Suppr超能文献

论权力剥夺与移动健康

On misempowerment & mobile health.

作者信息

Gray Jesse, Mertes Heidi

机构信息

Department of Philosophy and Moral Sciences, Bioethics Institute Ghent, and Metamedica, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

Med Health Care Philos. 2025 Sep;28(3):549-560. doi: 10.1007/s11019-025-10277-4. Epub 2025 Jun 9.

Abstract

Mobile health tools often claim to empower their users by giving them the knowledge they need to take control of their health. However, this notion of empowerment, what we refer to as the knowledge-control paradigm, only superficially engages with the concept and leaves out the different ways in which people come to be empowered. We first identify two distinct elements of empowerment: psychological empowerment, which pertains to beliefs about one's power and control over their health, and relational empowerment, which is connected with one's actual power to control their health, as well as the ability to hold those in positions of power (the empowered) accountable. The knowledge-control paradigm is incapable of creating empowered individuals in the relational sense, and it is only when knowledge is coupled with both the means and the motivations to control health and/or hold the empowered to account, that one can be considered empowered. Mobile health tools that overemphasize knowledge as the empowering mechanism often misempower their users, that is, they create a belief in users about their power to control their health that does not align with their actual capacity to do so. This mismatch between beliefs and reality can have far reaching consequences as with knowledge, ability, control, and power comes responsibility. We worry not only that the misempowered will be viewed as more responsible for their health than the circumstances permit, but also, that these individuals will lose the ability to hold those in positions of power accountable..

摘要

移动健康工具常常宣称,通过向用户提供掌控自身健康所需的知识来赋予他们权力。然而,这种赋权理念,即我们所说的知识-控制范式,只是表面地涉及这一概念,忽略了人们获得赋权的不同方式。我们首先确定赋权的两个不同要素:心理赋权,它关乎个人对自身健康的权力和控制的信念;关系赋权,它与个人控制自身健康的实际权力以及要求有权势者(被赋权者)承担责任的能力相关。知识-控制范式无法从关系层面造就被赋权的个体,只有当知识与控制健康和/或要求有权势者承担责任的手段及动机相结合时,才能认为一个人获得了赋权。过度强调知识作为赋权机制的移动健康工具常常会错误地赋予用户权力,也就是说,它们在用户心中塑造了一种关于自身控制健康的权力的信念,但这与他们实际控制健康的能力并不相符。信念与现实之间的这种不匹配可能会产生深远的后果,因为伴随着知识、能力、控制和权力而来的是责任。我们不仅担心被错误赋权的人会被认为对自身健康负有超出实际情况允许的更多责任,而且还担心这些人将失去要求有权势者承担责任的能力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验