Suppr超能文献

调强放疗时代鼻咽癌的最佳诱导化疗疗程:基于EBV DNA和美国癌症联合委员会分期的递归划分风险分层分析

Optimal induction chemotherapy courses in nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the IMRT era: A recursive partitioning risk stratification analysis based on EBV DNA and AJCC staging.

作者信息

Liang Yu-Jing, Luo Mei-Juan, Wen Dong-Xiang, Wang Pan, Tang Lin-Quan, Mai Hai-Qiang, Liu Li-Ting

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China.

Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China.

出版信息

Oral Oncol. 2025 Aug;167:107404. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2025.107404. Epub 2025 Jun 5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the prognosis and adverse effects in patients treated with different courses of induction chemotherapy (IC) in the intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) era.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

4404 patients diagnosed from 2008 to 2021 were enrolled. Our primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was applied to derive a risk stratification system. The inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to reduce or eliminate the effect of unbalanced characteristics between subgroups. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to assess the survival rates and cox analysis was applied to evaluate the relationship between variables and endpoints.

RESULTS

The RPA-based risk stratification comprising pretreatment EBV DNA (pIC-EBV DNA) level and the AJCC staging system identified 3 different risk groups, and there was no statistically significant difference in patients receiving different courses of IC in PFS in the entire cohort. The IPTW-adjusted analyses showed that there was no significant difference in patients receiving different courses of IC in the entire group and different risk groups. The multivariate Cox analyses also revealed that the number of courses in IC was not associated with PFS in the entire cohort (3 courses vs 2 courses: HR, 0.95, 95 %CI: 0.77-1.17; 4-6 courses vs 2 courses: HR, 0.83, 95 %CI: 0.59-1.16).

CONCLUSION

Two courses may be the optimal induction chemotherapy courses for locoregionally advanced NPC patients in the IMRT era. Additional courses of IC should be applied with caution, since patients may not benefit from more courses but instead suffer more adverse events.

摘要

目的

比较在调强放射治疗(IMRT)时代接受不同疗程诱导化疗(IC)的患者的预后和不良反应。

材料与方法

纳入2008年至2021年诊断的4404例患者。我们的主要终点是无进展生存期(PFS)。应用递归划分分析(RPA)得出风险分层系统。采用治疗权重逆概率(IPTW)来减少或消除亚组间特征不平衡的影响。使用Kaplan-Meier生存曲线评估生存率,并应用Cox分析评估变量与终点之间的关系。

结果

基于RPA的风险分层包括治疗前EBV DNA(pIC-EBV DNA)水平和美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)分期系统,确定了3个不同的风险组,在整个队列中,接受不同疗程IC的患者在PFS方面无统计学显著差异。IPTW调整分析显示,在整个组和不同风险组中,接受不同疗程IC的患者无显著差异。多变量Cox分析还显示,在整个队列中,IC的疗程数与PFS无关(3个疗程与2个疗程:HR,0.95,95%CI:0.77-1.17;4-6个疗程与2个疗程:HR,0.83,95%CI:0.59-1.16)。

结论

在IMRT时代,两个疗程可能是局部晚期鼻咽癌患者的最佳诱导化疗疗程。IC的额外疗程应谨慎应用,因为患者可能无法从更多疗程中获益,反而会遭受更多不良事件。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验