Aunjitsakul Warut, Anantapong Kanthee, Jiraphan Aimorn, Teetharatkul Teerapat, Sathaporn Katti, Buathong Napakkawat, Wiwattanaworaset Pakawat
Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, 90110, Songkhla, Thailand.
Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, 90110, Songkhla, Thailand.
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Jun 6;25(1):589. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-07049-y.
The Social Functioning Scale (SFS) is widely used to evaluate social functioning in individuals with schizophrenia. While validated in various cultural contexts, adaptation for Thailand is necessary to address cultural and contextual nuances. This study aimed to translate and culturally adapt the SFS into Thai and assess its reliability and validity.
A sample of 109 individuals (52.3% female) diagnosed with schizophrenia was recruited from a university hospital in Thailand. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and reliability tests were conducted on six subscales of the Modified SFS- Thai version. Concurrent validity was assessed using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0), Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS), Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS), and Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS).
EFA of four subscales-Independence Performance, Recreation, Pro-Social, and Independence Competence-revealed distinct factor structures with strong loadings. The Employment and Withdrawal/Interpersonal subscales could not undergo EFA due to binary items and insufficient sampling adequacy. Cronbach's alpha values of the modified subscales ranged from 0.75 to 0.87, indicating good internal consistency. Significant correlations with WHODAS 2.0, SOFAS, SAPS, and SANS confirmed the scale's validity.
The Modified SFS- Thai version is a reliable and valid tool for assessing social functioning in individuals with schizophrenia. Its cultural adaptation enhances its relevance in Southeast Asia, offering valuable insights for clinical practice and research in low- and middle-income countries.
社会功能量表(SFS)被广泛用于评估精神分裂症患者的社会功能。尽管该量表已在多种文化背景下得到验证,但为了应对文化和背景的细微差异,对其进行泰国文化适应性调整是必要的。本研究旨在将SFS翻译成泰语并进行文化适应性调整,同时评估其信度和效度。
从泰国一家大学医院招募了109名被诊断为精神分裂症的个体(52.3%为女性)。对修改后的泰语版SFS的六个子量表进行探索性因子分析(EFA)和信度测试。使用世界卫生组织残疾评定量表2.0(WHODAS 2.0)、社会和职业功能评定量表(SOFAS)、阳性症状评定量表(SAPS)和阴性症状评定量表(SANS)评估同时效度。
四个子量表——独立表现、娱乐、亲社会和独立能力——的EFA显示出具有强载荷的独特因子结构。由于二分法项目和抽样充足性不足,就业和退缩/人际子量表无法进行EFA。修改后的子量表的Cronbach's alpha值范围为0.75至0.87,表明具有良好的内部一致性。与WHODAS 2.0、SOFAS、SAPS和SANS的显著相关性证实了该量表的效度。
修改后的泰语版SFS是评估精神分裂症患者社会功能的可靠且有效的工具。其文化适应性增强了它在东南亚地区的相关性,为低收入和中等收入国家的临床实践和研究提供了有价值的见解。