Saif-Ur-Rahman K M, Movsisyan Ani, Kothari Kavita, Conway Thomas, Tierney Marie, Madden Caoimhe, Taneri Petek Eylul, O'Halloran Jane A, Nurdin Nadra, Murphy Lena, Mulholland Deirdre, Tricco Andrea C, Devane Declan
Evidence Synthesis Ireland and Cochrane Ireland University of Galway Galway Ireland.
School of Nursing and Midwifery University of Galway Galway Ireland.
Cochrane Evid Synth Methods. 2023 Nov 21;1(9):e12030. doi: 10.1002/cesm.12030. eCollection 2023 Nov.
Rapid identification of severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections by testing potentially reduced coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) cases. Testing strategies varied across countries and during different stages of the pandemic. This scoping review aims to map the available evidence on the effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2 testing strategies for suspected cases and asymptomatic populations to inform the development of World Health Organization recommendations for SARS-CoV-2 testing strategies.
We followed the standard methods for scoping reviews. We searched Medline (OVID), EMBASE (Elsevier), and Europe PMC using a comprehensive search strategy. The search was conducted in January 2023 and covered the period from January 2020 to January 2023. Two review authors independently screened the titles and abstracts, and full texts. Data were extracted onto a pilot-tested form by a review author and cross-checked by another review author. We provided a descriptive report summarizing the extracted data around the outcomes and created an interactive map of the available evidence using the evidence for policy and practice mapper.
We identified 34,550 citations from the databases. After the screening, we included 17 studies from 11 countries for data extraction. The study designs were randomized controlled trials ( = 3), nonrandomized experimental studies ( = 3), cohort studies ( = 3), cross-sectional studies ( = 4), self-controlled case series ( = 1), and economic evaluations ( = 3). Among the included studies, 14 used reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and 10 studies used antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic test. The settings of the studies were healthcare facilities ( = 8), communities ( = 4), schools, and workplaces ( = 3). Included studies considered symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals, or both, or asymptomatic contacts. Most of the studies ( = 14) reported the COVID-19 positivity rate as the primary outcome. Other reported outcomes are the number of COVID-19 cases ( = 11), number of hospitalizations and deaths ( = 3), and cost ( = 3).
We identified evidence gaps in the effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2 testing strategies, particularly in specific settings such as schools and long-term care facilities. This scoping review provides a foundation for further research, allowing researchers and stakeholders to focus on addressing the identified gaps.
通过检测快速识别严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)感染可能会减少冠状病毒病19(COVID-19)病例。不同国家以及疫情不同阶段的检测策略各不相同。本综述旨在梳理关于SARS-CoV-2检测策略对疑似病例和无症状人群有效性的现有证据,为世界卫生组织制定SARS-CoV-2检测策略建议提供参考。
我们遵循综述的标准方法。使用全面的检索策略在Medline(OVID)、EMBASE(爱思唯尔)和欧洲PMC数据库中进行检索。检索于2023年1月进行,涵盖2020年1月至2023年1月期间。两位综述作者独立筛选标题、摘要和全文。一位综述作者将数据提取到预先测试过的表格上,另一位综述作者进行交叉核对。我们提供了一份描述性报告,总结围绕结果提取的数据,并使用政策与实践证据映射器创建了现有证据的交互式地图。
我们从数据库中识别出34,550条引文。筛选后,我们纳入了来自11个国家的17项研究进行数据提取。研究设计包括随机对照试验(=3)、非随机实验研究(=3)、队列研究(=3)、横断面研究(=4)、自身对照病例系列(=1)和经济评估(=3)。在所纳入的研究中,14项使用逆转录聚合酶链反应,10项使用抗原检测快速诊断试验。研究场所包括医疗机构(=8)、社区(=4)、学校和工作场所(=3)。纳入的研究考虑了有症状和无症状个体,或两者兼有,或无症状接触者。大多数研究(=14)将COVID-19阳性率作为主要结果。其他报告的结果包括COVID-19病例数(=11)、住院和死亡人数(=3)以及成本(=3)。
我们发现SARS-CoV-2检测策略有效性方面存在证据空白,尤其是在学校和长期护理机构等特定场所。本综述为进一步研究奠定了基础,使研究人员和利益相关者能够专注于填补已识别的空白。