• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于公路驾驶风险评估的复合安全势场

Composite safety potential field for highway driving risk assessment.

作者信息

Zuo Dachuan, Bian Zilin, Zuo Fan, Ozbay Kaan

机构信息

Department of Civil and Urban Engineering, Tandon School of Engineering, New York University, 6 MetroTech Center, 4th Floor, Brooklyn, NY, USA.

Department of Civil and Urban Engineering, Tandon School of Engineering, New York University, 6 MetroTech Center, 4th Floor, Brooklyn, NY, USA.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2025 Sep;220:108080. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2025.108080. Epub 2025 Jun 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2025.108080
PMID:40489941
Abstract

In the era of rapid advancements in vehicle safety technologies, driving risk assessment has become a focal point of attention. Technologies such as collision warning systems, advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS), and autonomous driving require driving risks to be evaluated proactively and in real time. To be effective, driving risk assessment metrics must not only accurately identify potential collisions but also exhibit human-like reasoning to enable safe and seamless interactions between vehicles. Existing safety potential field models assess driving risks by considering both objective and subjective safety factors. However, their practical applicability in real-world risk assessment tasks is limited. These models are often challenging to calibrate due to the arbitrary nature of their structures, and calibration can be inefficient because of the scarcity of accident statistics. Additionally, they struggle to generalize across both longitudinal and lateral risks. To address these challenges, we propose a composite safety potential field framework, namely C-SPF, involving a subjective field to capture drivers' risk perception about spatial proximity and an objective field to quantify the imminent collision probability, to comprehensively evaluate driving risks. Different from existing models, the C-SPF is calibrated using abundant two-dimensional spacing data from trajectory datasets, enabling it to effectively capture drivers' proximity risk perception and provide a more realistic explanation of driving behaviors. Analysis of a naturalistic driving dataset demonstrates that the C-SPF can capture both longitudinal and lateral risks that trigger drivers' safety maneuvers. Further case studies highlight the C-SPF's ability to explain lateral driver behaviors, such as abandoning lane changes or adjusting lateral position relative to adjacent vehicles, which are capabilities that existing models fail to achieve.

摘要

在车辆安全技术飞速发展的时代,驾驶风险评估已成为关注的焦点。碰撞预警系统、高级驾驶辅助系统(ADAS)和自动驾驶等技术要求对驾驶风险进行主动实时评估。为了有效,驾驶风险评估指标不仅要准确识别潜在碰撞,还要展现出类似人类的推理能力,以实现车辆之间安全无缝的交互。现有的安全势场模型通过考虑客观和主观安全因素来评估驾驶风险。然而,它们在实际风险评估任务中的实际适用性有限。由于其结构的任意性,这些模型通常难以校准,而且由于事故统计数据稀缺,校准效率低下。此外,它们难以在纵向和横向风险上进行通用化。为了应对这些挑战,我们提出了一个复合安全势场框架,即C-SPF,它包括一个主观场来捕捉驾驶员对空间接近度的风险感知,以及一个客观场来量化即将发生碰撞的概率,以全面评估驾驶风险。与现有模型不同,C-SPF使用来自轨迹数据集的丰富二维间距数据进行校准,使其能够有效捕捉驾驶员的接近风险感知,并为驾驶行为提供更现实的解释。对自然驾驶数据集的分析表明,C-SPF可以捕捉引发驾驶员安全操作的纵向和横向风险。进一步的案例研究突出了C-SPF解释驾驶员横向行为的能力,例如放弃变道或调整相对于相邻车辆的横向位置,而这些能力是现有模型无法实现的。

相似文献

1
Composite safety potential field for highway driving risk assessment.用于公路驾驶风险评估的复合安全势场
Accid Anal Prev. 2025 Sep;220:108080. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2025.108080. Epub 2025 Jun 8.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Vision screening of older drivers for preventing road traffic injuries and fatalities.对老年驾驶员进行视力筛查以预防道路交通伤害和死亡。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Feb 21;2014(2):CD006252. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006252.pub4.
4
Analysis of trajectory transection rate on four-lane divided rural highway curves.四车道分隔式乡村公路弯道轨迹横断率分析
Traffic Inj Prev. 2025;26(6):739-747. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2025.2450710. Epub 2025 Jan 29.
5
Cycling infrastructure for reducing cycling injuries in cyclists.用于减少骑车人骑行受伤的自行车基础设施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 10;2015(12):CD010415. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010415.pub2.
6
Integrated deep learning framework for driver distraction detection and real-time road object recognition in advanced driver assistance systems.用于高级驾驶辅助系统中驾驶员分心检测和实时道路物体识别的集成深度学习框架。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 11;15(1):25125. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-08475-4.
7
Short-Term Memory Impairment短期记忆障碍
8
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
9
Driving assessment for maintaining mobility and safety in drivers with dementia.对患有痴呆症的驾驶员进行驾驶评估以维持其行动能力和安全性。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jan 21(1):CD006222. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006222.pub2.
10
Real-world crash configurations and traffic violations among newly licensed young drivers with different route familiarity levels.具有不同路线熟悉程度的新领证年轻驾驶员的现实世界碰撞配置和交通违法行为。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2024;25(5):673-679. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2024.2344109. Epub 2024 Apr 24.