Artificial intelligence vs human expertise: A comparison of plantar fascia thickness measurements through MRI imaging.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to evaluate the reliability of plantar fascia thickness measurements performed by ChatGPT-4 using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compared to those obtained by an experienced clinician.

METHODS

In this retrospective, single-center study, foot MRI images from the hospital archive were analysed. Plantar fascia thickness was measured under both blinded and non-blinded conditions by an experienced clinician and ChatGPT-4 at two separate time points. Measurement reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), mean absolute error (MAE), and mean relative error (MRE).

RESULTS

A total of 41 participants (32 females, 9 males) were included. The average plantar fascia thickness measured by the clinician was 4.20 ± 0.80 mm and 4.25 ± 0.92 mm under blinded and non-blinded conditions, respectively, while ChatGPT-4's measurements were 6.47 ± 1.30 mm and 6.46 ± 1.31 mm, respectively. Human evaluators demonstrated excellent agreement (ICC = 0.983-0.989), whereas ChatGPT-4 exhibited low reliability (ICC = 0.391-0.432). In thin plantar fascia cases, ChatGPT-4's error rate was higher, with MAE = 2.70 mm, MRE = 77.17 % under blinded conditions, and MAE = 2.91 mm, MRE = 87.02 % under non-blinded conditions.

CONCLUSION

ChatGPT-4 demonstrated lower reliability in plantar fascia thickness measurements compared to an experienced clinician, with increased error rates in thin structures. These findings highlight the limitations of AI-based models in medical image analysis and emphasize the need for further refinement before clinical implementation.