• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在意大利辅助使用吡仑帕奈治疗局灶性发作的真实世界应用:吡仑帕奈在成人和青少年中的镜像临床实践研究(AMPA)

Real-world use of adjunctive perampanel for focal-onset seizures in Italy: A mirroring clinical practice study of perampanel in adults and adolescents (AMPA).

作者信息

D'Aniello Alfredo, Giallonardo Anna Teresa, Tinuper Paolo, Mecarelli Oriano, Aguglia Umberto, Assenza Giovanni, Gambardella Antonio, Canevini Maria Paola, Scifo Renato, Meletti Stefano, De Giorgis Valentina, Bonanni Enrica, Michelucci Roberto, Cerminara Caterina, Romeo Antonino, Vigevano Federico, Operto Francesca Felicia, Tramacere Luciana, Di Gennaro Giancarlo, Ngo Leock Y, Patten Anna, Gentile Anna Lisa, Pecori Andrea, Goldman Samantha

机构信息

Department of Epilepsy, IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Mediterraneo Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy.

Department of Human Neurosciences, Epilepsy Centre, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Epilepsia Open. 2025 Jun 4. doi: 10.1002/epi4.70068.

DOI:10.1002/epi4.70068
PMID:40468531
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The AMPA study (Study 501; NCT04257604) was a multicenter, prospective, 12-month observational study in Italy that evaluated the effectiveness and safety of adjunctive perampanel in patients with focal-onset seizures (FOS), with or without focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (FBTCS).

METHODS

Patients aged ≥12 years with insufficiently controlled FOS, with or without FBTCS, receiving 1-3 anti-seizure medications (ASMs) were prescribed adjunctive perampanel per the approved indication. The primary endpoint was the median percent change in total seizure frequency per 28 days from baseline at Month 6. Baseline seizure frequency per 28 days was calculated using seizure diaries and/or medical records of seizures occurring in the 8 weeks prior to the baseline visit while patients were receiving 1-3 ASMs. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), including serious TEAEs, were monitored for up to 12 months.

RESULTS

Of the 240 patients enrolled in the study, 234 were included in the Full and Safety Analysis Sets. Median age (minimum, maximum) was 36.0 years (12, 84) and 51.3% (n = 120/234) were female. The majority of patients (77.8% [n = 182/234]) received ≥2 concomitant ASMs at baseline, with the most common being carbamazepine (33.8% [n = 79/234]). The median percent reduction in total seizure frequency per 28 days from baseline (95% confidence interval) was 55.4% (46.7%-66.7%) at Month 6. Overall, the retention rate was 57.3% (n = 134/234) following 12 months of treatment. During the study, the overall incidence of TEAEs was 56.4% (n = 132/234), with the most frequently reported TEAE being dizziness/vertigo (21.8% [n = 51/234]). Serious TEAEs were experienced by 6.0% (n = 14/234) of patients and no deaths were reported during the 12-month treatment period.

SIGNIFICANCE

Data from the AMPA study suggest that adjunctive perampanel is associated with improvement in seizure control and with good retention rates and tolerability in a real-world clinical setting. These findings further support the use of adjunctive perampanel as a suitable treatment option for adolescent and adult patients with epilepsy.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

Our study looked at teenage and adult patients with epilepsy in Italy who took the study drug, called perampanel, as well as the epilepsy treatments they had already been prescribed. After 12 months, 134 out of 234 patients were still using perampanel. Patients taking perampanel had fewer seizures than they did before they started taking perampanel. Side effects occurred in 132 patients (most commonly dizziness/vertigo, irritability, and sleepiness) and caused 45 of them to withdraw from the study. Perampanel was a suitable treatment option for teenage and adult patients with epilepsy.

摘要

目的

AMPA研究(研究501;NCT04257604)是一项在意大利进行的多中心、前瞻性、为期12个月的观察性研究,评估了辅助使用吡仑帕奈治疗局灶性发作(FOS)患者(伴或不伴有继发全面性强直-阵挛发作(FBTCS))的有效性和安全性。

方法

年龄≥12岁、FOS控制不佳(伴或不伴有FBTCS)且正在接受1 - 3种抗癫痫药物(ASM)治疗的患者,根据批准的适应症给予辅助使用吡仑帕奈。主要终点是第6个月时每28天总发作频率相对于基线的中位数变化百分比。每28天的基线发作频率是使用发作日记和/或基线访视前8周内患者接受1 - 3种ASM治疗时发生的发作的病历记录来计算的。对治疗中出现的不良事件(TEAE),包括严重TEAE,进行长达12个月的监测。

结果

该研究共纳入240例患者,其中234例纳入全分析集和安全性分析集。中位年龄(最小值,最大值)为36.0岁(12, 84),51.3%(n = 120/234)为女性。大多数患者(77.8% [n = 182/234])在基线时接受≥2种联合ASM治疗,最常见的是卡马西平(33.8% [n = 79/234])。第6个月时每28天总发作频率相对于基线的中位数降低百分比(95%置信区间)为55.4%(46.7% - 66.7%)。总体而言,治疗随访12个月后的保留率为57.3%(n = 134/234)。在研究期间,TEAE的总体发生率为56.4%(n = 132/234),最常报告的TEAE是头晕/眩晕(21.8% [n = 51/234])。6.0%(n = 14/234)的患者经历了严重TEAE,在12个月的治疗期内未报告死亡病例。

意义

AMPA研究的数据表明,在真实世界的临床环境中,辅助使用吡仑帕奈与改善癫痫控制、良好的保留率和耐受性相关。这些发现进一步支持将辅助使用吡仑帕奈作为青少年和成年癫痫患者的一种合适治疗选择。

通俗易懂的总结

我们的研究观察了意大利的青少年和成年癫痫患者,他们服用了名为吡仑帕奈的研究药物以及他们已经被处方的癫痫治疗药物。12个月后,234例患者中有134例仍在使用吡仑帕奈。服用吡仑帕奈的患者发作次数比开始服用吡仑帕奈前减少。132例患者出现了副作用(最常见的是头晕/眩晕、易怒和嗜睡),其中45例因此退出研究。吡仑帕奈是青少年和成年癫痫患者的一种合适治疗选择。

相似文献

1
Real-world use of adjunctive perampanel for focal-onset seizures in Italy: A mirroring clinical practice study of perampanel in adults and adolescents (AMPA).在意大利辅助使用吡仑帕奈治疗局灶性发作的真实世界应用:吡仑帕奈在成人和青少年中的镜像临床实践研究(AMPA)
Epilepsia Open. 2025 Jun 4. doi: 10.1002/epi4.70068.
2
Effectiveness of perampanel as the only adjunctive anti-seizure medication in adults: Final results from the observational PERPRISE study in Germany.吡仑帕奈作为成人唯一辅助抗癫痫药物的有效性:德国观察性PERPRISE研究的最终结果。
Epilepsia Open. 2025 Aug 21. doi: 10.1002/epi4.70117.
3
Long-term efficacy and safety of perampanel monotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed or currently untreated recurrent focal-onset seizures: Results from the open-label extension phase of FREEDOM (Study 342).吡仑帕奈单药治疗新诊断或当前未治疗的局灶性发作性癫痫患者的长期疗效和安全性:FREEDOM开放标签延长期(研究342)的结果
Epilepsy Res. 2025 Feb;210:107494. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107494. Epub 2024 Dec 20.
4
Antiepileptic drug monotherapy for epilepsy: a network meta-analysis of individual participant data.抗癫痫药物单药治疗癫痫:一项个体参与者数据的网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 1;4(4):CD011412. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011412.pub4.
5
Third-Generation Antiseizure Medications for Adjunctive Treatment of Focal-Onset Seizures in Adults: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.第三代抗癫痫药物辅助治疗成人局灶性发作:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Drugs. 2022 Feb;82(2):199-218. doi: 10.1007/s40265-021-01661-4. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
6
Effectiveness of perampanel as only concomitant antiseizure medication for highly active epilepsy: insight from a real-world, multicenter retrospective study.吡仑帕奈作为高度活跃性癫痫唯一辅助抗癫痫药物的有效性:来自一项真实世界、多中心回顾性研究的见解
J Neurol. 2025 Jun 7;272(7):449. doi: 10.1007/s00415-025-13184-z.
7
Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Adjunctive Brivaracetam in Japanese and Chinese Patients with Focal-Onset Seizures: Interim Analysis of a Phase 3 Open-Label Extension Trial.辅助性布瓦西坦在日本和中国局灶性发作患者中的安全性、耐受性和疗效:一项3期开放标签扩展试验的中期分析
Adv Ther. 2025 Jun 23. doi: 10.1007/s12325-025-03253-0.
8
Lamotrigine versus carbamazepine monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review.拉莫三嗪与卡马西平单药治疗癫痫的疗效比较:个体参与者数据回顾
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 28;6(6):CD001031. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001031.pub4.
9
Efficacy and Safety of adjunctive Perampanel in a prospective, real-world, Phase IV study in Indian patients aged ≥12 years for Treatment of focal-onset Epilepsy: Study 508.在一项针对≥12 岁的印度局灶性癫痫患者的前瞻性、真实世界、四期研究中,附加用吡仑帕奈的疗效和安全性:研究 508。
Epilepsia Open. 2024 Jun;9(3):940-950. doi: 10.1002/epi4.12885. Epub 2024 Mar 16.
10
Real-world effectiveness and tolerability of cenobamate in drug-resistant epilepsy: A retrospective analysis of the patients included into the Early Access Programs (EAP) in Germany, France, and United Kingdom.司替戊醇在耐药性癫痫中的真实世界有效性和耐受性:对德国、法国和英国早期准入项目(EAP)纳入患者的回顾性分析。
Epilepsia Open. 2025 Mar 22. doi: 10.1002/epi4.70021.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of therapeutic drug monitoring of perampanel for pediatrics with epilepsy: real-world data.小儿癫痫患者吡仑帕奈治疗药物监测的成本效益:真实世界数据
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Jun 30;16:1549069. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1549069. eCollection 2025.