Suppr超能文献

巴西医疗保健领域对暴力和虐待行为的应对:一项准实验性的差分分析。

Healthcare responding to violence and abuse in Brazil: a quasi-experimental difference-in-differences analysis.

作者信息

Barbosa Estela Capelas, Pereira Stephanie, Bacchus Loraine J, Colombini Manuela, Feder Gene, Schraiber Lilia Blima, Pires Lucas d'Oliveira Ana Flávia

机构信息

Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.

Department of Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, Av. Dr. Arnaldo, 455 Cerqueira César, São Paulo, 01246-903, Brazil.

出版信息

Lancet Reg Health Am. 2025 May 8;47:101114. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2025.101114. eCollection 2025 Jul.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Domestic violence against women (DVAW) is a public health issue and a breach of human rights, yet evidence on effective interventions remains limited, particularly in low-income and middle-income countries. This study aimed to evaluate changes in identification and referral to specialist support associated with system-level strategies implemented within Brazilian primary healthcare (PHC) to strengthen the response to DVAW. The strategies comprised an intervention called Healthcare Responding to Violence and Abuse (HERA).

METHODS

Using a quasi-experimental design, HERA was implemented in eight PHC clinics, while 33 served as controls. Data on DVAW identification and referral were obtained from the national Epidemiological Surveillance System. Difference-in-differences analysis, using negative binomial regression, assessed HERA's impact, controlling for patient inflow, clinical supervision, COVID-19 lockdown, region, and clinic. Results are reported as marginal effects with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

FINDINGS

There was an increase in the probability of DVAW identification (0.47; 95% CI 0.18-0.77) and referral to support services (0.38; 95% CI 0.03-0.73), when adjusting for panel effects and time. The results were even larger when further controlling for additional variables (0.82 for identification [95% CI 0.44-1.21] and 0.87 for referrals [95% CI 0.47-1.29]).

INTERPRETATION

HERA strategies increased DVAW identification and referral in PHC settings. Clinics implementing HERA were already more likely to identify and refer cases before the implementation, suggesting that HERA's strategies may be more effective in clinics that find DVAW interventions more acceptable, at least in Brazil.

FUNDING

NIHR Global Health Research Group Award.

摘要

背景

针对妇女的家庭暴力(DVAW)是一个公共卫生问题,也是对人权的侵犯,但关于有效干预措施的证据仍然有限,尤其是在低收入和中等收入国家。本研究旨在评估与巴西初级卫生保健(PHC)中实施的系统层面策略相关的对DVAW识别及转介至专科支持的变化,以加强对DVAW的应对。这些策略包括一项名为“医疗应对暴力与虐待(HERA)”的干预措施。

方法

采用准实验设计,在8家初级卫生保健诊所实施HERA,33家作为对照。关于DVAW识别和转介的数据来自国家流行病学监测系统。使用负二项回归的差异分析评估HERA的影响,同时控制患者流入、临床监督、新冠疫情封锁、地区和诊所等因素。结果以边际效应及95%置信区间(CI)报告。

研究结果

在调整面板效应和时间后,DVAW识别概率增加(0.47;95% CI 0.18 - 0.77),转介至支持服务的概率增加(0.38;95% CI 0.03 - 0.73)。在进一步控制其他变量后,结果更大(识别为0.82 [95% CI 0.44 - 1.21],转介为0.87 [95% CI 0.47 - 1.29])。

解读

HERA策略增加了初级卫生保健环境中对DVAW的识别和转介。实施HERA的诊所在实施前就更有可能识别和转介病例,这表明HERA策略可能在那些认为DVAW干预措施更容易接受的诊所中更有效,至少在巴西是这样。

资金来源

英国国家卫生研究院全球健康研究小组奖。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0d5/12135433/cc5c21c0f3a1/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Healthcare responding to violence and abuse in Brazil: a quasi-experimental difference-in-differences analysis.
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2025 May 8;47:101114. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2025.101114. eCollection 2025 Jul.
5
Screening women for intimate partner violence in healthcare settings.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 22;2015(7):CD007007. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007007.pub3.
7
[Life-long domestic violence against women: prevalence and immediate impact on health, work, and family].
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2010 Apr;27(4):300-8. doi: 10.1590/s1020-49892010000400009.
8
What Are the Saudi Community Attitudes Towards Domestic Violence Against Women? A Cross-Sectional Study From Riyadh.
J Transcult Nurs. 2022 Jul;33(4):475-483. doi: 10.1177/10436596211057896. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
9
Effects of second responder programs on repeat incidents of family abuse: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
Campbell Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 28;18(1):e1217. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1217. eCollection 2022 Mar.
10
Acceptability of domestic violence against women in the European Union: a multilevel analysis.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006 Feb;60(2):123-9. doi: 10.1136/jech.2005.036533.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of an intervention to improve Primary Health Care's response to cases of domestic violence against women - São Paulo, Brazil.
Cien Saude Colet. 2024 Sep;29(9):e02982024. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232024299.02982024. Epub 2024 May 10.
3
What Interventions are Cost Effective in Reducing Violence Against Women? A Scoping Review.
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2024 May;22(3):283-296. doi: 10.1007/s40258-023-00870-0. Epub 2024 Jan 27.
7
Global, regional, and national prevalence estimates of physical or sexual, or both, intimate partner violence against women in 2018.
Lancet. 2022 Feb 26;399(10327):803-813. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02664-7. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
8
Are We Asking Too Much of the Health Sector? Exploring the Readiness of Brazilian Primary Healthcare to Respond to Domestic Violence Against Women.
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Jul 1;11(7):961-972. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.237. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
9
Randomized  Controlled Trials Versus Real-World Data in the COVID-19 Era: A False Narrative.
Cancer Invest. 2020 Nov;38(10):537-542. doi: 10.1080/07357907.2020.1841922. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
10
[Health administrators and public policies to deal with gender violence against women in São Paulo, Brazil].
Cad Saude Publica. 2018 Aug 20;34(8):e00140017. doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00140017.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验