Rigney Brian, Murphy Evelyn P, De Grae Meadhbh Ni Mhiochain, Fenelon Christopher, Kearns Stephen R, Shannon Fintan, Murphy Colin G, Sheridan Gerard A
University Hospital Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025 Jun 8;35(1):238. doi: 10.1007/s00590-025-04358-6.
This study investigates the claim that the majority of elderly patients undergoing elective total hip arthroplasty (THA) that would routinely be treated with a collared cementless stem are just one fall away from a neck of femur fracture that would then commit them to a cemented femoral prosthesis in many other institutions. This study aims to compare the incidence of intra-operative periprosthetic fracture (PPF) and early postoperative PPF using a cementless collared femoral stem between 500 consecutive elective total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients and 500 consecutive neck of femur (NOF) fracture patients treated with a hemiarthroplasty.
This was a single-institution retrospective cohort study between August 2015 and December 2023 assessing 500 consecutive NOF fractures and 500 consecutive elective THAs treated with a single brand of collared cementless femoral stem. The primary outcome measure was intra-operative PPF. Secondary outcome measures included early PPF, defined as PPF within 90 days of initial surgery and 90-day mortality.
The mean age in the THA group was 66 (range 32-94) with 246/500 (49.2%) patients being female. In the NOF group, the mean age was 80 (range 45-102) with 350/500 (70%) of patients being female. In the THA group, seven (1.4%) of patients sustained an intra-operative fracture compared with 15 (3%) patients in the NOF group (p = 0.09). There were three (0.6%) early PPFs in the elective group compared to four (0.8%) in the NOF group (p = 0.7). The 90-day mortality was zero in the elective group and 8.8% in the NOF group. None of the NOF patients with an intra-operative fracture died at the time of follow-up.
Collared cementless femoral stems are safe for use in hemiarthroplasty for hip fracture, especially in an institution that performs cementless HA as standard practice for all hip fractures requiring hemiarthroplasty.
本研究调查了一种说法,即大多数接受择期全髋关节置换术(THA)的老年患者,若常规采用带颈无骨水泥柄进行治疗,那么他们距离股骨颈骨折可能仅一步之遥,而在许多其他机构,这种骨折会使他们需要使用骨水泥型股骨假体。本研究旨在比较连续500例接受择期全髋关节置换术(THA)的患者与连续500例接受半髋关节置换术治疗的股骨颈(NOF)骨折患者,使用无骨水泥带颈股骨柄时术中假体周围骨折(PPF)和术后早期PPF的发生率。
这是一项在2015年8月至2023年12月期间进行的单机构回顾性队列研究,评估了连续500例NOF骨折患者和连续500例接受择期THA且使用单一品牌无骨水泥带颈股骨柄的患者。主要结局指标是术中PPF。次要结局指标包括早期PPF(定义为初次手术后90天内的PPF)和90天死亡率。
THA组的平均年龄为66岁(范围32 - 94岁),其中女性患者246/500(49.2%)。在NOF组中,平均年龄为80岁(范围45 - 102岁),女性患者350/500(70%)。在THA组中,7例(1.4%)患者发生术中骨折,而NOF组中有15例(