McQueen D M, Peskin C S
Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1985;19(2):139-48. doi: 10.3109/14017438509102709.
This paper describes the application of computer testing to a design study of butterfly bileaflet mitral prostheses having flat or curved leaflets. The curvature is in the plane normal to the pivot axes and is such that the convex sides of the leaflets face each other when the valve is open. The design parameters considered are the curvature of the leaflets and the location of the pivot points. In this study, stagnation is assessed by computing the smallest value (over the three openings of the valve) of the peak velocity, and hemodynamic performance is judged by a benefit/cost ratio: the net stroke volume divided by the mean transvalvular pressure difference. Unlike the case of a pivoting single-disc valve, the inclusion of a constraint on the maximum angle of opening of the leaflets is found to be essential for adequate, competent performance. Results are presented with both 85 degrees and 90 degrees constraints, since best performance is achieved with the opening-angle constraint in this range. Asymmetry of leaflet motion which is observed with flat leaflets in the mitral position is reduced with modest leaflet curvature. Leaflet curvature also ameliorates central orifice stagnation, which is observed with flat leaflets. Curvature of the valve produces the following improvements in comparison with the best flat valve when the opening-angle constraint is 85 degrees: a 38% increase in the minimum peak velocity and a 16% increase in the hemodynamic benefit/cost ratio. With a 90 degrees constraint the corresponding improvements are 34% and 20%, respectively.
本文描述了计算机测试在具有扁平或弯曲瓣叶的蝶形双叶二尖瓣假体设计研究中的应用。曲率位于垂直于枢轴的平面内,使得瓣膜打开时瓣叶的凸面彼此相对。所考虑的设计参数是瓣叶的曲率和枢轴点的位置。在本研究中,通过计算(在瓣膜的三个开口上)峰值速度的最小值来评估停滞情况,并且通过效益/成本比来判断血液动力学性能:净 stroke 容积除以平均跨瓣压差。与枢转单盘瓣膜的情况不同,发现对瓣叶最大开口角度施加约束对于实现充分、有效的性能至关重要。给出了85度和90度约束下的结果,因为在此范围内采用开口角度约束可实现最佳性能。二尖瓣位置扁平瓣叶观察到的瓣叶运动不对称性在瓣叶适度弯曲时会降低。瓣叶弯曲还改善了扁平瓣叶中观察到的中心孔停滞情况。当开口角度约束为85度时,与最佳扁平瓣膜相比,瓣膜的弯曲产生了以下改善:最小峰值速度增加38%,血液动力学效益/成本比增加16%。在90度约束下,相应的改善分别为34%和20%。