Alrawashdeh Ahmad, Ihtoub Samar, Alkhatib Zaid I, Alwidyan Mahmoud, Khader Yousef S, Rawashdeh Sukaina, Alqahtani Saeed, Stub Dion, Alhamouri Rahaf, Alkhazali Islam E, Nehme Ziad
Department of Allied Medical Sciences, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
Department of Public Health and Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2025 May 22;13(1):e47. doi: 10.22037/aaemj.v13i1.2627. eCollection 2025.
The diagnostic accuracies of different electrocardiography (ECG) interpretation methods remain unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to systematically evaluate and compare the diagnostic accuracy of prehospital 12-lead ECG interpretation methods for identifying ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and activating cardiac catheterization laboratories (CCLs).
A comprehensive search was conducted in Medline, Scopus, and CINAHL databases up to August 2024. Two reviewers independently selected studies that assessed the diagnostic accuracy of prehospital 12-lead ECG in real-time STEMI identification and CCL activation. Pooled estimates of sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated using bivariate generalized mixed-effects regression models or random-effects meta-analysis as appropriate. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool.
Thirty-six studies involving 67,168 patients were included. Overall, for STEMI identification, the pooled AUC of ECG was 0.96 (95%CI:0.94-0.98), sensitivity was 80% (95% CI, 69-88%), specificity was 97% (95%CI: 94-98%), and DOR was 114 (95%CI: 59-222). Ambulance clinicians achieved the highest DOR (264; 95%CI: 33-2125), followed by transmission method (136; 95%CI, 59-312) and computer-assisted analysis (78; 95%CI: 33-186). Transmission method demonstrated superior specificity (0.98; 95%CI: 0.94-0.99) and the lowest rates of inappropriate (13.2%; 95% CI: 8.6%-19.2%), and false-positive (11.0%; 95%CI: 6.9%-15.0%) CCL activations.
All prehospital ECG interpretation methods yielded acceptable diagnostic accuracy for STEMI identification; however, transmission offered the greatest specificity and fewer unnecessary CCL activations. Adopting transmission-based strategies, where feasible, and enhancing training and decision support for ambulance clinicians may improve prehospital STEMI detection and resource utilization.
不同心电图(ECG)解读方法的诊断准确性仍不明确。因此,本研究旨在系统评估和比较院前12导联心电图解读方法在识别ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)和启动心脏导管实验室(CCL)方面的诊断准确性。
截至2024年8月,在Medline、Scopus和CINAHL数据库中进行了全面检索。两名评审员独立筛选评估院前12导联心电图在实时STEMI识别和CCL启动中诊断准确性的研究。使用双变量广义混合效应回归模型或随机效应荟萃分析,酌情计算敏感性、特异性、诊断比值比(DOR)和曲线下面积(AUC)的合并估计值。使用QUADAS-2工具评估纳入研究的质量。
纳入了36项涉及67168名患者的研究。总体而言,对于STEMI识别,心电图的合并AUC为0.96(95%CI:0.94-0.98),敏感性为80%(95%CI,69-88%),特异性为97%(95%CI:94-98%),DOR为114(95%CI:59-222)。救护车临床医生的DOR最高(264;95%CI:33-2125),其次是传输方法(136;95%CI,59-312)和计算机辅助分析(78;95%CI:33-186)。传输方法显示出更高的特异性(0.98;95%CI:0.94-0.99)以及不适当(13.2%;95%CI:8.6%-19.2%)和假阳性(11.0%;95%CI:6.9%-15.0%)CCL激活率最低。
所有院前心电图解读方法在STEMI识别方面均具有可接受的诊断准确性;然而,传输方法具有最高的特异性和更少的不必要CCL激活。在可行的情况下采用基于传输的策略,并加强对救护车临床医生的培训和决策支持,可能会改善院前STEMI检测和资源利用。