Suppr超能文献

封控、信息质量与政治信任:对新冠疫情下上海封控的实证研究

Lockdown, information quality, and political trust: An empirical study of the Shanghai lockdown under COVID-19.

作者信息

Zhai Yida, Han Guanghua

机构信息

School of International and Public Affairs, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China.

出版信息

Int Rev Adm Sci. 2023 Apr 4:00208523231166254. doi: 10.1177/00208523231166254.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Many countries have adopted various measures to curb the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic. The regulation measures of lockdown have triggered changes in public political trust in the government (including in its competence, benevolence and integrity). Information shapes the attitudes and values of residents; this paper aims to study the effect of a lockdown on political trust and the moderating effect from quality of government shared information. From 12 March to 31 May 2022, Shanghai implemented strict lockdown measures. In this study, we randomly sampled the participation information of 1063 participants. Data-based regression analysis shows that lockdown has had a negative impact on all subcategories of political trust. However, timely and accuracy information weakens its negative effect. The accuracy of information moderates the relationship between lockdown and political trust in competence and integrity, while a sufficient supply of information moderates the relationship between lockdown and political trust in benevolence.

POINTS FOR PRACTITIONERS

This study explores how different dimensions of information quality affect each component public's political trust, and thereby inspires practitioners to strategically improve information communication in crisis.

摘要

未标注

许多国家采取了各种措施来遏制新冠疫情的传播。封锁管控措施引发了公众对政府政治信任的变化(包括对其能力、善意和廉洁方面的信任)。信息塑造居民的态度和价值观;本文旨在研究封锁对政治信任的影响以及政府共享信息质量所产生的调节作用。2022年3月12日至5月31日,上海实施了严格的封锁措施。在本研究中,我们随机抽取了1063名参与者的参与信息。基于数据的回归分析表明,封锁对政治信任的所有子类别都产生了负面影响。然而,及时准确的信息会削弱其负面影响。信息的准确性调节了封锁与能力和廉洁方面政治信任之间的关系,而充足的信息供应调节了封锁与善意方面政治信任之间的关系。

从业者要点

本研究探讨了信息质量的不同维度如何影响公众政治信任的各个组成部分,从而激励从业者在危机中战略性地改善信息传播。

相似文献

1
Lockdown, information quality, and political trust: An empirical study of the Shanghai lockdown under COVID-19.
Int Rev Adm Sci. 2023 Apr 4:00208523231166254. doi: 10.1177/00208523231166254.
2
Does Food Safety Risk Perception Affect the Public's Trust in Their Government? An Empirical Study on a National Survey in China.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 May 28;16(11):1874. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16111874.
3
Dutch COVID-19 lockdown measures increased trust in government and trust in science: A difference-in-differences analysis.
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Apr;275:113819. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113819. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
4
Analyzing the factors affecting the attitude of public toward lockdown, institutional trust, and civic engagement activities.
J Community Psychol. 2022 Mar;50(2):806-822. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22681. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
5
Older adults' perceptions of government handling of COVID-19: Predictors of protective behaviors from lockdown to post-lockdown.
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 2;17(2):e0263039. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263039. eCollection 2022.
6
Public trust in the Chinese government and life satisfaction during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Int Rev Adm Sci. 2023 Mar 22:00208523231161297. doi: 10.1177/00208523231161297.
7
Political trust during the Covid-19 pandemic: Rally around the flag or lockdown effects?
Eur J Polit Res. 2021 Nov;60(4):1007-1017. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12425. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
9
Lockdown support, trust and COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs: Insights from the second national lockdown in France.
Health Policy. 2022 Nov;126(11):1103-1109. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.09.004. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
10
COVID-19 lockdown in Italy: the role of social identification and social and political trust on well-being and distress.
Curr Psychol. 2022;41(8):5652-5659. doi: 10.1007/s12144-020-01141-0. Epub 2020 Oct 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Modeling the impact of hospitalization-induced behavioral changes on the spread of COVID-19 in New York City.
Infect Dis Model. 2025 May 27;10(4):1055-1092. doi: 10.1016/j.idm.2025.05.001. eCollection 2025 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Pandemic threat and authoritarian attitudes in Europe: An empirical analysis of the exposure to COVID-19.
Eur Union Polit. 2022 Sep;23(3):417-436. doi: 10.1177/14651165221082517.
2
Lockdown and sustainability: An effective model of information and communication technology.
Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2021 Apr;165:120531. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120531. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
3
Socio-political efficacy explains increase in New Zealanders' pro-environmental attitudes due to COVID-19.
J Environ Psychol. 2022 Feb;79:101751. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101751. Epub 2021 Dec 30.
6
The Psychological Burden of the COVID-19 Pandemic Is Associated With Antisystemic Attitudes and Political Violence.
Psychol Sci. 2021 Sep;32(9):1391-1403. doi: 10.1177/09567976211031847. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
7
Analyzing the factors affecting the attitude of public toward lockdown, institutional trust, and civic engagement activities.
J Community Psychol. 2022 Mar;50(2):806-822. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22681. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
8
Transparent communication about negative features of COVID-19 vaccines decreases acceptance but increases trust.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jul 20;118(29). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2024597118. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
9
Correlates of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Austria: trust and the government.
J Public Health (Oxf). 2022 Mar 7;44(1):e106-e116. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdab122.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验