Boys Jos
Learning Environments Equality, Diversity and Inclusion Centre (LEEDIC), Faculty of Built Environment, University College London, The Bartlett, London, UK.
Postdigit Sci Educ. 2022;4(1):13-32. doi: 10.1007/s42438-021-00267-z. Epub 2021 Nov 6.
This article conceptualises higher education as a complex and dynamic set of entangled social, spatial and material practices - enacted, adapted and contested across spaces and technologies as these interact with diverse learners, teachers, curricula and contexts. Using modes of enquiry that start from this inherent complexity and intersecting these with contemporary disability and education studies, I ask how some of the normative social and spatial practices of higher education are being surfaced by the pandemic. Rather than framing Covid-19 as a massive shift from 'normal' (face-to-face) to 'abnormal' (virtual) delivery modes, I propose that its impact both continues and alters assumptions about what constitutes 'proper' university education, and both perpetuates and disrupts what is 'noticed', valued and supported in conventional teaching and learning processes. To do this, I will focus on two themes in current HE practices in the UK, as examples of what such an approach can open-up to view. This starts from the already existing tensions, complexities and contradictions as to what should constitute appropriate teacher and student behaviours and settings, and how this 'normality' is often being perceived as being lost because of the pandemic. By engaging with existing literature about longer-term patterns of inequalities in access and inclusion across physical and virtual HE learning environments, I hope to show some underlying problems in how student competency is being evidenced in virtual as compared to physical space and some ways the pandemic has exposed the unevenness of diverse student and staff relationships to space, time and technologies and the differential impacts on their educational experiences.
本文将高等教育概念化为一系列复杂且动态的社会、空间和物质实践的交织——这些实践在空间和技术中得以实施、调整并引发争议,因为它们与不同的学习者、教师、课程和背景相互作用。运用从这种内在复杂性出发的探究方式,并将其与当代残疾与教育研究相结合,我提出如下问题:疫情使高等教育的一些规范性社会和空间实践呈现出怎样的特点?我并非将新冠疫情视为从“正常”(面对面)教学模式到“异常”(虚拟)教学模式的巨大转变,而是认为其影响既延续又改变了人们对何为“恰当”大学教育的假设,既延续又扰乱了传统教学过程中被“注意到”、重视和支持的内容。为此,我将聚焦于英国当前高等教育实践中的两个主题,以此为例说明这种方法所能揭示的内容。这始于关于何为恰当的教师和学生行为及环境方面已然存在的紧张关系、复杂性和矛盾,以及这种“常态”如何常常因疫情而被视为丧失。通过研读有关实体和虚拟高等教育学习环境中获取机会与融入方面长期不平等模式的现有文献,我希望揭示出与实体空间相比,在虚拟空间中证明学生能力方面存在的一些潜在问题,以及疫情暴露的不同学生和教职员工在空间、时间和技术方面关系的不均衡,及其对他们教育经历的不同影响。