Jenkinson Mark R J, Cheung Calvin, Dick Alastair G, Witt Johan, Hutt Jonathan
Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
University College London, London, UK.
Bone Jt Open. 2025 Jun 6;6(6):651-657. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.66.BJO-2024-0265.R1.
Hip preservation surgeons are increasingly using commercially available 3D motion analysis software to investigate areas of impingement and quantify femoral head coverage. Variations in functional pelvic tilt will affect the position of the acetabular rim and projected femoral head coverage, but currently the majority of available software standardizes sagittal rotation to the anterior pelvic plane (APP). The study hypothesis was that the APP does not correlate well with patient-specific pelvic position.
In total, 60 patients were selected from an institutional database: 20 with acetabular retroversion (AR), 20 with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), and 20 with cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Multiplanar CT reformats were created and the sagittal rotation was aligned to the APP. The sagittal pelvic orientation was then corrected until the anteroposterior (AP) projection mirrored that of their preoperative supine and standing plain radiographs. The change in sagittal pelvic tilt angle required was measured.
The mean deviation from the APP in the AR group was 11.55° (SD 4.96°) for supine radiographs and 3.28° (SD 8.66°) for standing radiographs. The mean deviation from the APP in the DDH group was 12.2° (SD 4.26°) for supine radiographs and 6.96° (SD 3.43°) for standing radiographs. The main deviation from the APP in the FAI group was 8.63° (SD 5.21°) for supine radiographs and -1.28° (SD 7.31°) for standing.
There is a wide variation in patients' functional pelvic positioning in both supine and standing radiographs, in all different subgroups, which rarely correlates with the APP. Commercial 3D motion analysis may therefore give misleading results for both the extent and location of hip impingement as well as femoral head coverage, which may affect surgical decision-making. Consideration should be given to incorporating this into the software algorithms.
髋关节保留手术医生越来越多地使用市售的三维运动分析软件来研究撞击区域并量化股骨头覆盖情况。功能性骨盆倾斜的变化会影响髋臼边缘的位置和预计的股骨头覆盖情况,但目前大多数可用软件将矢状面旋转标准化为骨盆前平面(APP)。本研究假设是APP与患者特定的骨盆位置相关性不佳。
从机构数据库中总共选取60例患者:20例髋臼后倾(AR)患者、20例发育性髋关节发育不良(DDH)患者和20例凸轮型股骨髋臼撞击症(FAI)患者。创建多平面CT重建图像,并将矢状面旋转与APP对齐。然后校正矢状骨盆方向,直到前后位(AP)投影与术前仰卧位和站立位平片的投影一致。测量所需的矢状骨盆倾斜角度变化。
AR组仰卧位X线片与APP的平均偏差为11.55°(标准差4.96°),站立位X线片为3.28°(标准差8.66°)。DDH组仰卧位X线片与APP的平均偏差为12.2°(标准差4.26°),站立位X线片为6.96°(标准差3.43°)。FAI组仰卧位X线片与APP的主要偏差为8.63°(标准差5.21°),站立位为-1.28°(标准差7.31°)。
在所有不同亚组中,仰卧位和站立位X线片中患者的功能性骨盆定位存在很大差异,很少与APP相关。因此,商业三维运动分析对于髋关节撞击的范围和位置以及股骨头覆盖情况可能会给出误导性结果,这可能会影响手术决策。应考虑将此纳入软件算法中。