Zuo Dachuan, Bian Zilin, Zuo Fan, Ozbay Kaan
Department of Civil and Urban Engineering, Tandon School of Engineering, New York University, 6 MetroTech Center, 4th Floor, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Department of Civil and Urban Engineering, Tandon School of Engineering, New York University, 6 MetroTech Center, 4th Floor, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Accid Anal Prev. 2025 Sep;220:108080. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2025.108080. Epub 2025 Jun 8.
In the era of rapid advancements in vehicle safety technologies, driving risk assessment has become a focal point of attention. Technologies such as collision warning systems, advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS), and autonomous driving require driving risks to be evaluated proactively and in real time. To be effective, driving risk assessment metrics must not only accurately identify potential collisions but also exhibit human-like reasoning to enable safe and seamless interactions between vehicles. Existing safety potential field models assess driving risks by considering both objective and subjective safety factors. However, their practical applicability in real-world risk assessment tasks is limited. These models are often challenging to calibrate due to the arbitrary nature of their structures, and calibration can be inefficient because of the scarcity of accident statistics. Additionally, they struggle to generalize across both longitudinal and lateral risks. To address these challenges, we propose a composite safety potential field framework, namely C-SPF, involving a subjective field to capture drivers' risk perception about spatial proximity and an objective field to quantify the imminent collision probability, to comprehensively evaluate driving risks. Different from existing models, the C-SPF is calibrated using abundant two-dimensional spacing data from trajectory datasets, enabling it to effectively capture drivers' proximity risk perception and provide a more realistic explanation of driving behaviors. Analysis of a naturalistic driving dataset demonstrates that the C-SPF can capture both longitudinal and lateral risks that trigger drivers' safety maneuvers. Further case studies highlight the C-SPF's ability to explain lateral driver behaviors, such as abandoning lane changes or adjusting lateral position relative to adjacent vehicles, which are capabilities that existing models fail to achieve.
在车辆安全技术飞速发展的时代,驾驶风险评估已成为关注的焦点。碰撞预警系统、高级驾驶辅助系统(ADAS)和自动驾驶等技术要求对驾驶风险进行主动实时评估。为了有效,驾驶风险评估指标不仅要准确识别潜在碰撞,还要展现出类似人类的推理能力,以实现车辆之间安全无缝的交互。现有的安全势场模型通过考虑客观和主观安全因素来评估驾驶风险。然而,它们在实际风险评估任务中的实际适用性有限。由于其结构的任意性,这些模型通常难以校准,而且由于事故统计数据稀缺,校准效率低下。此外,它们难以在纵向和横向风险上进行通用化。为了应对这些挑战,我们提出了一个复合安全势场框架,即C-SPF,它包括一个主观场来捕捉驾驶员对空间接近度的风险感知,以及一个客观场来量化即将发生碰撞的概率,以全面评估驾驶风险。与现有模型不同,C-SPF使用来自轨迹数据集的丰富二维间距数据进行校准,使其能够有效捕捉驾驶员的接近风险感知,并为驾驶行为提供更现实的解释。对自然驾驶数据集的分析表明,C-SPF可以捕捉引发驾驶员安全操作的纵向和横向风险。进一步的案例研究突出了C-SPF解释驾驶员横向行为的能力,例如放弃变道或调整相对于相邻车辆的横向位置,而这些能力是现有模型无法实现的。