de Jalon Perfecto Diego Garcia, JoséHarrison Francisco Juan, Johnson Kenneth Ian, Kozma Carlos, Schnelle Kurt
Department of Pharmacology, Medical Faculty, Universidad Complutense, Madrid 3 Spain IPHAR Institute for Clinical Pharmacology, MunichF.R.G.
Pain. 1985 Jun;22(2):183-189. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(85)90178-2.
This report describes the effects of a modified cold pressure technique (MCP) on the dominant hand of 6 healthy right-handed volunteers, after single p.o. doses of codeine (60 mg), aspirin (1 g) and placebo in a cross-over, double-blind design. The method employed 9 serial tests on each study day, involving 5 consecutive 2 min periods of hand immersion in an equilibrating bath at constant temperature (37 degrees C), followed by a stimulating bath (0 degree C +/- 0.5) containing 15% ethylene glycol. For better control of peripheral circulatory temperature changes, a blood pressure cuff was inflated to 20 mm Hg below diastolic BP on the right upper arm, thereby preventing venous return from the lower arm during MCP stimulation. Although the test population was relatively small, the results showed a difference between aspirin, codeine and placebo. Codeine was statistically different from placebo (P less than 0.05). It is concluded that this modified technique offers a stable and sensitive method for the early assessment of analgesic activity.
本报告描述了在一项交叉、双盲设计中,单次口服可待因(60毫克)、阿司匹林(1克)和安慰剂后,改良冷压技术(MCP)对6名健康右利手志愿者优势手的影响。该方法在每个研究日进行9次连续测试,包括5个连续2分钟的手部浸入恒温平衡浴(37摄氏度),随后是含有15%乙二醇的刺激浴(0摄氏度±0.5)。为了更好地控制外周循环温度变化,在上臂右侧将血压袖带充气至舒张压以下20毫米汞柱,从而在MCP刺激期间防止来自下臂的静脉回流。尽管测试人群相对较小,但结果显示阿司匹林、可待因和安慰剂之间存在差异。可待因与安慰剂在统计学上有显著差异(P小于0.05)。结论是,这种改良技术为早期评估镇痛活性提供了一种稳定且敏感的方法。