• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非洲象觅食地重访的环境决定因素()

Environmental Determinants of Foraging Site Revisitation by African Elephants ().

作者信息

Jacob Suzanne Antoinette, De Boer Willem Frederik, De Knegt Henrik Johan, Engelen Cassander Cassijn, Henley Michelle

机构信息

Wildlife Ecology and Conservation Group Wageningen University Wageningen the Netherlands.

Elephants Alive Hoedspruit South Africa.

出版信息

Ecol Evol. 2025 Jun 3;15(6):e71506. doi: 10.1002/ece3.71506. eCollection 2025 Jun.

DOI:10.1002/ece3.71506
PMID:40469465
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12134087/
Abstract

Understanding the spatial patterns of herbivore habitat use is important for understanding ecological processes and ecosystem management. Past research has mainly focused on explaining herbivore habitat selection, to the extent that environmental variables driving habitat selection can be considered well researched. However, little is known about how environmental variables contribute to patterns of foraging site revisitation, even though revisited sites might represent sites of ecological significance. The increasing elephant population in South Africa is causing a decline in woody species, necessitating insight into elephant habitat use to improve the management of areas in which they occur. This study aimed to gain insight into the spatial patterns of foraging site revisitations by the African elephant (). To achieve this, the non-randomness of the spatial locations of revisited sites in terms of their environmental conditions was assessed. Next, the relations between these environmental variables and the revisitation rate per site were analysed. Lastly, a model was constructed to assess which environmental variables had the largest effect on site revisitations. Ten years of GPS tracking data of elephants in the Greater Kruger Area, South Africa, was used. Environmental variables were obtained from existing data sources. The data were analysed with Kolmogorov tests and linear mixed effects models, using AIC-based model selection. The results indicate that elephants select revisitation sites close to water and at intermediate slopes. Cows also selected revisitation sites with intermediate phosphorus concentrations. Yet, elephants revisited sites at intermediate distances from water and higher phosphorus concentrations more frequently. Moreover, phosphorus is the most important environmental variable influencing the revisitation rate. This study shows that analysing revisitation patterns gives valuable insight into how animals use specific sites within their home range, as the environmental covariates related to the selection of the revisitation sites differ from those related to the revisitation rate.

摘要

了解食草动物栖息地利用的空间模式对于理解生态过程和生态系统管理至关重要。过去的研究主要集中在解释食草动物的栖息地选择,以至于驱动栖息地选择的环境变量可被视为已得到充分研究。然而,尽管被重新访问的地点可能具有生态意义,但对于环境变量如何影响觅食地点再次访问的模式却知之甚少。南非大象数量的增加导致木本物种数量减少,因此有必要深入了解大象的栖息地利用情况,以改善对大象栖息地的管理。本研究旨在深入了解非洲象觅食地点再次访问的空间模式。为实现这一目标,评估了再次访问地点的空间位置在环境条件方面的非随机性。接下来,分析了这些环境变量与每个地点再次访问率之间的关系。最后,构建了一个模型来评估哪些环境变量对地点再次访问的影响最大。使用了南非大克鲁格地区大象十年的GPS跟踪数据。环境变量从现有数据源获取。使用基于AIC的模型选择,通过Kolmogorov检验和线性混合效应模型对数据进行分析。结果表明,大象选择靠近水源且坡度适中的再次访问地点。母象还选择磷浓度适中的再次访问地点。然而,大象更频繁地再次访问距离水源适中且磷浓度较高的地点。此外,磷是影响再次访问率的最重要环境变量。这项研究表明,分析再次访问模式能够深入了解动物如何在其活动范围内利用特定地点,因为与再次访问地点选择相关的环境协变量与与再次访问率相关的协变量不同。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45fd/12134087/3b81be4b05d6/ECE3-15-e71506-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45fd/12134087/beb5d1de005b/ECE3-15-e71506-g022.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45fd/12134087/67108bece359/ECE3-15-e71506-g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45fd/12134087/d371026c111d/ECE3-15-e71506-g021.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45fd/12134087/b988274a70ca/ECE3-15-e71506-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45fd/12134087/8cfb6f9f5624/ECE3-15-e71506-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45fd/12134087/f1fc28511cca/ECE3-15-e71506-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45fd/12134087/b2f81013138f/ECE3-15-e71506-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45fd/12134087/f0e68adb3997/ECE3-15-e71506-g026.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45fd/12134087/3b4f7d94e512/ECE3-15-e71506-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45fd/12134087/5ce2d179655a/ECE3-15-e71506-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45fd/12134087/3b396685feda/ECE3-15-e71506-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45fd/12134087/3b81be4b05d6/ECE3-15-e71506-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45fd/12134087/beb5d1de005b/ECE3-15-e71506-g022.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45fd/12134087/67108bece359/ECE3-15-e71506-g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45fd/12134087/d371026c111d/ECE3-15-e71506-g021.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45fd/12134087/b988274a70ca/ECE3-15-e71506-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45fd/12134087/8cfb6f9f5624/ECE3-15-e71506-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45fd/12134087/f1fc28511cca/ECE3-15-e71506-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45fd/12134087/b2f81013138f/ECE3-15-e71506-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45fd/12134087/f0e68adb3997/ECE3-15-e71506-g026.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45fd/12134087/3b4f7d94e512/ECE3-15-e71506-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45fd/12134087/5ce2d179655a/ECE3-15-e71506-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45fd/12134087/3b396685feda/ECE3-15-e71506-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45fd/12134087/3b81be4b05d6/ECE3-15-e71506-g011.jpg

相似文献

1
Environmental Determinants of Foraging Site Revisitation by African Elephants ().非洲象觅食地重访的环境决定因素()
Ecol Evol. 2025 Jun 3;15(6):e71506. doi: 10.1002/ece3.71506. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Social and Seasonal Factors Contribute to Shifts in Male African Elephant () Foraging and Activity Patterns in Kruger National Park, South Africa.社会和季节因素导致南非克鲁格国家公园雄性非洲象觅食和活动模式的变化。
Animals (Basel). 2021 Oct 27;11(11):3070. doi: 10.3390/ani11113070.
3
Human footprint and protected areas shape elephant range across Africa.人类足迹和保护区塑造了非洲各地的大象分布范围。
Curr Biol. 2021 Jun 7;31(11):2437-2445.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.03.042. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
4
DETECTION OF ELEPHANT ENDOTHELIOTROPIC HERPESVIRUS (EEHV) IN FREE-RANGING AFRICAN ELEPHANTS (LOXODONTA AFRICANA) IN THE KRUGER NATIONAL PARK, SOUTH AFRICA.在南非克鲁格国家公园的野生非洲象(非洲象属)中检测大象嗜内皮疱疹病毒(EEHV)
J Wildl Dis. 2023 Jan 1;59(1):128-137. doi: 10.7589/JWD-D-22-00015.
5
How do African elephants utilize the landscape during wet season? A habitat connectivity analysis for Sioma Ngwezi landscape in Zambia.非洲象在雨季如何利用这片土地?赞比亚索马恩格韦齐地区栖息地连通性分析。
Ecol Evol. 2021 Oct 7;11(21):14916-14931. doi: 10.1002/ece3.8177. eCollection 2021 Nov.
6
The consequences of poaching and anthropogenic change for forest elephants.偷猎及人为因素对非洲森林象的影响。
Conserv Biol. 2016 Oct;30(5):1019-26. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12679. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
7
Determinants of elephant foraging behaviour in a coupled human-natural system: Is brown the new green?在耦合的人类-自然系统中大象觅食行为的决定因素:棕色是新的绿色吗?
J Anim Ecol. 2019 May;88(5):780-792. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12971. Epub 2019 Mar 26.
8
Elevated elephant density does not improve ecotourism opportunities: convergence in social and ecological objectives.大象密度的提高并不能改善生态旅游机会:社会和生态目标趋同。
Ecol Appl. 2014 Jul;24(5):920-6. doi: 10.1890/13-0935.1.
9
Memory-Based Navigation in Elephants: Implications for Survival Strategies and Conservation.大象基于记忆的导航:对生存策略和保护的启示
Vet Sci. 2025 Mar 30;12(4):312. doi: 10.3390/vetsci12040312.
10
Water for African elephants (): faecal microbial loads affect use of artificial waterholes.非洲象的水源():粪便微生物负荷影响对人工水坑的使用。
Biol Lett. 2018 Aug;14(8). doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2018.0360.

本文引用的文献

1
Elevated temperatures shift flower head height distributions and seed dispersal patterns in two invasive thistle species.升高的温度改变了两种入侵蓟属植物的花头高度分布和种子扩散模式。
Ecology. 2024 Jan;105(1):e4201. doi: 10.1002/ecy.4201. Epub 2023 Nov 30.
2
Linking animal migration and ecosystem processes: Data-driven simulation of propagule dispersal by migratory herbivores.将动物迁徙与生态系统过程相联系:食草迁徙动物繁殖体扩散的数据驱动模拟
Ecol Evol. 2022 Oct 18;12(10):e9383. doi: 10.1002/ece3.9383. eCollection 2022 Oct.
3
African soil properties and nutrients mapped at 30 m spatial resolution using two-scale ensemble machine learning.
利用两尺度集成机器学习以 30 米空间分辨率绘制非洲土壤属性和养分图。
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 17;11(1):6130. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85639-y.
4
Patterns of foraging activity and fidelity in a southeast Asian flying fox.东南亚果蝠的觅食活动模式与忠诚度
Mov Ecol. 2020 Nov 10;8(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s40462-020-00232-8.
5
Spatial geochemistry influences the home range of elephants.空间地球化学影响大象的活动范围。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Aug 10;729:139066. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139066. Epub 2020 Apr 28.
6
Landscapes of Fear: Spatial Patterns of Risk Perception and Response.恐惧的风景:风险感知和反应的空间模式。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2019 Apr;34(4):355-368. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2019.01.004. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
7
African savanna elephants () as an example of a herbivore making movement choices based on nutritional needs.以非洲草原象( )为例,说明食草动物如何根据营养需求做出移动选择。 (括号内原文缺失具体内容)
PeerJ. 2019 Feb 1;7:e6260. doi: 10.7717/peerj.6260. eCollection 2019.
8
Spatial mapping shows that some African elephants use cognitive maps to navigate the core but not the periphery of their home ranges.空间测绘表明,一些非洲象利用认知地图在其活动范围的核心区域导航,但不在边缘区域。
Anim Cogn. 2019 Mar;22(2):251-263. doi: 10.1007/s10071-019-01242-9. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
9
The effect of grazing on the spatial heterogeneity of vegetation.放牧对植被空间异质性的影响。
Oecologia. 2001 Aug;128(4):465-479. doi: 10.1007/s004420100737. Epub 2001 Aug 1.
10
The many faces of fear: a synthesis of the methodological variation in characterizing predation risk.恐惧的多面性:捕食风险特征描述中方法学差异的综合分析
J Anim Ecol. 2017 Jul;86(4):749-765. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12680. Epub 2017 May 15.