Feng Qi, Wu Xin, Liu Qianwen, Xiao Yuanyuan, Zhang Xixing, Chen Yan
Changsha Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, No. 509, Wanjiali Second North Road, Kaifu District, Changsha, 410001, Hunan, China.
Sci Rep. 2025 Jun 5;15(1):19811. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-05021-0.
This study assessed the efficacy of various diagnostic indicators and machine learning (ML) models in predicting childhood myopia. A total of 2,365 children aged 5-12 years were included in the study. The participants were exposed to non-cycloplegic and cycloplegic refraction tests, along with ocular biometric assessments. Cycloplegia was induced using 1% cyclopentolate eye drops, followed by cycloplegic refraction testing. Myopia prevalence was 11.2% (95% confidence interval: 9.9-12.5%). The spherical equivalent (SE) before and after cycloplegia varied with age, significantly differing by 0.5D in children < 10 years (P < 0.05). The most effective single-indicator screening diagnostic methods were axial length/ corneal curvature radius (AL/CCR) and screening myopia, with area under curve (AUC) of 0.919 (95% CI: 0.899 to 0.939) and 0.911 (95% CI: 0.890 to 0.932). In the multi-indicator joint diagnostic model, the best diagnostic model using non-cycloplegic SE, uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCDVA), AL, and age was the Extreme Gradient Boosting model, with an AUC of 0.983 and an accuracy of 0.970. The best diagnostic model using non-cycloplegic SE, AL/CCR, UCDVA, and age was the Random Forest model, with an AUC of 0.981 and an accuracy of 0.975. The AL/CCR demonstrated superior performance in predicting childhood myopia. The ML-based multi-indicator joint diagnostic predictive model enhances the accuracy of childhood myopia diagnosis, screening, and intervention.
本研究评估了各种诊断指标和机器学习(ML)模型在预测儿童近视方面的有效性。共有2365名5至12岁的儿童纳入本研究。参与者接受了非散瞳和散瞳验光测试以及眼部生物测量评估。使用1%环喷托酯滴眼液进行散瞳,随后进行散瞳验光测试。近视患病率为11.2%(95%置信区间:9.9 - 12.5%)。散瞳前后的等效球镜度(SE)随年龄变化,10岁以下儿童差异显著,相差0.5D(P < 0.05)。最有效的单指标筛查诊断方法是眼轴长度/角膜曲率半径(AL/CCR)和筛查性近视,曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.919(95%CI:0.899至0.939)和0.911(95%CI:0.890至0.932)。在多指标联合诊断模型中,使用非散瞳SE、未矫正远视力(UCDVA)、AL和年龄的最佳诊断模型是极端梯度提升模型,AUC为0.983,准确率为0.970。使用非散瞳SE、AL/CCR、UCDVA和年龄的最佳诊断模型是随机森林模型,AUC为0.981,准确率为0.975。AL/CCR在预测儿童近视方面表现出卓越性能。基于ML的多指标联合诊断预测模型提高了儿童近视诊断、筛查和干预的准确性。