Suppr超能文献

大型胰腺透X线结石的治疗。

Treatment of large pancreatic radiolucent stone.

作者信息

Wang Dan, An Wei, Yi Jin-Hui, Wang Fan, Li Zhao-Shen, Hu Liang-Hao

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Clinical Research Unit, Changhai Hospital, National Key Laboratory of Immunity and Inflammation, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200000, China.

Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Clinical Research Unit, Changhai Hospital, National Key Laboratory of Immunity and Inflammation, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200000, China.

出版信息

Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2025 Aug;24(4):404-411. doi: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2025.05.003. Epub 2025 May 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have not clarified the treatment of large pancreatic radiolucent stones (≥ 5 mm). The primary objective of this study was to assess the clinical features and therapeutic efficacy in patients with chronic pancreatitis who have large radiolucent stones, and to propose a treatment strategy.

METHODS

This analysis examined the data of patients with large pancreatic ductal stones (≥ 5 mm) from March 2011 to June 2018. Patients with radiolucent stones were classified as the radiolucent stones group, while those with pancreatic radiopaque stones presented at the same time were randomly selected as controls in a 1:2 ratio. Data on demographics, disease courses and treatment details were retrieved, and stone clearance and pain relief during the follow-up were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 52 patients with large radiolucent stones and 104 patients with large radiopaque stones were included in the study. Pancreatic extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) was the initial treatment for large radiopaque stone. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was the first-step treatment for all patients in the radiolucent stones group, of which one patient received medication after failed ERCP cannulation, and four who failed stone extraction were treated with ESWL following the placement of a nasopancreatic catheter. There was no significant difference in the complete stone clearance rate (75.0% vs. 78.8%; P = 0.553) between the two groups. Among the 51 patients in the large radiolucent stones group who were followed up for 5.8 years (range 2.1-12.6), complete pain relief was achieved in 42 patients (82.4%), with no significant difference compared with the radiopaque group (82.4% vs. 76.4%; P = 0.409).

CONCLUSIONS

ERCP is an effective endotherapy for large radiolucent stone and should be considered the first-step treatment. When stone extraction failed during ERCP, ESWL is recommended following the placement of a nasopancreatic catheter.

摘要

背景

既往研究尚未阐明大型胰腺透X线结石(≥5mm)的治疗方法。本研究的主要目的是评估患有大型透X线结石的慢性胰腺炎患者的临床特征和治疗效果,并提出一种治疗策略。

方法

本分析检查了2011年3月至2018年6月期间患有大型胰管结石(≥5mm)的患者的数据。将透X线结石患者分类为透X线结石组,同时将同期出现的不透X线胰腺结石患者按1:2的比例随机选为对照组。检索人口统计学、病程和治疗细节等数据,并比较两组随访期间的结石清除情况和疼痛缓解情况。

结果

本研究共纳入52例大型透X线结石患者和104例大型不透X线结石患者。体外震波碎石术(ESWL)是大型不透X线结石的初始治疗方法。内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)是透X线结石组所有患者的第一步治疗方法,其中1例患者在ERCP插管失败后接受了药物治疗,4例结石取出失败的患者在放置鼻胰管后接受了ESWL治疗。两组的结石完全清除率无显著差异(75.0%对78.8%;P = 0.553)。在大型透X线结石组的51例患者中,随访5.8年(范围2.1 - 12.6年),42例患者(82.4%)实现了完全疼痛缓解,与不透X线结石组相比无显著差异(82.4%对76.4%;P = 0.409)。

结论

ERCP是治疗大型透X线结石的有效内镜治疗方法,应被视为第一步治疗方法。当ERCP期间结石取出失败时,建议在放置鼻胰管后进行ESWL治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验