文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

澳大利亚高危慢性阻塞性肺疾病管理中的护理模式(2015 - 2019年):一项针对征服质量改进项目的观察性研究

Patterns of care in the management of high-risk COPD in Australia (2015-2019): an observational study for the CONQUEST quality improvement program.

作者信息

Jenkins Christine, Dickens Andrew P, Evans Alexander, Le Cheng Porsche, Heraud Florian, Hancock Kerry, Sharma Anita, Cochrane Belinda, Roussos Alexander, Le Lievre Chantal, Blakey John, Bosnic-Anticevich Sinthia, Carter Victoria, Catanzariti Angelina, Ghisla Clare, Hew Mark, Ko Brian, Le Thao, Leong Paul, McDonald Vanessa M, Lau Chi Ming, Perret Jennifer L, Pullen Rachel, Ranasinghe Kanchanamala, Soriano Joan B, Stewart Deb, van Melle Marije, Wiseman Russell, Price David

机构信息

Head Respiratory Group, The George Institute and, UNSW, Sydney, Australia.

Optimum Patient Care Australia, QLD, Australia.

出版信息

Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2025 May 6;58:101555. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2025.101555. eCollection 2025 May.


DOI:10.1016/j.lanwpc.2025.101555
PMID:40475885
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12138569/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: We compared the management of patients with 'high-risk' COPD in Australia to national/international guidelines and quality standards, including the COllaboratioN on QUality improvement initiative for achieving Excellence in STandards of COPD care (CONQUEST). METHODS: Eligible patients in the Optimum Patient Care Research Database Australia were categorized as newly diagnosed (≤12 months after diagnosis), already diagnosed, or patients with potential undiagnosed COPD, in each year from 2015 to 2019. 'High-risk' patients had ≥2 COPD exacerbations/exacerbation-like events in the last 24 months. Descriptive statistics for 2019 are reported, along with annual trends. FINDINGS: In 2019, 11.3% (2608/22,985) of eligible patients met high-risk criteria. Most newly diagnosed high-risk COPD patients (71.3%) had no recorded lung function testing within 12 months of diagnosis. 63.6% of new COPD diagnoses had no evidence of supporting spirometry or chest CT, with the remainder having recorded chest CT only. 44.3% of already diagnosed high-risk patients had no recorded inhaled maintenance therapy, although this was recorded for 11.2% of potential undiagnosed patients. Smoking cessation support and pulmonary rehabilitation were recorded for <40% and ≤2% of diagnosed COPD patients respectively. INTERPRETATION: There is substantial opportunity to improve diagnosis, assessment and treatment of patients with COPD in Australia by identifying, reviewing and managing high-risk patients in accordance with evidence-based guidelines and CONQUEST standards. FUNDING: This study was conducted by Optimum Patient Care Australia Pty Ltd (OPCA) and was partially funded by OPCA and AstraZeneca Pty Ltd. No funding was received by the Observational & Pragmatic Research Institute Pte Ltd (OPRI) for its contribution.

摘要

背景:我们将澳大利亚“高危”慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的管理情况与国家/国际指南及质量标准进行了比较,其中包括旨在实现COPD护理标准卓越性的质量改进合作倡议(CONQUEST)。 方法:2015年至2019年期间,澳大利亚最佳患者护理研究数据库中的符合条件的患者每年被分类为新诊断(诊断后≤12个月)、已诊断或可能未诊断的COPD患者。“高危”患者在过去24个月内有≥2次COPD加重/类似加重事件。报告了2019年的描述性统计数据以及年度趋势。 结果:2019年,11.3%(2608/22985)的符合条件的患者符合高危标准。大多数新诊断的高危COPD患者(71.3%)在诊断后12个月内没有进行肺功能测试记录。63.6%的新COPD诊断没有支持性肺量计或胸部CT的证据,其余仅记录了胸部CT。44.3%的已诊断高危患者没有吸入维持治疗的记录,尽管11.2%的可能未诊断患者有此记录。分别有<40%和≤2%的已诊断COPD患者记录了戒烟支持和肺康复。 解读:通过按照循证指南和CONQUEST标准识别、审查和管理高危患者,澳大利亚在改善COPD患者的诊断、评估和治疗方面有很大机会。 资金:本研究由澳大利亚最佳患者护理私人有限公司(OPCA)进行,部分由OPCA和阿斯利康私人有限公司资助。观察与实用研究所有限公司(OPRI)未因其贡献获得资金。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90f4/12138569/386f5079397c/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90f4/12138569/8bba646f3c3c/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90f4/12138569/7003ffa6614f/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90f4/12138569/4e3896228249/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90f4/12138569/386f5079397c/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90f4/12138569/8bba646f3c3c/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90f4/12138569/7003ffa6614f/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90f4/12138569/4e3896228249/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90f4/12138569/386f5079397c/gr4.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Patterns of care in the management of high-risk COPD in Australia (2015-2019): an observational study for the CONQUEST quality improvement program.

Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2025-5-6

[2]
Patterns of care in the management of high-risk COPD in the US (2011-2019): an observational study for the CONQUEST quality improvement program.

Lancet Reg Health Am. 2023-7-28

[3]
Identification of key opportunities for optimising the management of high-risk COPD patients in the UK using the CONQUEST quality standards: an observational longitudinal study.

Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2023-4-21

[4]
Pragmatic Evaluation of an Improvement Program for People Living With Modifiable High-Risk COPD Versus Usual Care: Protocols for the Cluster Randomized PREVAIL Trial.

Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2025-5-27

[5]
CONQUEST Quality Standards: For the Collaboration on Quality Improvement Initiative for Achieving Excellence in Standards of COPD Care.

Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2021

[6]
Health Care Resource Utilization and Exacerbation Rates in Patients with COPD Stratified by Disease Severity in a Commercially Insured Population.

J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019-2

[7]
Guideline for the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease--2011 update.

S Afr Med J. 2011-1

[8]
Guideline for the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): 2004 revision.

S Afr Med J. 2004-7

[9]
[Standard technical specifications for methacholine chloride (Methacholine) bronchial challenge test (2023)].

Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2024-2-12

[10]
Educational interventions for health professionals managing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in primary care.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-5-6

引用本文的文献

[1]
Pragmatic Evaluation of an Improvement Program for People Living With Modifiable High-Risk COPD Versus Usual Care: Protocols for the Cluster Randomized PREVAIL Trial.

Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2025-5-27

本文引用的文献

[1]
Mapping the Common Barriers to Optimal COPD Care in High and Middle-Income Countries: Qualitative Perspectives from Clinicians.

Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2024

[2]
Cardiovascular disease and risk in COPD: a state of the art review.

Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2024

[3]
The Association Between Short-Acting β-Agonist Over-Prescription, and Patient-Reported Acquisition and Use on Asthma Control and Exacerbations: Data from Australia.

Adv Ther. 2024-3

[4]
Heightened long-term cardiovascular risks after exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Heart. 2024-4-25

[5]
Temporal Risk of Nonfatal Cardiovascular Events After Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbation: A Population-based Study.

Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024-4-15

[6]
Barriers to spirometry in Australian general practice: A systematic review.

Aust J Gen Pract. 2023-9

[7]
Patterns of care in the management of high-risk COPD in the US (2011-2019): an observational study for the CONQUEST quality improvement program.

Lancet Reg Health Am. 2023-7-28

[8]
The global economic burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease for 204 countries and territories in 2020-50: a health-augmented macroeconomic modelling study.

Lancet Glob Health. 2023-8

[9]
Cause-specific mortality in COPD subpopulations: a cohort study of 339 647 people in England.

Thorax. 2024-2-15

[10]
Identification of key opportunities for optimising the management of high-risk COPD patients in the UK using the CONQUEST quality standards: an observational longitudinal study.

Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2023-4-21

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索