Suppr超能文献

直视下胰管结石的内镜治疗:革命还是妥协?系统评价。

Endoscopic treatment of pancreatic duct stones under direct vision: Revolution or resignation? Systematic review.

机构信息

Evangelisches Krankenhaus Düsseldorf, Department of Gastroenterology, Düsseldorf, Germany.

出版信息

Dig Endosc. 2018 Jan;30(1):29-37. doi: 10.1111/den.12909. Epub 2017 Jul 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The main treatment aim in chronic pancreatitis (CP) is symptom control and especially pain relief. Management of stone-predominant CP is challenging and requires a multidisciplinary approach. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) has emerged as the cornerstone of non-surgical treatment as a result of disappointing results of available endoscopic treatment options during the last decades. With new developments in the field of direct peroral pancreatoscopy (POP) and intracorporeal lithotripsy, direct intraluminal treatment of main pancreatic duct (MPD) stones returns to the spotlight.

METHODS

Herein, we reviewed the current data on direct pancreatoscopic treatment of MPD stones with a focus on efficiency and safety of available technologies, endoscopes and lithotripsy devices. A systematic Medline search for relevant studies was done.

RESULTS

Ten relevant publications meeting the inclusion criteria were identified (two prospective series, six retrospective trials, two case reports, n = 87 patients). Successful ductal clearance for POP-guided treatment was reported as between 43% and 100% compared to ESWL with 59% to 80%. Adverse event rate for POP-guided therapy was reported as 0-13.5%. One study showed a noticeable higher adverse event rate of 43%. In this trial, POP was carried out after ESWL. There is no reported mortality following POP treatment.

CONCLUSION

Available results are promising in terms of ductal clearance and pain relief compared to standard endoscopic techniques and ESWL as the current gold standard for lithotripsy. Interpretation of this data is limited by the small number of cases for POP and the lack of prospective randomized controlled trials.

摘要

背景与目的

慢性胰腺炎(CP)的主要治疗目标是控制症状,特别是缓解疼痛。以石为主的 CP 的治疗具有挑战性,需要多学科方法。体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)作为非手术治疗的基石,是由于过去几十年中可用的内镜治疗选择效果不佳而出现的。随着经口直接胰腺镜检查(POP)和体内碎石术领域的新发展,直接腔内治疗主胰管(MPD)结石重新成为焦点。

方法

本文回顾了目前关于经胰镜直接治疗 MPD 结石的相关数据,重点关注现有技术、内镜和碎石设备的效率和安全性。对相关研究进行了系统的 Medline 检索。

结果

符合纳入标准的有 10 篇相关文献(2 项前瞻性系列研究、6 项回顾性试验、2 篇病例报告,n=87 例)。与 ESWL 相比,POP 引导治疗的胰管清除率为 43%-100%,成功率为 59%-80%。POP 引导治疗的不良事件发生率为 0-13.5%。有一项研究显示 POP 引导治疗的不良事件发生率较高,为 43%。在该试验中,POP 是在 ESWL 之后进行的。POP 治疗后无死亡报告。

结论

与标准内镜技术和 ESWL 相比,POP 作为目前碎石术的金标准,在胰管清除率和缓解疼痛方面的结果有一定的优势。由于 POP 的病例数量较少,且缺乏前瞻性随机对照试验,因此对这些数据的解释受到限制。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验