• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

巴西医疗保健领域对暴力和虐待行为的应对:一项准实验性的差分分析。

Healthcare responding to violence and abuse in Brazil: a quasi-experimental difference-in-differences analysis.

作者信息

Barbosa Estela Capelas, Pereira Stephanie, Bacchus Loraine J, Colombini Manuela, Feder Gene, Schraiber Lilia Blima, Pires Lucas d'Oliveira Ana Flávia

机构信息

Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.

Department of Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, Av. Dr. Arnaldo, 455 Cerqueira César, São Paulo, 01246-903, Brazil.

出版信息

Lancet Reg Health Am. 2025 May 8;47:101114. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2025.101114. eCollection 2025 Jul.

DOI:10.1016/j.lana.2025.101114
PMID:40476048
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12135433/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Domestic violence against women (DVAW) is a public health issue and a breach of human rights, yet evidence on effective interventions remains limited, particularly in low-income and middle-income countries. This study aimed to evaluate changes in identification and referral to specialist support associated with system-level strategies implemented within Brazilian primary healthcare (PHC) to strengthen the response to DVAW. The strategies comprised an intervention called Healthcare Responding to Violence and Abuse (HERA).

METHODS

Using a quasi-experimental design, HERA was implemented in eight PHC clinics, while 33 served as controls. Data on DVAW identification and referral were obtained from the national Epidemiological Surveillance System. Difference-in-differences analysis, using negative binomial regression, assessed HERA's impact, controlling for patient inflow, clinical supervision, COVID-19 lockdown, region, and clinic. Results are reported as marginal effects with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

FINDINGS

There was an increase in the probability of DVAW identification (0.47; 95% CI 0.18-0.77) and referral to support services (0.38; 95% CI 0.03-0.73), when adjusting for panel effects and time. The results were even larger when further controlling for additional variables (0.82 for identification [95% CI 0.44-1.21] and 0.87 for referrals [95% CI 0.47-1.29]).

INTERPRETATION

HERA strategies increased DVAW identification and referral in PHC settings. Clinics implementing HERA were already more likely to identify and refer cases before the implementation, suggesting that HERA's strategies may be more effective in clinics that find DVAW interventions more acceptable, at least in Brazil.

FUNDING

NIHR Global Health Research Group Award.

摘要

背景

针对妇女的家庭暴力(DVAW)是一个公共卫生问题,也是对人权的侵犯,但关于有效干预措施的证据仍然有限,尤其是在低收入和中等收入国家。本研究旨在评估与巴西初级卫生保健(PHC)中实施的系统层面策略相关的对DVAW识别及转介至专科支持的变化,以加强对DVAW的应对。这些策略包括一项名为“医疗应对暴力与虐待(HERA)”的干预措施。

方法

采用准实验设计,在8家初级卫生保健诊所实施HERA,33家作为对照。关于DVAW识别和转介的数据来自国家流行病学监测系统。使用负二项回归的差异分析评估HERA的影响,同时控制患者流入、临床监督、新冠疫情封锁、地区和诊所等因素。结果以边际效应及95%置信区间(CI)报告。

研究结果

在调整面板效应和时间后,DVAW识别概率增加(0.47;95% CI 0.18 - 0.77),转介至支持服务的概率增加(0.38;95% CI 0.03 - 0.73)。在进一步控制其他变量后,结果更大(识别为0.82 [95% CI 0.44 - 1.21],转介为0.87 [95% CI 0.47 - 1.29])。

解读

HERA策略增加了初级卫生保健环境中对DVAW的识别和转介。实施HERA的诊所在实施前就更有可能识别和转介病例,这表明HERA策略可能在那些认为DVAW干预措施更容易接受的诊所中更有效,至少在巴西是这样。

资金来源

英国国家卫生研究院全球健康研究小组奖。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0d5/12135433/0c5339d44517/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0d5/12135433/cc5c21c0f3a1/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0d5/12135433/a7c2d17c22bd/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0d5/12135433/0c5339d44517/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0d5/12135433/cc5c21c0f3a1/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0d5/12135433/a7c2d17c22bd/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0d5/12135433/0c5339d44517/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
Healthcare responding to violence and abuse in Brazil: a quasi-experimental difference-in-differences analysis.巴西医疗保健领域对暴力和虐待行为的应对:一项准实验性的差分分析。
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2025 May 8;47:101114. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2025.101114. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
An evidence-based primary health care intervention to address domestic violence against women in Brazil: a mixed method evaluation.循证初级卫生保健干预措施在巴西解决针对妇女的家庭暴力问题:混合方法评价。
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Sep 25;24(1):198. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02150-1.
3
Evaluation of a domestic violence training and support intervention in Palestinian primary care clinics in the west bank: a mixed method study.约旦河西岸巴勒斯坦初级保健诊所家庭暴力培训与支持干预措施的评估:一项混合方法研究
BMC Prim Care. 2025 Apr 4;26(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02751-y.
4
Adaptive work in the primary health care response to domestic violence in occupied Palestinian territory: a qualitative evaluation using Extended Normalisation Process Theory.适应巴勒斯坦被占领土初级卫生保健应对家庭暴力的工作:运用扩展的常态过程理论进行定性评估。
BMC Fam Pract. 2021 Jan 2;22(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01338-z.
5
Screening women for intimate partner violence in healthcare settings.在医疗保健机构中对女性进行亲密伴侣暴力筛查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 22;2015(7):CD007007. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007007.pub3.
6
A multi-country mixed method evaluation of the HERA (Healthcare Responding to Domestic Violence and Abuse) intervention: A comparative analysis.HERA(应对家庭暴力与虐待的医疗保健)干预措施的多国混合方法评估:一项比较分析。
SSM Health Syst. 2025 Jun;4:100042. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmhs.2024.100042.
7
[Life-long domestic violence against women: prevalence and immediate impact on health, work, and family].[针对妇女的终身家庭暴力:患病率及其对健康、工作和家庭的直接影响]
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2010 Apr;27(4):300-8. doi: 10.1590/s1020-49892010000400009.
8
What Are the Saudi Community Attitudes Towards Domestic Violence Against Women? A Cross-Sectional Study From Riyadh.沙特社区对女性家庭暴力的态度如何?利雅得的一项横断面研究。
J Transcult Nurs. 2022 Jul;33(4):475-483. doi: 10.1177/10436596211057896. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
9
Effects of second responder programs on repeat incidents of family abuse: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.二次响应者计划对家庭虐待重复事件的影响:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 28;18(1):e1217. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1217. eCollection 2022 Mar.
10
Acceptability of domestic violence against women in the European Union: a multilevel analysis.欧盟对针对妇女的家庭暴力的接受度:一项多层次分析。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006 Feb;60(2):123-9. doi: 10.1136/jech.2005.036533.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of an intervention to improve Primary Health Care's response to cases of domestic violence against women - São Paulo, Brazil.评估一项干预措施,以改善初级卫生保健对针对妇女的家庭暴力案件的反应 - 巴西圣保罗。
Cien Saude Colet. 2024 Sep;29(9):e02982024. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232024299.02982024. Epub 2024 May 10.
2
Comparing health systems readiness for integrating domestic violence services in Brazil, occupied Palestinian Territories, Nepal and Sri Lanka.比较巴西、巴勒斯坦被占领土、尼泊尔和斯里兰卡在整合家庭暴力服务方面的卫生系统准备情况。
Health Policy Plan. 2024 Jun 3;39(6):552-563. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czae032.
3
What Interventions are Cost Effective in Reducing Violence Against Women? A Scoping Review.
哪些干预措施能有效减少针对妇女的暴力行为? 范围综述。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2024 May;22(3):283-296. doi: 10.1007/s40258-023-00870-0. Epub 2024 Jan 27.
4
An evidence-based primary health care intervention to address domestic violence against women in Brazil: a mixed method evaluation.循证初级卫生保健干预措施在巴西解决针对妇女的家庭暴力问题:混合方法评价。
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Sep 25;24(1):198. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02150-1.
5
General practice wide adaptations to support patients affected by DVA during the COVID-19 pandemic: a rapid qualitative study.全科医学广泛适应措施以支持在 COVID-19 大流行期间受 DV A 影响的患者:一项快速定性研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Mar 23;24(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02008-6.
6
Interventions in sexual and reproductive health services addressing violence against women in low-income and middle-income countries: a mixed-methods systematic review.干预措施在性健康和生殖健康服务中解决中低收入国家的妇女遭受暴力问题:一项混合方法系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 22;12(2):e051924. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051924.
7
Global, regional, and national prevalence estimates of physical or sexual, or both, intimate partner violence against women in 2018.2018 年全球、区域和国家对女性身体或性或两者兼具的亲密伴侣暴力的流行率估计。
Lancet. 2022 Feb 26;399(10327):803-813. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02664-7. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
8
Are We Asking Too Much of the Health Sector? Exploring the Readiness of Brazilian Primary Healthcare to Respond to Domestic Violence Against Women.我们是否对卫生部门要求过高?探讨巴西初级卫生保健对回应针对妇女的家庭暴力的准备情况。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Jul 1;11(7):961-972. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.237. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
9
Randomized  Controlled Trials Versus Real-World Data in the COVID-19 Era: A False Narrative.新冠疫情时代的随机对照试验与真实世界数据:一种错误的说法。
Cancer Invest. 2020 Nov;38(10):537-542. doi: 10.1080/07357907.2020.1841922. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
10
[Health administrators and public policies to deal with gender violence against women in São Paulo, Brazil].[巴西圣保罗应对针对妇女的性别暴力的卫生管理人员与公共政策]
Cad Saude Publica. 2018 Aug 20;34(8):e00140017. doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00140017.