Laursen Kristian B, Carter-Storch Rasmus, Pellikka Patricia A, Ali Mulham, Mogensen Nils S B, Øvrehus Kristian A, Clavel Marie-Annick, Dahl Jordi S
Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Unit, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense, Denmark.
OPEN, Open Patient Data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense, Denmark.
Eur Heart J Imaging Methods Pract. 2025 May 20;3(1):qyaf063. doi: 10.1093/ehjimp/qyaf063. eCollection 2025 Jan.
In aortic stenosis (AS), estimation of left ventricular (LV) contractility is difficult as most markers of systolic LV function are load-dependent. The ratio of LV ejection fraction (LVEF) to end-systolic wall stress (ESWS), has been widely accepted as a marker of contractility. However, no studies have evaluated if this ratio is affected by loading conditions. The study describes changes in ESWS and ESWS corrected LVEF after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).
In this prospective study, 41 patients with severe AS underwent echocardiography, LV catheterisation, and computed tomography (CT) before and immediately after TAVR. ESWS was estimated from echocardiography alone (ESWS), combining CT LV dimensions and echocardiographic gradients (ESWS ) and combining CT LV dimensions and invasively measured LV end-systolic pressure (ESWS ). ESWS, ESWS and ESWS all decreased significantly after TAVR (89 ± 48 vs. 57 ± 37 Kdynes/cm, < 0.01; 69 ± 8 vs. 51 ± 8 Kdynes/cm, < 0.01, and 197 ± 69 vs. 137 ± 48 Kpa/cm, < 0.01, respectively). We observed weak to moderate associations between the methods. After TAVR, LVEF corrected to ESWS, ESWS and ESWS increased (0.93 ± 0.07 vs. 1.91 ± 2.1, = 0.013; 0.36 ± 0.19 vs. 0.58 ± 0.33, < 0.01, and 0.3 ± 0.02 vs. 2.5 ± 1.5, < 0.01, respectively).
ESWS, ESWS and ESWS decreased significantly after TAVR suggesting they reflect afterload, but independent of method, ESWS corrected LVEF increased slightly post-TAVR, indicating load dependency.
在主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)中,由于大多数左心室(LV)收缩功能标志物依赖于负荷,因此评估左心室收缩力较为困难。左心室射血分数(LVEF)与收缩末期壁应力(ESWS)的比值已被广泛接受为收缩力的标志物。然而,尚无研究评估该比值是否受负荷条件的影响。本研究描述了经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后ESWS及经ESWS校正的LVEF的变化。
在这项前瞻性研究中,41例重度AS患者在TAVR术前及术后即刻接受了超声心动图、左心室导管检查和计算机断层扫描(CT)。ESWS分别通过单独的超声心动图(ESWS)、结合CT左心室尺寸和超声心动图梯度(ESWS )以及结合CT左心室尺寸和有创测量的左心室收缩末期压力(ESWS )进行估算。TAVR术后,ESWS、ESWS 和ESWS 均显著降低(分别为89±48 vs. 57±37 Kdynes/cm,P<0.01;69±8 vs. 51±8 Kdynes/cm,P<0.01,以及197±69 vs. 137±48 Kpa/cm,P<0.01)。我们观察到这些方法之间存在弱至中度的相关性。TAVR术后,经ESWS、ESWS 和ESWS 校正的LVEF升高(分别为0.93±0.07 vs. 1.91±2.1,P = 0.013;0.36±0.19 vs. 0.58±0.33,P<0.01,以及0.3±0.02 vs. 2.5±1.5,P<0.01)。
TAVR术后ESWS、ESWS 和ESWS 显著降低,提示它们反映后负荷,但与方法无关,TAVR术后经ESWS校正的LVEF略有升高,表明存在负荷依赖性。