• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医护人员非正规使用手机和其他移动设备来支持工作:定性证据综合评价。

Healthcare workers' informal uses of mobile phones and other mobile devices to support their work: a qualitative evidence synthesis.

机构信息

Department of Health and Functioning, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway.

Department of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Aug 27;8(8):CD015705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015705.pub2.

DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD015705.pub2
PMID:39189465
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11348462/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Healthcare workers sometimes develop their own informal solutions to deliver services. One such solution is to use their personal mobile phones or other mobile devices in ways that are unregulated by their workplace. This can help them carry out their work when their workplace lacks functional formal communication and information systems, but it can also lead to new challenges.

OBJECTIVES

To explore the views, experiences, and practices of healthcare workers, managers and other professionals working in healthcare services regarding their informal, innovative uses of mobile devices to support their work.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and Scopus on 11 August 2022 for studies published since 2008 in any language. We carried out citation searches and contacted study authors to clarify published information and seek unpublished data.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included qualitative studies and mixed-methods studies with a qualitative component. We included studies that explored healthcare workers' views, experiences, and practices regarding mobile phones and other mobile devices, and that included data about healthcare workers' informal use of these devices for work purposes.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We extracted data using an extraction form designed for this synthesis, assessed methodological limitations using predefined criteria, and used a thematic synthesis approach to synthesise the data. We used the 'street-level bureaucrat' concept to apply a conceptual lens to our findings and prepare a line of argument that links these findings. We used the GRADE-CERQual approach to assess our confidence in the review findings and the line-of-argument statements. We collaborated with relevant stakeholders when defining the review scope, interpreting the findings, and developing implications for practice.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 30 studies in the review, published between 2013 and 2022. The studies were from high-, middle- and low-income countries and covered a range of healthcare settings and healthcare worker cadres. Most described mobile phone use as opposed to other mobile devices, such as tablets. We have moderate to high confidence in the statements in the following line of argument. The healthcare workers in this review, like other 'street-level bureaucrats', face a gap between what is expected of them and the resources available to them. To plug this gap, healthcare workers develop their own strategies, including using their own mobile phones, data and airtime. They also use other personal resources, including their personal time when taking and making calls outside working hours, and their personal networks when contacting others for help and advice. In some settings, healthcare workers' personal phone use, although unregulated, has become a normal part of many work processes. Some healthcare workers therefore experience pressure or expectations from colleagues and managers to use their personal phones. Some also feel driven to use their phones at work and at home because of feelings of obligation towards their patients and colleagues. At best, healthcare workers' use of their personal phones, time and networks helps humanise healthcare. It allows healthcare workers to be more flexible, efficient and responsive to the needs of the patient. It can give patients access to individual healthcare workers rather than generic systems and can help patients keep their sensitive information out of the formal system. It also allows healthcare workers to communicate with each other in more personalised, socially appropriate ways than formal systems allow. All of this can strengthen healthcare workers' relationships with community members and colleagues. However, these informal approaches can also replicate existing social hierarchies and deepen existing inequities among healthcare workers. Personal phone use costs healthcare workers money. This is a particular problem for lower-level healthcare workers and healthcare workers in low-income settings as they are likely to be paid less and may have less access to work phones or compensation. Out-of-hours use may also be more of a burden for lower-level healthcare workers, as they may find it harder to ignore calls when they are at home. Healthcare workers with poor access to electricity and the internet are less able to use informal mobile phone solutions, while healthcare workers who lack skills and training in how to appraise unendorsed online information are likely to struggle to identify trustworthy information. Informal digital channels can help healthcare workers expand their networks. But healthcare workers who rely on personal networks to seek help and advice are at a disadvantage if these networks are weak. Healthcare workers' use of their personal resources can also lead to problems for patients and can benefit some patients more than others. For instance, when healthcare workers store and share patient information on their personal phones, the confidentiality of this information may be broken. In addition, healthcare workers may decide to use their personal resources on some types of patients, but not others. Healthcare workers sometimes describe using their personal phones and their personal time and networks to help patients and clients whom they assess as being particularly in need. These decisions are likely to reflect their own values and ideas, for instance about social equity and patient 'worthiness'. But these may not necessarily reflect the goals, ideals and regulations of the formal healthcare system. Finally, informal mobile phone use plugs gaps in the system but can also weaken the system. The storing and sharing of information on personal phones and through informal channels can represent a 'shadow IT' (information technology) system where information about patient flow, logistics, etc., is not recorded in the formal system. Healthcare workers may also be more distracted at work, for instance, by calls from colleagues and family members or by social media use. Such challenges may be particularly difficult for weak healthcare systems.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: By finding their own informal solutions to workplace challenges, healthcare workers can be more efficient and more responsive to the needs of patients, colleagues and themselves. But these solutions also have several drawbacks. Efforts to strengthen formal health systems should consider how to retain the benefits of informal solutions and reduce their negative effects.

摘要

背景

医疗工作者有时会自行开发非正规解决方案来提供服务。其中一种解决方案是在工作场所缺乏功能正常的正式沟通和信息系统的情况下,使用他们的个人手机或其他移动设备。这可以帮助他们在工作时开展工作,但也会带来新的挑战。

目的

探索医疗工作者、管理人员和其他在医疗服务领域工作的专业人员对其使用移动设备进行非正式、创新性使用以支持其工作的看法、经验和做法。

检索方法

我们于 2022 年 8 月 11 日在 MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL 和 Scopus 上检索了自 2008 年以来以任何语言发表的研究,以了解医疗工作者对手机和其他移动设备的看法、经验和实践,包括关于医疗工作者出于工作目的非正式使用这些设备的信息。

选择标准

我们纳入了定性研究和混合方法研究,其中包括定性部分。我们纳入了探讨医疗工作者对手机和其他移动设备的看法、经验和实践的研究,包括有关医疗工作者出于工作目的非正式使用这些设备的信息。

数据收集和分析

我们使用专为本次综述设计的提取表格提取数据,使用预设标准评估方法学局限性,并使用主题综合方法对数据进行综合。我们使用“街头官僚”的概念将概念镜头应用于我们的研究结果,并提出一条论证线,将这些发现联系起来。我们使用 GRADE-CERQual 方法评估我们对综述结果和论证陈述的信心。我们与相关利益攸关方合作,定义审查范围、解释研究结果以及制定对实践的影响。

主要结果

我们综述了 30 项研究,这些研究发表于 2013 年至 2022 年期间,来自高、中、低收入国家,涵盖了各种医疗保健环境和医疗保健工作者队伍。大多数研究描述了手机的使用,而不是其他移动设备,如平板电脑。我们对以下论证线中的陈述有中等至高度的信心。本综述中的医疗工作者与其他“街头官僚”一样,面临着他们期望的工作资源与他们可用的资源之间的差距。为了弥补这一差距,医疗工作者制定了自己的策略,包括使用自己的手机、数据和通话时间。他们还利用其他个人资源,包括在工作时间之外拨打电话和接电话的个人时间,以及在寻求帮助和建议时利用个人网络。在一些环境中,尽管不受监管,但医疗工作者的个人电话使用已成为许多工作流程的正常组成部分。因此,一些医疗工作者会受到同事和经理的压力或期望,要求他们使用个人手机。一些人也感到有义务在工作和家中使用手机,因为他们对患者和同事有责任感。在最好的情况下,医疗工作者使用个人手机、时间和网络有助于使医疗服务人性化。它使医疗工作者更加灵活、高效和对患者的需求做出响应。它可以使患者能够接触到个别医疗工作者而不是通用系统,并有助于患者将其敏感信息保留在正式系统之外。它还允许医疗工作者以正式系统允许的更个性化、更合适的方式相互交流。所有这些都可以加强医疗工作者与社区成员和同事的关系。然而,这些非正式方法也可能复制现有的社会等级制度,并加深医疗工作者之间现有的不平等。个人手机的使用使医疗工作者花费金钱。对于基层医疗工作者和低收入环境中的医疗工作者来说,这是一个特别的问题,因为他们的工资可能较低,获得工作电话或补偿的机会可能较少。下班后的使用也可能对基层医疗工作者来说负担更大,因为他们在家时可能更难忽视电话。缺乏电力和互联网接入的医疗工作者使用非正式移动电话解决方案的能力较弱,而缺乏评估未经认可的在线信息技能和培训的医疗工作者可能难以识别可信信息。非正式数字渠道可以帮助医疗工作者扩大他们的网络。但是,如果这些网络薄弱,依赖个人网络寻求帮助和建议的医疗工作者将处于劣势。医疗工作者使用个人资源也可能给患者带来问题,并且可能使一些患者受益多于其他患者。例如,当医疗工作者在个人手机上存储和共享患者信息时,这些信息的保密性可能会被打破。此外,医疗工作者可能会决定在某些类型的患者身上使用个人资源,而在其他患者身上则不使用。医疗工作者有时会描述使用个人手机、个人时间和网络来帮助他们认为特别需要帮助的患者和客户。这些决策可能反映了他们自己的价值观和想法,例如社会公平和患者“价值”。但这些不一定反映正式医疗系统的目标、理想和规定。最后,非正式移动电话的使用填补了系统中的空白,但也可能削弱系统。在个人手机上存储和共享信息以及通过非正式渠道可以代表“影子 IT”(信息技术)系统,其中有关患者流量、物流等的信息未记录在正式系统中。医疗工作者在工作时也可能更加分心,例如,接到同事和家人的电话或使用社交媒体。这些挑战对于脆弱的医疗系统来说可能特别困难。

结论

通过找到解决工作场所挑战的非正式解决方案,医疗工作者可以更高效、更响应患者、同事和自身的需求。但这些解决方案也有几个缺点。加强正式卫生系统的努力应考虑如何保留非正式解决方案的优势并减少其负面影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9eea/11348462/e15be771178d/tCD015705-FIG-01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9eea/11348462/e15be771178d/tCD015705-FIG-01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9eea/11348462/e15be771178d/tCD015705-FIG-01.jpg

相似文献

1
Healthcare workers' informal uses of mobile phones and other mobile devices to support their work: a qualitative evidence synthesis.医护人员非正规使用手机和其他移动设备来支持工作:定性证据综合评价。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Aug 27;8(8):CD015705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015705.pub2.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Parents' and informal caregivers' views and experiences of communication about routine childhood vaccination: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.父母及非正式照料者关于儿童常规疫苗接种沟通的观点与经历:定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 7;2(2):CD011787. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011787.pub2.
4
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
5
Factors that influence parents' and informal caregivers' views and practices regarding routine childhood vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响父母和非正式照顾者对常规儿童疫苗接种看法和做法的因素:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 27;10(10):CD013265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013265.pub2.
6
Perceptions and experiences of the prevention, detection, and management of postpartum haemorrhage: a qualitative evidence synthesis.预防、检测和管理产后出血的认知和经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 27;11(11):CD013795. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013795.pub2.
7
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
8
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
9
Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of lay health worker programmes to improve access to maternal and child health: qualitative evidence synthesis.实施非专业卫生工作者项目以改善孕产妇和儿童健康服务可及性的障碍与促进因素:定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 8;2013(10):CD010414. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010414.pub2.
10
Factors that influence participation in physical activity for people with bipolar disorder: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.影响双相障碍患者参与体育活动的因素:定性证据的综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 4;6(6):CD013557. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013557.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial Intelligence and Automation in Evidence Synthesis: An Investigation of Methods Employed in Cochrane, Campbell Collaboration, and Environmental Evidence Reviews.循证综合中的人工智能与自动化:对Cochrane、坎贝尔协作组织及环境证据综述所采用方法的调查
Cochrane Evid Synth Methods. 2025 Aug 28;3(5):e70046. doi: 10.1002/cesm.70046. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Work-related instant messaging and calling stress (WRIMCS) among physicians: a novel occupational health risk?医生工作相关的即时通讯和通话压力(WRIMCS):一种新的职业健康风险?
J Occup Med Toxicol. 2025 Sep 2;20(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12995-025-00478-1.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Using an online community of practice to explore the informal use of mobile phones by health workers.利用在线实践社区探索卫生工作者对手机的非正式使用情况。
Oxf Open Digit Health. 2023 Jan 4;1:oqac003. doi: 10.1093/oodh/oqac003. eCollection 2023.
2
Digital tracking, provider decision support systems, and targeted client communication via mobile devices to improve primary health care.通过数字追踪、医疗服务提供者决策支持系统以及借助移动设备与目标客户进行沟通,以改善初级卫生保健。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Apr 7;4(4):CD012925. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012925.pub2.
3
Mobile phone use and the welfare of community health nurses in Ghana: An analysis of unintended costs.
Health Care Workers' Perspectives on the Barriers and Facilitators to Digital Health Technology Use to Support Symptomatic Cancer Diagnosis in Southern Africa: Qualitative Study.
医疗工作者对南部非洲使用数字健康技术支持症状性癌症诊断的障碍和促进因素的看法:定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jul 24;27:e68412. doi: 10.2196/68412.
加纳社区健康护士使用手机情况及其福利:意外成本分析
World Dev Perspect. 2021 Sep;23:100317. doi: 10.1016/j.wdp.2021.100317.
4
Influence of Organizational Issues on Nurse Administrators' Support to Staff Nurses' Use of Smartphones for Work Purposes in the Philippines: Focus Group Study.组织问题对菲律宾护士管理人员支持护士使用智能手机开展工作的影响:焦点小组研究
JMIR Nurs. 2020 Jan 10;3(1):e17040. doi: 10.2196/17040. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
5
Nurses as Stakeholders in the Adoption of Mobile Technology in Australian Health Care Environments: Interview Study.澳大利亚医疗保健环境中护士作为移动技术采用利益相关者的访谈研究
JMIR Nurs. 2019 Aug 9;2(1):e14279. doi: 10.2196/14279. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.
6
Decision-support tools via mobile devices to improve quality of care in primary healthcare settings.移动设备决策支持工具改善基层医疗服务质量。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 27;7(7):CD012944. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012944.pub2.
7
Healthcare workers' perceptions and experiences of communicating with people over 50 years of age about vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.医护人员与50岁以上人群就疫苗接种进行沟通的认知与经历:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 20;7(7):CD013706. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013706.pub2.
8
Birth and death notification via mobile devices: a mixed methods systematic review.通过移动设备发送出生和死亡通知:一项混合方法系统评价。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 16;7(7):CD012909. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012909.pub2.
9
Informal mhealth at scale in Africa: Opportunities and challenges.非洲大规模的非正规移动健康:机遇与挑战。
World Dev. 2021 Apr;140:105257. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105257.
10
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.