Tian Yuan, Lu Qianqian, Yuan Yuxin, Hu Zhouting, Li Wangyu, Li Kai
Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250033, Shandong Province, China.
Operation Room, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130033, Jilin Province, China.
Sci Rep. 2025 Jun 6;15(1):19913. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-04699-6.
Total hip arthroplasty can cause moderate and severe pain that can have a profound impact during postoperative rehabilitation. Regional nerve block is recommended for anesthesia and analgesia during hip surgery. In particular, the iliac fascia space block of the inguinal ligament is a widely used technique in clinical practice that can block the femoral nerve trunk, obturator nerve trunk, and lateral femoral cutaneous nerve simultaneously. This study aimed to compare the effect of supra-inguinal fascia iliaca compartment block (S-FICB) to a combination of pericapsular nerve group block (PNGB) and lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block (LFCNB) on block range and analgesia as well as motor function of patients with total hip arthroplasty. Sixty patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty through posterolateral approach were randomly divided into two groups with 30 patients each. After complete awakening from general anesthesia, patients received ultrasound-guided S-FICB with 40 mL 0.4% ropivacaine (group S) or 20 mL 0.4% ropivacaine PNGB combined with 3 mL 0.4% ropivacaine LFCNB (PH group). We used the Numerical Rating Scale and cumulative dosage of sufentanil to grade pain during the first 48 h. Quadriceps femoris muscle and adductor muscle strength, range of sensory block, length of stay, and complications were also recorded. No significant differences were found in analgesic indicators of both groups (P>0.05). The Numerical Rating Scale scores of resting pain at each time point after the blockage were significantly lower than those before the blockage (P<0.05). However, the PH group had significantly less incidence of analgesia sensation in the anterior and medial side of the thigh (P < 0.05), and less incidence of quadriceps and adductor weakness (P<0.05) at 1 h and 6 h after the blockage compared to that in group S. Compared to S-FICB, the combination of PNGB and LFCNB provided equivalent analgesic effect and significantly lowered the risk of numbness and muscle weakness of the thigh, which is more conducive to early postoperative exercise and rehabilitation .This combination can be used as a new option in multimodal analgesia after total hip arthroplasty.Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (no. ChiCTR2200055963, date of registration 29/01/2022).
全髋关节置换术可导致中度和重度疼痛,这会对术后康复产生深远影响。建议在髋关节手术期间采用区域神经阻滞进行麻醉和镇痛。特别是,腹股沟韧带的髂筋膜间隙阻滞是临床实践中广泛使用的技术,可同时阻滞股神经干、闭孔神经干和股外侧皮神经。本研究旨在比较腹股沟上筋膜髂筋膜间隙阻滞(S-FICB)与关节周围神经组阻滞(PNGB)联合股外侧皮神经阻滞(LFCNB)对全髋关节置换术患者的阻滞范围、镇痛效果以及运动功能的影响。60例行后外侧入路全髋关节置换术的患者被随机分为两组,每组30例。全身麻醉完全苏醒后,患者接受超声引导下40 mL 0.4%罗哌卡因的S-FICB(S组)或20 mL 0.4%罗哌卡因的PNGB联合3 mL 0.4%罗哌卡因的LFCNB(PH组)。我们使用数字评分量表和舒芬太尼的累积剂量对前48小时的疼痛进行分级。还记录了股四头肌和内收肌力量、感觉阻滞范围、住院时间和并发症。两组的镇痛指标无显著差异(P>0.05)。阻滞术后各时间点静息痛的数字评分量表得分均显著低于阻滞前(P<0.05)。然而,与S组相比,PH组在阻滞后1小时和6小时大腿前内侧镇痛感觉的发生率显著较低(P<0.05),股四头肌和内收肌无力的发生率也较低(P<0.05)。与S-FICB相比,PNGB和LFCNB联合使用提供了等效的镇痛效果,并显著降低了大腿麻木和肌肉无力的风险,这更有利于术后早期运动和康复。这种联合用药可作为全髋关节置换术后多模式镇痛的新选择。试验注册:中国临床试验注册中心(注册号:ChiCTR2200055963,注册日期:2022年1月29日)。