Qian Shuang, Ugurlu Devran, Fairweather Elliot, Jones Richard E, Zaidi Hassan, Prasad Sanjay, Halliday Brian P, Hammersley Daniel J, Plank Gernot, Vigmond Edward, Rinaldi Christopher A, Young Alistair, Lamata Pablo, Bishop Martin, Niederer Steven
National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Alan Turing Institute, British Library, 96 Euston Rd, London, UK.
ArXiv. 2025 May 21:arXiv:2505.15708v1.
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) guidelines are based on clinical trials with limited female representation and inconsistent left bundle branch block (LBBB) definitions. Conventional QRS duration (QRSd) criteria show variable diagnostic accuracy between sexes, partly due to differences in heart size and remodeling. We evaluated the influence of sex, heart size, LBBB, and conduction delay on QRSd and assessed the diagnostic performance of conventional and indexed QRSd criteria using a population-based modelling approach. Simulated QRSd were derived from electrophysiological simulations conducted in 2627 UK Biobank healthy participants and 359 patients with ischemic heart disease, by modelling LBBB and normal activation combined with/without conduction delay. QRSd criteria under-selected LBBB females and over-selected non-LBBB patients. Indexing by LVEDV and LV mass reduced sex disparities but increased the over-selection in non-LBBB patients. Height-indexed QRSd effectively resolved sex differences and maintained low non-LBBB selection rates, demonstrating superior performance and potential for more equitable CRT selection.
心脏再同步治疗(CRT)指南是基于临床试验制定的,而这些试验中女性代表有限,且左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)的定义不一致。传统的QRS波时限(QRSd)标准在不同性别间显示出不同的诊断准确性,部分原因是心脏大小和重构存在差异。我们评估了性别、心脏大小、LBBB和传导延迟对QRSd的影响,并使用基于人群的建模方法评估了传统和指数化QRSd标准的诊断性能。通过对LBBB和正常激活状态进行建模,并结合/不结合传导延迟,从2627名英国生物银行健康参与者和359名缺血性心脏病患者的电生理模拟中得出模拟QRSd。QRSd标准对LBBB女性的选择不足,对非LBBB患者的选择过度。通过左心室舒张末期容积(LVEDV)和左心室质量进行指数化可减少性别差异,但会增加对非LBBB患者的过度选择。身高指数化的QRSd有效解决了性别差异问题,并保持了较低的非LBBB选择率,显示出卓越的性能以及在更公平的CRT选择方面的潜力。