Penkoske P A, Neches W H, Anderson R H, Zuberbuhler J R
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1985 Oct;90(4):611-22.
Certain morphologic aspects of atrioventricular septal defects ("endocardial cushion defects," "atrioventricular canal malformations") remain controversial. It is still not clear which precise lesions should not be placed in this category. For example, is an "isolated" cleft of the mitral valve or a perimembranous inlet ventricular septal defect to be so described? It is also not fully accepted that the left atrioventricular valve in these lesions bears little resemblance to a morphologically mitral valve. We have investigated these problems by both observation and mensuration. We determined the junctional circumference of the left atrioventricular valve leaflets and the ventricular dimensions in 130 atrioventricular septal defects (95 with common valve orifice and 35 with separate right and left atrioventricular orifices); in 50 hearts with perimembranous ventricular septal defects (20 extending into the inlet septum and 30 with outlet or trabecular extensions); in seven hearts with isolated cleft of the mitral valve, and in 10 normal hearts. All specimens came from the cardiopathological collection of Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh. The measurements showed conclusively that the atrioventricular septal defects were all directly comparable irrespective of the detailed morphology of the atrioventricular valve or valves. The group of atrioventricular septal defects was totally discrete as compared with all the other specimens that had normal atrioventricular septation. The left atrioventricular valve in atrioventricular septal defects is basically a three-leaflet valve which differs from the normal mitral valve in terms of its leaflet, its chordal support, and the arrangement of its papillary muscle. Its only similarity with the normal mitral valve is that it resides in the morphologically left ventricle and guards the left atrioventricular junction.
房室间隔缺损(“心内膜垫缺损”、“房室管畸形”)的某些形态学方面仍存在争议。目前仍不清楚哪些确切病变不应归为此类。例如,二尖瓣的“孤立”裂隙或膜周部流入道室间隔缺损是否应如此描述?这些病变中的左房室瓣与形态学上的二尖瓣几乎没有相似之处这一点也未被完全接受。我们通过观察和测量对这些问题进行了研究。我们测定了130例房室间隔缺损(95例有共同瓣口,35例有分开的右房室和左房室瓣口)、50例有膜周部室间隔缺损(20例延伸至流入道间隔,30例有流出道或小梁部延伸)、7例有二尖瓣孤立裂隙的心脏以及10例正常心脏的左房室瓣叶交界周长和心室尺寸。所有标本均来自匹兹堡儿童医院的心脏病理收藏。测量结果确凿地表明,无论房室瓣的详细形态如何,房室间隔缺损都是直接可比的。与所有其他房室间隔正常的标本相比,房室间隔缺损组是完全不同的。房室间隔缺损中的左房室瓣基本上是三叶瓣,在瓣叶、腱索支持和乳头肌排列方面与正常二尖瓣不同。它与正常二尖瓣唯一的相似之处在于它位于形态学上的左心室并守护左房室交界。