Okada Keisuke, Samreth Sovannroeun
Faculty of Economics, Kansai University, 3-3-35 Yamate-cho, Suita-shi, Osaka 564-8680 Japan.
Graduate School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Saitama University, Shimo-Okubo 255, Sakura-ku, Saitama-shi, Saitama 338-8570 Japan.
J Knowl Econ. 2023 Mar 22:1-14. doi: 10.1007/s13132-023-01266-0.
Productivity growth is important for long-term economic growth and development, and technology adoption is one of its key drivers. This study empirically assesses whether political regimes are a significant determinant of technology diffusion. Specifically, we examine the effects of political regimes on diffusion of technology using data based on a sample of 104 technologies from 137 countries for the period 1901 to 2000. We consider detailed categories of technologies and investigate the differences in the impacts of political regimes on each technology. Our estimation results show that democracy does not have a significant impact on the overall diffusion of technology but it is positively associated with the diffusion of health- and agriculture-related technologies. Furthermore, the diffusion of infrastructure, general, and other sector-specific technologies is not influenced by political regimes. Considering different types of democracies and dictatorships, we find that parliamentary democracy has a positive impact on health- and agriculture-related technology diffusion. On the contrary, all types of dictatorships, namely civilian, military, and royal, have negative impacts on diffusion of technology.
生产率增长对长期经济增长和发展至关重要,而技术采用是其关键驱动因素之一。本研究实证评估政治制度是否是技术扩散的重要决定因素。具体而言,我们使用1901年至2000年期间来自137个国家的104项技术样本数据,考察政治制度对技术扩散的影响。我们考虑技术的详细类别,并研究政治制度对每项技术影响的差异。我们的估计结果表明,民主对技术的总体扩散没有显著影响,但它与健康和农业相关技术的扩散呈正相关。此外,基础设施、一般及其他特定部门技术的扩散不受政治制度影响。考虑不同类型的民主制和独裁制,我们发现议会民主制对健康和农业相关技术的扩散有积极影响。相反,所有类型的独裁制,即文职、军事和王室独裁制,对技术扩散都有负面影响。