Moorkamp Matthijs, Torenvlied René, Kramer Eric-Hans
Institute for Management Research Radboud University Nijmegen Nijmegen The Netherlands.
Department of Public Administration University of Twente Enschede The Netherlands.
J Conting Crisis Manag. 2020 Jun;28(2):169-172. doi: 10.1111/1468-5973.12294. Epub 2020 May 19.
Boin (2019) argues that in transboundary crisis management it is almost impossible to achieve centralization and coordination. This article identifies three principles through which actors in a transboundary crisis can balance centralization with autonomy while shaping coordination along the way. We reanalysed three transboundary cases: the Dutch military mission in Afghanistan, the downing of MH17 and hurricane Irma striking Sint-Maarten. The principles we found are as follows: (a) reformulating key strategic priorities, (b) flexible adaptation of crisis management protocols and (c) the emergence of multifunctional units. With these three principles, we reflect on challenges in the Dutch crisis response to the corona outbreak and propose improvements for progressing current crisis management efforts.
博因(2019年)认为,在跨界危机管理中,几乎不可能实现集中化与协调。本文确定了三项原则,跨界危机中的行为体可通过这些原则在实现集中化与自主性之间取得平衡,同时在此过程中形成协调。我们重新分析了三个跨界案例:荷兰在阿富汗的军事任务、马航MH17航班坠毁事件以及飓风“伊尔玛”袭击圣马丁岛。我们发现的原则如下:(a)重新制定关键战略重点,(b)灵活调整危机管理预案,(c)多功能单位的出现。基于这三项原则,我们反思了荷兰应对新冠疫情危机中的挑战,并为推进当前的危机管理工作提出改进建议。