Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Elda University Hospital, Elda, Alicante, Spain; Department of Traumatology and Orthopaedics, Miguel Hernandez University, San Juan de Alicante, Alicante, Spain.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Elda University Hospital, Elda, Alicante, Spain.
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jun;34(6):1179-1183. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.02.036. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of a cementless, modular, fluted, long-stem hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of Vancouver type B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fracture around hip hemiarthroplasty.
This was a retrospective case-control study comparing 46 patients revised to hemiarthroplasty (HA group) and 31 revised to total hip arthroplasty (THA group). Functional outcome was evaluated by the Merle d'Aubigné score, and the Katz scale based on activities of daily living. Comorbidity was assessed by the Charlson index, and cognitive function by a mini-mental test score. Radiological evaluation was also performed.
Mean postoperative follow-up was 3.3 (range, 2-4) years in the HA group and 3.9 (range, 2-5) in the THA group. The need for transfusion and hospital stay were significantly higher in the THA group. Postoperatively, both groups had a significant decrease in mean hip function (P = .001) although the mean Merle (P = .121) and Katz (P = .214) scores were similar at final follow-up. Likewise, there were no significant differences between groups in pain or loss of life independence. All fractures were united but one in the HA group. There were no dislocations in the HA group, and 3 in the THA group.
The management of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fracture around hemiarthroplasties with a long-stem revision cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty, supplemented with wire cerclages and cancellous allograft, was an effective option in terms of fracture healing and stability of the implant with a low rate of complications. Nevertheless, a significant functional impairment was also observed in either group.
本研究旨在评估非骨水泥、模块化、有槽、长柄半髋关节置换术治疗髋关节半髋关节置换术后周围 Vancouver B2 和 B3 型假体周围股骨骨折的效果。
这是一项回顾性病例对照研究,比较了 46 例翻修为半髋关节置换术(HA 组)和 31 例翻修为全髋关节置换术(THA 组)的患者。功能结果采用 Merle d'Aubigné 评分和日常生活活动的 Katz 量表进行评估。共病采用 Charlson 指数评估,认知功能采用 mini-mental 测试评分评估。还进行了放射学评估。
HA 组平均术后随访 3.3 年(范围 2-4 年),THA 组平均随访 3.9 年(范围 2-5 年)。THA 组的输血需求和住院时间明显更高。尽管最终随访时 Merle(P=0.121)和 Katz(P=0.214)评分均值相似,但两组术后髋关节功能均显著下降(P=0.001)。同样,两组在疼痛或丧失生活独立性方面无显著差异。所有骨折均愈合,但 HA 组有 1 例骨折。HA 组无脱位,THA 组有 3 例脱位。
对于髋关节半髋关节置换术后周围 Vancouver B2 和 B3 型假体周围股骨骨折,采用长柄非骨水泥双极半髋关节翻修,辅以钢丝环扎和松质骨移植物,是一种有效的治疗方法,骨折愈合和假体稳定性良好,并发症发生率低。然而,两组的功能损伤也很明显。