查呈阳性的乳腺癌患者治疗有益,这已得到充分证实,但对于新辅助化疗后淋巴结病理检查无肿瘤(ypN0)的患者是否有益仍不清楚。
我们评估了区域淋巴结照射是否能改善经活检证实的淋巴结阳性乳腺癌患者在新辅助化疗后达到ypN0状态时的预后。临床分期为T1至T3(肿瘤大小,≤2 cm至>5 cm)、N1和M0(表明已扩散至一至三个腋窝淋巴结但无远处转移)且新辅助化疗后为ypN0状态的乳腺癌患者被随机分配接受区域淋巴结照射或不接受区域淋巴结照射。主要终点是无侵袭性乳腺癌复发或乳腺癌死亡的间隔时间(侵袭性乳腺癌无复发生存期)。次要终点包括局部区域无复发生存期、远处无复发生存期、无病生存期和总生存期。还评估了安全性。
共有1641例患者纳入该试验;1556例纳入主要事件分析:照射组772例,非照射组78�例。中位随访59.5个月后,发生了109例主要终点事件(照射组50例,非照射组59例)。区域淋巴结照射未显著延长侵袭性乳腺癌无复发生存期(风险比,0.88;95%置信区间,0.60至1.28;P = 0.51)。照射组和非照射组从主要终点事件中无病生存的点估计值分别为92.7%和91.8%。区域淋巴结照射未延长局部区域无复发生存期、远处无复发生存期、无病生存期或总生存期。未报告与方案规定治疗相关的死亡病例,也未观察到意外不良事件。照射组0.5%的患者和非照射组0.1%的患者发生4级不良事件。
对于新辅助化疗后腋窝淋巴结阴性的患者,加用辅助性区域淋巴结照射并不能降低侵袭性乳腺癌复发或乳腺癌死亡的风险。(由美国国立卫生研究院资助;NSABP B - 51 - 放射治疗肿瘤学组1304。ClinicalTrials.gov编号,NCT01872975。)