Fariyike Olubunmi A, Narayan Nishanth, Liu Hilary Y, Sanchez Danielle R, Phillips H Westley
Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
Front Surg. 2025 May 23;12:1568939. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1568939. eCollection 2025.
For the one-third of epilepsy patients whose disease is refractory to medical therapies, the social, economic, and developmental consequences are often devastating and lifelong. This has sparked great interest in the elucidation of the genetic drivers of epilepsy for the discovery of precision therapies. Over the past 30 years, tissue derived from standard-of-care open resections has provided genetic material for a wealth of research on the genetic mechanisms of epileptic disease. One of the most important findings of this research is the presence of pathogenic brain-limited somatic mutations; however, many patients who would benefit from genetic analysis are not surgical candidates. Further, as minimally invasive techniques such as laser ablation and neuromodulation become increasingly indicated, access to surgically resected brain tissue may become more limited, posing challenges for the research and diagnostic advancements that have traditionally relied on such samples. Fortunately, two minimally invasive methods for obtaining brain-derived genetic material have been developed in recent years. Both cell-free DNA isolated from cerebrospinal fluid and DNA extracted from microbulk tissue adherent to stereo-EEG (sEEG) electrodes have demonstrated sufficient quantity and quality for identification of brain-limited somatic variants. Both techniques have important advantages over surgically obtained bulk-brain tissue and hold promise as new leading avenues of genetic epilepsy research. This article provides a general overview of brain-limited somatic variants in pediatric drug-resistant epilepsy, with a specific focus on the evidence for the use of electrode- and cerebrospinal fluid-derived DNA. We also detail the specific advantages and disadvantages of these minimally invasive techniques as compared to the use of traditional, resection-derived bulk tissue.
对于三分之一药物治疗难治性癫痫患者而言,其社会、经济和发育后果往往具有毁灭性且伴随终生。这引发了人们对阐明癫痫遗传驱动因素以发现精准治疗方法的浓厚兴趣。在过去30年里,来自标准治疗性开放性切除术的组织为大量关于癫痫疾病遗传机制的研究提供了遗传物质。这项研究最重要的发现之一是存在致病性脑局限性体细胞突变;然而,许多能从基因分析中获益的患者并非手术候选对象。此外,随着激光消融和神经调节等微创技术的应用越来越广泛,获取手术切除的脑组织可能会更加受限,这给传统上依赖此类样本的研究和诊断进展带来了挑战。幸运的是,近年来已开发出两种获取脑源性遗传物质的微创方法。从脑脊液中分离出的游离DNA以及从附着于立体脑电图(sEEG)电极的微量组织中提取的DNA,在鉴定脑局限性体细胞变异方面均已证明具有足够的数量和质量。这两种技术相对于通过手术获取的大块脑组织都具有重要优势,并有望成为遗传性癫痫研究的新主要途径。本文概述了儿童耐药性癫痫中的脑局限性体细胞变异,特别关注使用电极和脑脊液衍生DNA的证据。我们还详细阐述了这些微创技术与使用传统切除衍生大块组织相比的具体优缺点。