• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2抗原快速检测]

[SARS-CoV-2 antigen rapid tests].

作者信息

Reuter Tom, Lange Constanze, Zeyher Sharay, Wölk Benno, Kramer Jan

机构信息

LADR Zentrallabor Dr. Kramer & Kollegen, Lauenburger Str. 67, 21502, Geesthacht, Deutschland.

Universität zu Lübeck, Lübeck, Deutschland.

出版信息

Pravent Gesundh. 2022 Aug 9:1-7. doi: 10.1007/s11553-022-00970-0.

DOI:10.1007/s11553-022-00970-0
PMID:40479215
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9363140/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

For detection of SARS-CoV-2-infected persons ("severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2") quantitative Real-Time PCR (qRT-PCR) remains the gold standard. SARS-CoV‑2 antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDTs) have the advantage of being fast and simple to use at any location. According to previous studies, Ag-RDTs seem to have poorer sensitivity and specificity. There are currently a few hundred Ag-RDTs available, but many of them have not been independently evaluated.

OBJECTIVES

Evaluation of diagnostic performance of rapid antigen tests detecting SARS-CoV‑2 from 6 different manufacturers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed Ag-RDTS with naso- and oropharnygeal swabs from laboratory routine which had had already resulted in a positive qRT-PCR test. To exclude possible dilution effects when samples were used for a second time, we also performed qRT-PCR analytics for already used samples. The initially measured Ct values could be confirmed.

RESULTS

Ag-RDTs showed differences in discrimination between positive and negative results. In samples with lower virus concentrations (Ct value > 30), the results were not reliable and the discrimination between negative and positive results was not unambigious.

CONCLUSIONS

Ag-RDTs with high sensitivity allow the identification of highly contagious patients anywhere. There are differences between manufacturers which are important when testing patients. An independent transparent evaluation of Ag-RDTs is necessary.

摘要

背景

对于严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)感染者的检测,定量实时荧光定量聚合酶链反应(qRT-PCR)仍然是金标准。SARS-CoV-2抗原检测快速诊断试验(Ag-RDTs)具有快速且可在任何地点使用的优点。根据以往研究,Ag-RDTs的敏感性和特异性似乎较差。目前有数百种Ag-RDTs可供使用,但其中许多尚未经过独立评估。

目的

评估6家不同制造商生产的检测SARS-CoV-2的快速抗原检测的诊断性能。

材料与方法

我们使用实验室常规采集的鼻咽拭子进行Ag-RDT检测,这些样本的qRT-PCR检测结果已呈阳性。为排除样本再次使用时可能产生的稀释效应,我们还对已使用的样本进行了qRT-PCR分析。最初测得的Ct值能够得到确认。

结果

Ag-RDTs在区分阳性和阴性结果方面存在差异。在病毒浓度较低(Ct值>30)的样本中,结果不可靠,阴性和阳性结果的区分不明确。

结论

高灵敏度的Ag-RDTs能够在任何地点识别出高传染性患者。不同制造商的产品存在差异,这在检测患者时很重要。对Ag-RDTs进行独立透明的评估是必要的。

相似文献

1
[SARS-CoV-2 antigen rapid tests].[严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2抗原快速检测]
Pravent Gesundh. 2022 Aug 9:1-7. doi: 10.1007/s11553-022-00970-0.
2
Comparative evaluation of RT-PCR and antigen-based rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDTs) for SARS-CoV-2 detection: performance, variant specificity, and clinical implications.实时荧光 RT-PCR 与抗原检测试剂用于 SARS-CoV-2 检测的比较评估:性能、变异株特异性和临床意义。
Microbiol Spectr. 2024 Jun 4;12(6):e0007324. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00073-24. Epub 2024 Apr 29.
3
Comparison of Rapid Antigen Tests' Performance Between Delta and Omicron Variants of SARS-CoV-2 : A Secondary Analysis From a Serial Home Self-testing Study.德尔塔和奥密克戎变异株 SARS-CoV-2 的快速抗原检测性能比较:一项连续家庭自测研究的二次分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2022 Dec;175(12):1685-1692. doi: 10.7326/M22-0760. Epub 2022 Oct 11.
4
Avoiding False-Positive SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test Results with Point-of-Care Molecular Testing on Residual Test Buffer.利用即时分子检测技术对残余检测缓冲液进行检测,避免 SARS-CoV-2 快速抗原检测出现假阳性结果。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Aug 31;10(4):e0063922. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00639-22. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
5
Regional Evaluation of Two SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Rapid Diagnostic Tests in East Africa.东非地区两种 SARS-CoV-2 抗原快速诊断检测试剂的评估。
Microbiol Spectr. 2023 Jun 15;11(3):e0489522. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.04895-22. Epub 2023 Apr 3.
6
A Multicenter Clinical Diagnostic Accuracy Study of SureStatus, an Affordable, WHO Emergency Use-Listed, Rapid, Point-Of-Care Antigen-Detecting Diagnostic Test for SARS-CoV-2.一项关于 SureStatus 的多中心临床诊断准确性研究,SureStatus 是一种负担得起的、世界卫生组织紧急使用清单上列出的、快速的、即时抗原检测诊断 SARS-CoV-2 的诊断测试。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Oct 26;10(5):e0122922. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01229-22. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
7
Impaired performance of SARS-CoV-2 antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic tests at elevated and low temperatures.在高温和低温环境下,SARS-CoV-2 抗原检测快速诊断测试的性能受损。
J Clin Virol. 2021 May;138:104796. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2021.104796. Epub 2021 Mar 16.
8
Performance of rapid antigen tests to detect SARS-CoV-2 variant diversity and correlation with viral culture positivity: implication for diagnostic development and future public health strategies.快速抗原检测用于检测SARS-CoV-2变异多样性及其与病毒培养阳性的相关性:对诊断发展和未来公共卫生策略的启示
mBio. 2024 Dec 11;15(12):e0273724. doi: 10.1128/mbio.02737-24. Epub 2024 Oct 31.
9
Accuracy of rapid point-of-care antigen-based diagnostics for SARS-CoV-2: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression analyzing influencing factors.基于快速床边抗原检测的 SARS-CoV-2 准确性:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析,以及荟萃回归分析影响因素。
PLoS Med. 2022 May 26;19(5):e1004011. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004011. eCollection 2022 May.
10
Diagnostic performance of CerTest and Panbio antigen rapid diagnostic tests to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 infection.用于诊断 SARS-CoV-2 感染的 CerTest 和 Panbio 抗原快速诊断检测的诊断性能。
J Clin Virol. 2021 Apr;137:104781. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2021.104781. Epub 2021 Feb 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative sensitivity evaluation for 122 CE-marked rapid diagnostic tests for SARS-CoV-2 antigen, Germany, September 2020 to April 2021.2020 年 9 月至 2021 年 4 月德国对 122 种经 CE 标记的 SARS-CoV-2 抗原快速诊断检测试剂的比较敏感性评估。
Euro Surveill. 2021 Nov;26(44). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.44.2100441.
2
Accuracy of novel antigen rapid diagnostics for SARS-CoV-2: A living systematic review and meta-analysis.新型 SARS-CoV-2 抗原快速诊断准确性的系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS Med. 2021 Aug 12;18(8):e1003735. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003735. eCollection 2021 Aug.
3
Head-to-head performance comparison of self-collected nasal versus professional-collected nasopharyngeal swab for a WHO-listed SARS-CoV-2 antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic test.自行采集的鼻腔拭子与专业采集的鼻咽拭子用于世界卫生组织清单上的 SARS-CoV-2 抗原检测快速诊断检测的头对头性能比较。
Med Microbiol Immunol. 2021 Aug;210(4):181-186. doi: 10.1007/s00430-021-00710-9. Epub 2021 May 24.
4
Rapid, point-of-care antigen and molecular-based tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.用于 SARS-CoV-2 感染诊断的快速、即时抗原和基于分子的检测。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 24;3(3):CD013705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013705.pub2.
5
Quantifying the impact of quarantine duration on COVID-19 transmission.量化隔离时长对 COVID-19 传播的影响。
Elife. 2021 Feb 5;10:e63704. doi: 10.7554/eLife.63704.
6
Viral Cultures for Coronavirus Disease 2019 Infectivity Assessment: A Systematic Review.评估 2019 年冠状病毒病传染性的病毒培养:系统评价。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Dec 6;73(11):e3884-e3899. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1764.
7
Duration of infectiousness and correlation with RT-PCR cycle threshold values in cases of COVID-19, England, January to May 2020.2020 年 1 月至 5 月期间,英国 COVID-19 病例的传染性持续时间及其与 RT-PCR 循环阈值的相关性。
Euro Surveill. 2020 Aug;25(32). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.32.2001483.
8
Assessment of SARS-CoV-2 Screening Strategies to Permit the Safe Reopening of College Campuses in the United States.评估 SARS-CoV-2 筛查策略,以允许美国大学校园安全重新开放。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e2016818. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.16818.
9
Development and Evaluation of a duo SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR Assay Combining Two Assays Approved by the World Health Organization Targeting the Envelope and the RNA-Dependant RNA Polymerase (RdRp) Coding Regions.联合世界卫生组织批准的针对包膜和 RNA 依赖的 RNA 聚合酶(RdRp)编码区的两种检测试剂的双 SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR 检测试剂的开发和评估。
Viruses. 2020 Jun 25;12(6):686. doi: 10.3390/v12060686.
10
Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: implications for virus origins and receptor binding.新冠病毒的基因组特征和流行病学:对病毒起源和受体结合的影响。
Lancet. 2020 Feb 22;395(10224):565-574. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30251-8. Epub 2020 Jan 30.