• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ePOWER干预措施的可接受性:管理癌症高危人群与癌症相关的不确定性并支持决策制定。

Acceptability of the ePOWER intervention: Managing previvors' cancer-related uncertainty and supporting decision making.

作者信息

Dean Marleah, Jowers Bethany, Conley Claire, Camacho Erica, Espinel Whitney, Kaphingst Kimberly A

机构信息

Department of Communication, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.

Health Outcomes and Behavior Program, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.

出版信息

PEC Innov. 2025 May 10;6:100402. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2025.100402. eCollection 2025 Jun.

DOI:10.1016/j.pecinn.2025.100402
PMID:40485758
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12143645/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Previvors-unaffected individuals who have increased risk of cancer due to a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant in a gene-experience high levels of uncertainty, which is associated with negative outcomes. The ePOWER (empowering Preventive Options for Women Experiencing Risk) intervention is designed to help previvors manage their cancer-related uncertainty and make informed health decisions. In this study, we assessed the acceptability of ePOWER using a multiple methods approach.

METHODS

Previvors ( = 24) completed individual, semi-structured interviews. Previvors first completed the Treatment Acceptability and Preference Scale (TAPS). Additionally, using a Learner Verification & Revision (LV&R) interviewing approach, we also elicited feedback on whether ePOWER was understandable, salient, and satisfactory to previvors. Acceptability was assessed by quantitative data (TAPS scores) and qualitative data (interviews). In analyzing the interview data and integrating the findings, deductive coding was utilized using LV&R categories and inductive thematic analysis was utilized to capture additional nuances from participants' evaluation.

RESULTS

Adequate acceptability was demonstrated by TAPS scores. 88 % of participants exceeded the a priori acceptability threshold (TAPS ≥3). Deductive coding using LV&R categories also confirmed ePOWER was visually appealing, understandable, persuasive, cultural appropriate, and fostered self-efficacy. Inductive thematic analysis expanded on the LV&R categories and identified two additional themes: (1) relatability and emotional support and (2) useful resource.

CONCLUSION

ePOWER is an acceptable intervention to help previvors manage cancer-related uncertainty and support decision making.

INNOVATION

The ePOWER intervention can be shared during healthcare appointments and then utilized continuously by previvors to manage uncertainty and facilitate decisions.

摘要

目的

癌症高危个体(即因基因中的致病或可能致病变异而患癌风险增加的未患病个体)经历着高度的不确定性,这与负面结果相关。ePOWER(增强面临风险女性的预防选择能力)干预旨在帮助癌症高危个体应对与癌症相关的不确定性,并做出明智的健康决策。在本研究中,我们采用多种方法评估了ePOWER的可接受性。

方法

24名癌症高危个体完成了个人半结构化访谈。这些个体首先完成了治疗可接受性和偏好量表(TAPS)。此外,我们采用学习者验证与修订(LV&R)访谈方法,就ePOWER对癌症高危个体而言是否易懂、突出且令人满意征求了反馈意见。通过定量数据(TAPS评分)和定性数据(访谈)评估可接受性。在分析访谈数据并整合研究结果时,使用LV&R类别进行演绎编码,并采用归纳主题分析来捕捉参与者评估中的其他细微差别。

结果

TAPS评分表明ePOWER具有足够的可接受性。88%的参与者超过了先验可接受阈值(TAPS≥3)。使用LV&R类别进行的演绎编码也证实,ePOWER在视觉上具有吸引力、易懂、有说服力、符合文化背景且能增强自我效能感。归纳主题分析在LV&R类别基础上进行了拓展,确定了另外两个主题:(1)相关性和情感支持;(2)有用的资源。

结论

ePOWER是一种可接受的干预措施,有助于癌症高危个体应对与癌症相关的不确定性并支持决策制定。

创新点

ePOWER干预可在医疗预约期间进行分享,然后由癌症高危个体持续使用,以应对不确定性并促进决策制定。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27b1/12143645/7e6106860c1d/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27b1/12143645/7e6106860c1d/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27b1/12143645/7e6106860c1d/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Acceptability of the ePOWER intervention: Managing previvors' cancer-related uncertainty and supporting decision making.ePOWER干预措施的可接受性:管理癌症高危人群与癌症相关的不确定性并支持决策制定。
PEC Innov. 2025 May 10;6:100402. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2025.100402. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
"It was a no-brainer": A qualitative study of factors driving previvors' decision-making when considering risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy.“这是显而易见的”:一项关于影响癌症遗传易感性携带者在考虑行预防性输卵管切除术并延迟卵巢切除术时决策因素的定性研究
Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2022 Feb 26;40:100948. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2022.100948. eCollection 2022 Apr.
3
Previvors' Uncertainty Management Strategies for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer.遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌患者的不确定性管理策略。
Health Commun. 2018 Feb;33(2):122-130. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2016.1250187. Epub 2016 Dec 15.
4
"Where do I go? Who do I go to?": BRCA Previvors, genetic counselors and family planning.“我该何去何从?我该求助于谁?”:BRCA基因携带者、遗传咨询师与计划生育
PEC Innov. 2023 Apr 23;2:100157. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100157. eCollection 2023 Dec.
5
Examining BRCA Previvors' Social Media Content Creation as a Form of Self and Community Care: Qualitative Interview Study.将携带乳腺癌易感基因(BRCA)女性的社交媒体内容创作作为自我及群体关怀形式的研究:质性访谈研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 3;27:e67794. doi: 10.2196/67794.
6
The Previvor Information Journey: Understanding What Helps or Hinders.“先存者”信息之旅:了解哪些因素有助于或阻碍信息获取。
Health Commun. 2024 Sep;39(10):1942-1954. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2023.2248677. Epub 2023 Aug 25.
7
"When information is not enough": A model for understanding BRCA-positive previvors' information needs regarding hereditary breast and ovarian cancer risk.“信息不足”:理解 BRCA 阳性预存者对遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌风险相关信息需求的模型。
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Sep;100(9):1738-1743. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.03.013. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
8
"Take your time, then follow your heart:" Previvors' advice for communicating about family planning after testing positive for a BRCA genetic variant.“慢慢来,然后随心而行”:BRCA基因变异检测呈阳性后,未发病者关于计划生育沟通的建议
Fam Syst Health. 2017 Dec;35(4):486-497. doi: 10.1037/fsh0000312.
9
What Do Breast Cancer Previvors Tell Us About Their Stories? To Know or Not to Know?乳腺癌幸存者向我们讲述了她们的故事?知情还是不知情?
Semin Oncol Nurs. 2024 Oct;40(5):151714. doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2024.151714. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
10
Development of decision aids for female BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers in Germany to support preference-sensitive decision-making.德国用于支持偏好敏感决策的女性 BRCA1 和 BRCA2 突变携带者决策辅助工具的开发。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Jun 5;21(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01528-4.

本文引用的文献

1
The Previvor Information Journey: Understanding What Helps or Hinders.“先存者”信息之旅:了解哪些因素有助于或阻碍信息获取。
Health Commun. 2024 Sep;39(10):1942-1954. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2023.2248677. Epub 2023 Aug 25.
2
"It doesn't really apply to what I'm going through": a mixed-methods study of barriers to palliative care among patients with advanced ovarian cancer.“它并不真正适用于我正在经历的情况”:一项关于晚期卵巢癌患者姑息治疗障碍的混合方法研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2023 Jun 16;31(7):397. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-07832-1.
3
Feasibility, acceptability, and outcomes of a pilot intervention facilitating communication about family building between patients with inherited cancer risk and their partners.
一项试点干预措施促进遗传性癌症风险患者与其伴侣之间关于生育问题沟通的可行性、可接受性及结果
PEC Innov. 2022 Jun 1;1:100055. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100055. eCollection 2022 Dec.
4
Shared Decision-Making Experiences of Couples with Inherited Cancer Risk Regarding Family Building.夫妇在遗传癌症风险下关于家庭生育的共同决策体验。
J Health Commun. 2023 May 4;28(5):292-301. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2023.2202630. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
5
Developing theory-driven narrative messages with personal stories: A step-by-step guide.用个人故事构建理论驱动的叙事信息:一步一步指南。
Psychooncology. 2022 Dec;31(12):2113-2121. doi: 10.1002/pon.6047. Epub 2022 Oct 21.
6
Stress, anxiety, and health-related quality of life in BRCA1/2-positive women with and without cancer: A comparison of four US female samples.携带与未携带癌症的BRCA1/2阳性女性的压力、焦虑及健康相关生活质量:四个美国女性样本的比较
Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2022 Jun 20;42:101033. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2022.101033. eCollection 2022 Aug.
7
Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests.定性研究中饱和度的样本量:实证检验的系统综述。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jan;292:114523. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
8
Learner Verification: A Methodology to Create Suitable Education Materials.学习者验证:创建合适教育材料的方法。
Health Lit Res Pract. 2021 Jan 11;5(1):e49-e59. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20210201-02. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
9
A systematic review of psycho-social interventions for individuals with a BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant.对携带BRCA1/2致病变异个体的心理社会干预措施的系统评价。
J Genet Couns. 2021 Dec;30(6):1695-1706. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1436. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
10
Psychosocial Interventions for Women with a or Mutation: A Scoping Review.针对携带BRCA1或BRCA2突变女性的心理社会干预:一项范围综述。
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Mar 24;13(7):1486. doi: 10.3390/cancers13071486.