Suppr超能文献

在美国对曾接受输精管切除术的人群进行的调查中,对 “男性避孕” 新方法的关注情况。

Interest in new methods of "male contraception" in survey of people with a prior vasectomy in the United States.

作者信息

Mahoney Madeline, Hassan Asha, Ojanen-Goldsmith Alison, Boraas Christy

机构信息

Research Division, Planned Parenthood North Central States, Minneapolis, USA.

Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities, 420 Delaware St. SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.

出版信息

Contracept Reprod Med. 2025 Jun 5;10(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s40834-025-00369-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Alternative contraceptive methods for sperm, often referred to as "male contraception" are in development. Given the lack of current contraceptive options for people who produce sperm, we sought to understand if people with vasectomies would have preferred an alternative contraceptive method, had one been available.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional online survey with 195 participants. Participants were recruited via an email list of 658 people who had received vasectomies from Planned Parenthood North Central States (PPNCS) since 2013 and were willing to be contacted for research purposes.

RESULTS

26.7% of participants reported that access to a different method of birth control for sperm that was highly effective, non-surgical, and fully reversible would have likely or very likely changed their decision to have a vasectomy (44.6% reported it was unlikely or very unlikely and 28.7% were neutral). Reasons for preferring alternative contraceptive methods included reversibility, the desire to avoid surgery, and the accessibility of alternative methods. Demographic findings include that 46.2% of people surveyed had no children at the time of their vasectomy and only 41% of participants were married at the time of their vasectomy. Previous literature has suggested most people undergoing vasectomies are married with children. Two main motivating factors in participants' decision to have a vasectomy were wanting to prevent future biological children and the preference of participants or their partners for vasectomy over other contraceptive methods.

CONCLUSIONS

Alternative contraceptive methods for sperm would likely or very likely be preferred by a significant proportion of people who have undergone a vasectomy.

摘要

背景

针对精子的替代避孕方法,通常被称为“男性避孕”,正在研发中。鉴于目前缺乏针对产生精子者的避孕选择,我们试图了解,如果有替代避孕方法,接受输精管切除术的人是否会更倾向于使用它。

方法

我们对195名参与者进行了一项横断面在线调查。参与者是通过一个包含658人的电子邮件列表招募的,这些人自2013年以来在计划生育中北部各州(PPNCS)接受了输精管切除术,并且愿意为研究目的被联系。

结果

26.7%的参与者报告说,如果有一种高效、非手术且完全可逆的精子避孕方法,很可能或非常可能会改变他们进行输精管切除术的决定(44.6%的人报告说不太可能或非常不可能,28.7%的人持中立态度)。倾向于替代避孕方法的原因包括可逆性、避免手术的愿望以及替代方法的可及性。人口统计学调查结果显示,46.2%的被调查者在进行输精管切除术时没有孩子,只有41%的参与者在进行输精管切除术时已婚。以往的文献表明,大多数接受输精管切除术的人是已婚并有孩子的。参与者决定进行输精管切除术的两个主要动机因素是想要防止未来生育亲生孩子,以及参与者或其伴侣对输精管切除术相对于其他避孕方法的偏好。

结论

很大一部分接受输精管切除术的人可能或非常可能更倾向于替代精子避孕方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f847/12142879/3562d07a4c1e/40834_2025_369_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验