Suppr超能文献

西非次区域初级保健中心高血压成年患者中世卫组织基于实验室和非基于实验室的心血管疾病风险图表比较。

Comparison of WHO laboratory-based and non-laboratory-based CVD risk charts among hypertensive adults attending primary healthcare centers in West Africa sub-region.

作者信息

Hutton-Mensah Kojo Awotwi, Ibrahim Olayinka Rasheed, Nwankwo Adaku, Nketiah George Bediako, Adeniyi Funmi Temidayo, Natogmah Abukari Yakubu, Ogunmodede James Ayodele, Ojji Dike, Adesola Olumide, Alabi Biodun Sulyman, Mokuolu Olugbenga Ayodeji, Sarpong Daniel

机构信息

Directorate of Medicine, Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Kumasi, Ghana.

Department of Pediatrics, Division of Clinical Medicine, University of Global Health Equity, Kigali, Rwanda.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Jun 9;20(6):e0317640. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317640. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The World Health Organization (WHO) non-laboratory cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk chart is sub-region-specific and is advocated in resource-constrained settings. However, the extent of agreement with laboratory-based assessment among hypertensive adults attending primary health centers (PHCs) in the West Africa sub-region remains unknown. This study compared 10-year CVD risk among adults with hypertension attending PHCs in Ghana and Nigeria.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This cross-sectional study recruited 319 adults with hypertension at PHCs in Ghana and Nigeria. All participants had their blood pressure, anthropometrics, fasting blood sugar, and fasting cholesterol measured following standard procedures. WHO laboratory and non-laboratory CVD risks were assessed and compared using Kappa statistics, correlation, and Bland-Altman Plot.

RESULTS

The median (interquartile range) for laboratory-based and non-laboratory-based CVD risk scores were comparable [7.0 (4.0 11.0) vs. 7.0 (4.0 to 11.0), p = 0.914]. Of the 319 participants, laboratory-based assessment classified 214 (67.1%) as low risk, while 210 (65.8%) were classified as low risk using the non-laboratory method. Eleven (3.4%) and 14 (4.4%) participants were classified as high-risk using laboratory- and non-laboratory-based methods, respectively. Overall, there was a very good positive correlation between the CVD risk assessment methods (r = 0.948, p<0.001). For all participants combined, there was substantial agreement (Kappa statistics), with K = 0.766. Bland-Altman showed a mean bias of 0.15 (SD = 1.74) in favor of non-laboratory-based assessment of CVD with an upper limit of 3.57 and a lower limit of -3.26.

CONCLUSION

There was substantial agreement between laboratory- and non-laboratory-based WHO CVD risk charts in this study. In low-resource settings, such as Ghana and Nigeria, the WHO non-laboratory CVD risk prediction model offers a huge opportunity for primary CVD prevention in adults with hypertension.

摘要

背景

世界卫生组织(WHO)的非实验室心血管疾病(CVD)风险图表是针对特定次区域的,在资源有限的环境中得到提倡。然而,在西非次区域的初级卫生保健中心(PHC)就诊的高血压成年人中,与基于实验室评估的一致性程度尚不清楚。本研究比较了加纳和尼日利亚初级卫生保健中心高血压成年人的10年心血管疾病风险。

材料与方法

这项横断面研究在加纳和尼日利亚的初级卫生保健中心招募了319名高血压成年人。所有参与者均按照标准程序测量了血压、人体测量学指标、空腹血糖和空腹胆固醇。使用Kappa统计、相关性分析和Bland-Altman图评估并比较了WHO实验室和非实验室心血管疾病风险。

结果

基于实验室和非实验室的心血管疾病风险评分中位数(四分位间距)具有可比性[7.0(4.0至11.0)对7.0(4.0至11.0),p = 0.914]。在319名参与者中,基于实验室的评估将214名(67.1%)归类为低风险,而使用非实验室方法将210名(65.8%)归类为低风险。分别有11名(3.4%)和14名(4.4%)参与者使用基于实验室和非实验室的方法被归类为高风险。总体而言,心血管疾病风险评估方法之间存在非常好的正相关性(r = 0.948,p<0.001)。对于所有参与者,存在实质性一致性(Kappa统计),K = 0.766。Bland-Altman分析显示,支持非实验室心血管疾病评估的平均偏差为0.15(标准差 = 1.74),上限为3.57,下限为 -3.26。

结论

本研究中基于实验室和非实验室的WHO心血管疾病风险图表之间存在实质性一致性。在加纳和尼日利亚等资源匮乏的环境中,WHO非实验室心血管疾病风险预测模型为高血压成年人的原发性心血管疾病预防提供了巨大机会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a349/12148134/e07c910b5f8d/pone.0317640.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验