Suppr超能文献

临床物理治疗中循证实践的现状

Current state of evidence-based practice in clinical physiotherapy.

作者信息

Roos Ronel

机构信息

Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.

出版信息

S Afr J Physiother. 2025 May 29;81(1):2139. doi: 10.4102/sajp.v81i1.2139. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Evidence-based practice (EBP) is a process that a clinician undertakes, implementing his or her clinical expertise while collaborating with the patient or client in the sociocultural context of care using the best available research evidence to inform practice. The approach has evolved over time in relation to its name, definition, scope and specific steps. In October 2001, member organisations of World Physiotherapy (then the World Confederation for Physical Therapy) gathered in London to discuss the status of EBP in the profession and to gain buy-in from regions to ensure that EBP would become a culture of practice in all regions. The purpose of this article is to describe the current state of EBP during physiotherapy as presented in the literature. Two decades have passed since this meeting, with noteworthy developments in clinical practice, education and research synthesis. Physiotherapists' opinions and attitudes towards EBP are favourable but do not always ensure good implementation and execution during clinical practice. Standardised outcome measures to evaluate the EBP of physiotherapists are available. Barriers remain, which are multifactorial, and facilitators such as time, support and education are integral to optimise implementation. The launch of the Physiotherapy Evidence Database is one strategy that facilitates EBP in physiotherapy.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

A culture of EBP exists upon reflection of published literature from different world regions. Consistent, quality implementation of EBP, including shared decision making with patients and evaluation of evidence implemented during clinical practice remain necessary.

摘要

未标注

循证实践(EBP)是临床医生所采用的一个过程,即在护理的社会文化背景下,与患者或客户合作时运用其临床专业知识,并使用可得的最佳研究证据为实践提供信息。随着时间的推移,这种方法在其名称、定义、范围和具体步骤方面不断演变。2001年10月,世界物理治疗组织(当时的世界物理治疗联合会)的成员组织齐聚伦敦,讨论循证实践在该行业的现状,并争取各地区的支持,以确保循证实践在所有地区成为一种实践文化。本文旨在描述文献中呈现的物理治疗中循证实践的当前状态。自这次会议以来已经过去了二十年,临床实践、教育和研究综合方面都有了显著进展。物理治疗师对循证实践的看法和态度是积极的,但在临床实践中并不总能确保良好的实施和执行。有用于评估物理治疗师循证实践的标准化结局指标。障碍仍然存在,这些障碍是多因素的,而时间、支持和教育等促进因素对于优化实施至关重要。物理治疗证据数据库的推出是促进物理治疗中循证实践的一项策略。

临床意义

通过对来自不同世界地区的已发表文献进行反思,可以发现循证实践文化的存在。循证实践的持续、高质量实施,包括与患者共同决策以及对临床实践中所实施证据的评估,仍然是必要的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cb2/12135705/397961879635/SAJP-81-2139-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验