PAPRSB Institute of Health Sciences, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Bandar Seri Begawan, Brunei Darussalam.
NCD Prevention Unit, Ministry of Health, Bandar Seri Begawan, Brunei Darussalam.
BMC Public Health. 2022 Sep 14;22(1):1742. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13944-w.
Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally. This review aimed to summarise evidence on the key features, usability and benefits of CVD risk calculators using digital platforms for CVDs prevention and management in populations.
We used search engines and thematic analyses to conduct a scoping review. As the reporting guideline for this review, we used Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR).
A total of 17 studies meeting eligibility criteria were included in the analysis, from which about 70% of the studies have prognostic level I (n = 8) and level II (n = 4) evidence. The review found that various guidelines are recommending different algorithms for CVD risk prediction. The QRISK® was the most accurate CVD risk calculator for several study populations, whereas World Health Organization/International Society of Hypertension (WHO/ISH) risk scores were the least accurate. The key features of CVD risk calculators are variables, predictive accuracy, discrimination index, applicability, understandability, and cost-effectiveness.
For the selected risk prediction tool, development and validation research must be done, which considers a mix of stroke-specific risk and CVD risk to establish its usability in the local community and advantages to the particular health-care environment. To get healthcare professionals more involved in preventing and treating CVDs, each healthcare setting should use an online CVD risk assessment tool that is more useful, accurate, and easy to use, based on the population and health system.
心血管疾病(CVDs)是全球发病率和死亡率的主要原因。本综述旨在总结使用数字平台进行 CVD 预防和管理的 CVD 风险计算器的主要特征、可用性和获益,以用于人群的 CVD。
我们使用搜索引擎和主题分析进行了范围综述。本综述使用了系统评价和荟萃分析扩展的首选报告项目(PRISMA-ScR)作为报告指南。
共有 17 项符合纳入标准的研究纳入分析,其中约 70%的研究具有预测水平 I(n=8)和水平 II(n=4)的证据。综述发现,各种指南推荐用于 CVD 风险预测的不同算法。QRISK®是几种研究人群中最准确的 CVD 风险计算器,而世界卫生组织/国际高血压学会(WHO/ISH)风险评分则是最不准确的。CVD 风险计算器的关键特征是变量、预测准确性、区分指数、适用性、可理解性和成本效益。
对于所选的风险预测工具,必须进行开发和验证研究,该研究应考虑特定的中风风险和 CVD 风险的混合,以确定其在当地社区的可用性和对特定医疗保健环境的优势。为了让医疗保健专业人员更多地参与 CVD 的预防和治疗,每个医疗保健环境都应根据人群和医疗保健系统使用更有用、更准确和更易于使用的在线 CVD 风险评估工具。